ABSTRACT
AIM: Pulmonary fibrosis is often complicated by pulmonary hypertension. Statins reduce fibroblast activity in vitro and pulmonary hypertension in vivo. We investigated whether Simvastatin exerts beneficial effects on pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension in Bleomycin-treated rats in vivo. METHODS: Rats were randomly assigned to controls, Bleomycin, Bleomycin plus Simvastatin from day 1 to 28 and Bleomycin plus Simvastatin from day 13 to 28. 28 days after Bleomycin instillation, right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), right ventricular mass (RV/(LV+S)), right ventricular and circulating brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were determined to assess pulmonary hypertension. Pulmonary hydroxyproline content (HPC), pulmonary connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) transcription and lung compliance (LC) were analysed to characterize pulmonary fibrosis. Exercise capacity was determined by treadmill tests. RESULTS: Compared with controls, Bleomycin increased RVSP, RV/(LV+S), BNP levels, HPC and CTGF transcription and decreased LC significantly. Simvastatin administered from day 1 to 28 normalized all these parameters. Simvastatin administered from day 13 to 28 had no effect on HPC and LC, but reduced RV/(LV+S) significantly and induced a strong trend to lower RVSP and BNP levels. Exercise capacity was reduced by Bleomycin. Simvastatin significantly improved exercise intolerance in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin prevents the development of pulmonary fibrosis, but fails to attenuate already established pulmonary fibrosis. In contrast, it ameliorates pulmonary hypertension and thereby exercise capacity in the prevention and the treatment group regardless of its effects on pulmonary fibrosis. Whether statins are a treatment option in humans with pulmonary fibrosis needs to be investigated by further study.
Subject(s)
Bleomycin/toxicity , Hypertension, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Motor Activity/drug effects , Pulmonary Fibrosis/drug therapy , Simvastatin/pharmacology , Animals , Hydroxyproline , Hypertension, Pulmonary/chemically induced , Hypertrophy, Right Ventricular/chemically induced , Hypertrophy, Right Ventricular/drug therapy , Lung Compliance/drug effects , Male , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/metabolism , Pulmonary Fibrosis/chemically induced , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a common and multiform micturition disorder of various possible origins. Several second-line techniques are available in the event of first-line medicinal treatment failure. These include the intravesical injection of Botulinum toxin, bladder augmentation and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). This study presents current data and results from a prospective study of patients with LUTS of various aetiologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinical success was investigated for all patients who underwent SNM for LUTS with or without urge incontinence caused by chronic pelvic pain syndrome, multiple sclerosis and idiopathic disease between May 2007 and December 2010. The preoperatively determined symptoms were compared with current follow-up data. Median follow-up time was 11âmonths (1 - 43). RESULTS: A total of 47âpatients were indicated for SNM over the investigated period. 80.9 % were female, median patient age was 67âyears (19 - 84). The testing phase was successful in 38âcases (80.9 %) with 9 electrodes being explanted (19.1 %). In the case of idiopathic LUTS we could show a statistically significant increase of micturition volume and reduction of incontinence pad use. There was no statistically significant improvement of any micturition parameter for patients with multiple sclerosis, patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome showed a statistically significant reduction of micturition frequency and a subjective improvement of symptoms in 75 %. CONCLUSIONS: In the selected patient groups SNM is a promising and, in experienced hands, a low-complication second-line therapy for the treatment of LUTS of idiopathic aetiology. However, the general recommendation of SNM for multiple sclerosis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome patients cannot be given on the basis of our results. Further prospective, randomised multicentre studies are need to further refine the indications for SNM in LUTS of neurogenic and non-neurogenic origins.
