[THE RISK AND MANAGEMENT OF RADIATION INDUCED CYSTITIS AFTER RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER].

(Objectives) Radiation induced cystitis (RC) is one of the toxicities we must often treat after radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Some patients require urinary diversion with or without cystectomy.We evaluated the clinical risks and management of RC. (Patients and methods) The clinical records of 303 patients who underwent radiation therapy for prostate cancer (199 only radiation therapy; 104 adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy) between 2005 and 2015 in our institute, were reviewed.We defined RC based on the presence of macrohematuria, not caused by reccurence of prostate cancer or occurrence of bladder cancer. (Results) The median follow up time was 37 months (range 1-132).Thirty patients (9.9%) developed RC.Compared to radiation therapy alone, adjuvant/salvage radiation therapy was found to be a risk for RC (4.5% vs. 20.1%, p< 0.01).Ten out of 30 RC patients needed hospitalization and 6 patients underwent urinary diversion with or without cystectomy.Two patients who underwent urinary diversion without cystectomy were hospitalized for a longer period compared with 4 patients with cystectomy. (Conclusion) Adjuvant/salvage therapy is a risk factor of RC after radiation therapy for prostate cancer.About 2% of the patients needed urinary diversion and cystectomy improved their prognosis.

LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR LARGE RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF SAFETY AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOME.

(Objectives) To evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) >7 cm, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome and long-term cancer control of patients who underwent LRN in comparison to open radical nephrectomy (ORN). (Patients and methods) The clinical records of 79 patients with RCC >7 cm, who underwent radical nephrectomy (37 LRN; 42 ORN) between 1993 and 2014, were reviewed. (Results) The 2 groups (LRN and ORN) were comparable regarding age, body mass index and mean tumor size (86.5 mm vs. 94.6 mm).The operative time was significantly longer in the LRN group than ORN group (204 min vs. 168 min; p<0.05) and blood loss was significantly lower in the LRN group than in the ORN group (144 ml vs. 930 ml; p<0.05).No statistically significant difference was found in complication rate (10.8% vs. 23.8%) and the 2-year recurrence-free survival rate (85.6% vs. 83.8%). (Conclusion) Despite the longer operative time, LRN for large RCC was associated with lower blood loss. This study provides evidence of the safety and efficacy of LRN for large RCC.

[A CASE OF HEPATIC METASTASECTOMY FOR RENAL PELVIS CARCINOMA].

A 68-year-old woman presented with asymptomatic gross hematuria. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed noninvasive tumor in the right ureteropelvic junction. After diagnosis with right pelvis carcinoma by ureteroscopy, she underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in Aug. 2008. Six months later, hepatic metastasis was detected. Three courses of combination chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) were conducted, and then partial response (PR) was achieved. In Aug. 2009, radical metastasectomy for liver metastasis was performed. More than four years and five months after hepatectomy, the patient has achieved a high quality of life.

Active surveillance criteria for prostate cancer: can they be applied to Japanese patients?

Prostate-specific antigen screening has significantly increased the percentage of men who are diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. All men undergoing retropubic radical prostatectomy for primary treatment of prostate cancer from April 2004 to September 2010 in our hospital were examined in order to determine whether active surveillance criteria could be applied to Japanese men. From pathological data of prostate biopsies, whether these men met five published criteria for active surveillance (Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study, University of California, San Francisco, Toronto and Kakehi criteria) was evaluated. Men who met any of the criteria had a statistically significant lower extracapsular extension rate and organ-confinement rate. From the view of the possibility of Gleason upgrading and organ-confinement rate, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institution and Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance Study criteria showed to be appropriate for Japanese patients. However, the present study had limitations of selection bias and a limited number of cases.

Evaluation of docetaxel plus estramustine in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of docetaxel-based chemotherapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Forty-six consecutive HRPC patients treated between January 2003 and March 2008 were included in this analysis. Docetaxel was given at a dose of 35 mg/m(2) twice every 3 weeks and oral estramustine concurrently for three consecutive days during weeks 1 and 2 of each cycle. During each treatment week, the dose of estramustine was 1260 mg on the first day, 980 mg on the second day and 840 mg on the third day. Patients were premedicated with 4 mg twice a day of oral dexamethasone for three consecutive days. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were evaluated at least once every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Patients received a median of three cycles of chemotherapy. Of the evaluable 46 patients, 25 (54%) had a >or=50% PSA decline and 12 (26%) had a >or=75% PSA decline. Median time to PSA progression and overall survival time were 10.1 and 27.0 months, respectively. Median follow-up was 15.0 months. Major severe toxicities were grade 3 or 4 leukopenia in five (11%) patients. Mild toxicities included grade 1 or 2 nausea in eight (17%) patients. Two patients could not continue the treatment because of interstitial pneumonitis and a gastric hemorrhage, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel plus estramustine chemotherapy represents an active and well tolerated treatment for Japanese HRPC patients.