ABSTRACT
As global wind energy capacity continues to expand, the need to site commercial wind farms in productive, affordable, and technically feasible locations has become increasingly important. The use of wind farm site suitability models to identify these locations has grown consequently, thus increasing interest in standardizing certain aspects of these models' development. This systematic review of wind farm site suitability studies seeks to identify similarities and differences in the selection and representation of their enlisted siting factors. The review focuses on how subjective modeling decisions, such as vocabulary choices and dataset selection, occur in the literature, based on five identified themes: 1) Deciding Upon Siting Factors, which explains how a study's geographical context, selected modeling approach, and modeler decisions can influence siting factor selection; 2) Classifying Data and Siting Factor Terminology, which addresses the extent and the advantages of consistent siting factor vocabulary; 3) Implementing Siting Factors as Constraints or as Evaluation Criteria, which covers the importance of consistent implementation and of specifying logic when enlisting siting factors to assess potential wind farm sites; 4) Utilizing Primary and Secondary Data, which details how a study's reliance on external or self-collected datasets influences siting factor representation; and 5) Data Source and Accessibility, which highlights the inconsistent provision of citations and dataset sources, and the availability of datasets for siting factors to the broader scientific community. Standardizing the selection and representation of siting factors would benefit comparisons between wind farm site suitability studies and communication of model outputs to a wider audience.
ABSTRACT
The adoption of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (ABTs) was supposed to increase conservation awareness in different countries and regions of the world. However, there seems to be a limited understanding of the importance of ecosystem services, offered by biological diversity. Thus, the continued decline in biodiversity, especially in developing countries. This study appraised the level of success of the first target of Nigeria's National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP), which is hinged on the first ABT. In a national survey, data were obtained from a total of 1,124 respondents (839 professionals and 285 non-professionals), using a structured questionnaire. Information on the respondents' knowledge of biodiversity conservation and the associated ecosystem services, were elicited. Most of the non-professionals had a low level of understanding of biodiversity concepts (4.9 ± 1.7 to 20.5 ± 3.4%), while there was a moderate level of understanding among the professionals (48.0 ± 8.6 to 88.8 ± 3.4%). Awareness of the NBSAP was low for both groups (43.8 ± 7.2% professionals and 12.1 ± 3.7% non-professionals). The study concludes that there is a need to step up campaigns on biodiversity conservation in Nigeria and promote visits to natural sites. Youth engagement through the employment of graduates of biology-related disciplines, to educate the public on biodiversity conservation and the action plan, could also be a strong determinant to the success of the NBSAP targets.
