ABSTRACT
The elderly suffer a greater number of health problems and have greater need for assistance and care. (1) Background: to determine the profile of the elderly who live alone, identified according to the Primary Care Health Record of Gran Canaria, and to analyze the sociodemographic data of the target population and determine the characteristics related to morbidity. (2) Methods: descriptive, prospective, cross-sectional study carried out in the Primary Health Care Management of Gran Canaria. The study population was all adults over 65 years of age living alone. The instrument used was the Drago-Electronic Health Record. Data analysis was carried out using RStudio version 1.1.447 software, and descriptive analysis and inferential analysis were carried out using the Chi-square values, T-test for independent samples, and ANOVA. (3) Results: The sample amounted to 8679 subjects, predominantly female sex (86.14%) and with a mean age of 79.4 years. Of the sample, 6.4% lived alone. Based on the classification by Adjusted Morbidity Groups (AMG), subjects with "moderate complications" predominated at 45.5%. (4) Conclusions: It is necessary to implement this type of stratification tool, which allows interventions to be carried out in elderly people at risk.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: Estimar el efecto de la vacunación antigripal en los trabajadores de atención primaria y en la población atendida durante la campaña de vacunación antigripal 2015/2016. Diseño: Estudio transversal. Emplazamiento: Todos los centros asistenciales de atención primaria del Área de Salud de Gran Canaria. Participantes: Un total de 1.868 profesionales (33,5% hombres; 66,5% mujeres) y 795.605 personas de la población general (49,4% hombres; 50,6% mujeres). Mediciones principales: En profesionales, las variables de resultado fueron: declaraciones de gripe al Sistema de Vigilancia Epidemiológica y días de incapacidad temporal por enfermedad; en población general: gripes declaradas y coberturas vacunales en función del estado vacunal del sanitario. Se estimó la magnitud de asociación entre la vacunación y la morbilidad mediante modelos de regresión logística. Resultados: Los profesionales sanitarios que no se vacunaron tuvieron un riesgo de tener gripe 1,7 veces superior al de los profesionales que se vacunaron, aunque la diferencia no fue estadísticamente significativa; en población general se encontró una asociación significativa solo en mujeres (OR: 1,3; IC95%: 1,1-1,5). La cobertura poblacional fue significativamente mayor cuando médico y enfermero estaban vacunados (OR: 1,3; IC 95%: 1,3-1,3), y el número de gripes declaradas disminuyó cuando el enfermero estaba vacunado (OR: 0,9; IC 95%: 0,9-0,9). Conclusiones: Se observó un posible efecto protector de la vacunación antigripal en la población general, así como una influencia del estado vacunal de los sanitarios en las coberturas de los pacientes. Aun así, las bajas coberturas registradas apuntan a una necesidad de implementar medidas que propicien una actitud más favorable frente a la vacunación antigripal
Objective: To estimate the effect of the influenza vaccination in Primary Healthcare workers and the general population vaccinated during the 2015/2016 campaign. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: All the Primary Healthcare centres within the Gran Canaria healthcare region. Participants: A total of 1,868 Primary Healthcare workers (33.5% men; 66.5% women) and 795,605 individuals from the general population (49.4% men; 50.6% women). Principal measurements: The outcome variables in Primary Healthcare workers were: influenza cases reported to the Epidemiological Surveillance System, and the sick leave days due to illness. In the general population: reported flu cases and vaccination coverage in connection with the vaccination status of the healthcare professional. The magnitude of association between vaccination and morbidity was estimated applying logistic regression models. Results: Although not statistically significant, healthcare professionals that were not vaccinated had 1.7-fold increase in the risk of having influenza than those vaccinated. In the general population the association was significant in the female population (OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1-1.5). Population coverage was significantly higher when both the doctor and nurse were vaccinated (OR: 1.3; 95 %CI: 1.3-1.3), and reported flu cases decreased when the nurse was vaccinated (OR: 0.9; 95%CI: 0.9-0.9). Conclusion: A possible protective effect of influenza vaccination was observed in the general population, as well as an influence of Primary Healthcare workers on the patients regarding this. Even so, the low coverages registered point to a need to implement measures that may lead to a more favourable attitude towards influenza vaccination
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Middle Aged , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza Vaccines/pharmacokinetics , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Protective Factors , Indicators of Morbidity and MortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of the influenza vaccination in Primary Healthcare workers and the general population vaccinated during the 2015/2016 campaign. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: All the Primary Healthcare centres within the Gran Canaria healthcare region. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,868 Primary Healthcare workers (33.5% men; 66.5% women) and 795,605 individuals from the general population (49.4% men; 50.6% women). PRINCIPAL MEASUREMENTS: The outcome variables in Primary Healthcare workers were: influenza cases reported to the Epidemiological Surveillance System, and the sick leave days due to illness. In the general population: reported flu cases and vaccination coverage in connection with the vaccination status of the healthcare professional. The magnitude of association between vaccination and morbidity was estimated applying logistic regression models. RESULTS: Although not statistically significant, healthcare professionals that were not vaccinated had 1.7-fold increase in the risk of having influenza than those vaccinated. In the general population the association was significant in the female population (OR: 1.3; 95%CI: 1.1-1.5). Population coverage was significantly higher when both the doctor and nurse were vaccinated (OR: 1.3; 95%CI: 1.3-1.3), and reported flu cases decreased when the nurse was vaccinated (OR: 0.9; 95%CI: 0.9-0.9). CONCLUSION: A possible protective effect of influenza vaccination was observed in the general population, as well as an influence of Primary Healthcare workers on the patients regarding this. Even so, the low coverages registered point to a need to implement measures that may lead to a more favourable attitude towards influenza vaccination.
