Proactive Tobacco Treatment for Smokers Using Veterans Administration Mental Health Clinics.

INTRODUCTION: Veterans with a mental health diagnosis have high rates of tobacco use but encounter low rates of treatment from providers. This study tested whether a proactive tobacco treatment approach increases treatment engagement and abstinence rates in Department of Veterans Affairs mental health patients. STUDY DESIGN: RCT. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was performed from 2013 to 2017 and analyses were conducted in 2017. Investigators used the electronic medical record at four Veterans Administration facilities to identify patients documented as current smokers and who had a mental health clinic visit in the past 12 months. INTERVENTION: Patients were mailed an introductory letter and baseline survey. Survey respondents were enrolled and randomized to intervention (n=969) or control (n=969). Control participants received a list of usual Veterans Administration smoking services. Intervention participants received a motivational outreach call, multisession telephone counseling, and assistance with obtaining nicotine replacement therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed surveys at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after randomization. The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day abstinence from cigarettes at 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included use of cessation treatment, self-reported 7-day abstinence at 6-month follow-up, and 6-month prolonged abstinence at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: At 12 months, intervention participants were more likely to report using telephone counseling (19% vs 3%, OR=7.34, 95% CI=4.59, 11.74), nicotine replacement therapy (47% vs 35%, OR=1.63, 95% CI=1.31, 2.03), or both counseling and nicotine replacement therapy (16% vs 2%, OR=11.93, 95% CI=6.34, 22.47). Intervention participants were more likely to report 7-day abstinence (19% vs 14%, OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.12, 2.01) and prolonged 6-month abstinence (16% vs 9%, OR=1.87, 95% CI=1.34, 2.61). After adjusting for non-ignorable missingness at follow-up, the intervention effects on 7-day and prolonged abstinence remained significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Proactive outreach was more effective than usual Veterans Administration care at increasing treatment engagement and long-term abstinence in mental health patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01737281.

Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.

BACKGROUND: Patient, physician, and environmental factors were identified, and the authors examined the contribution of these factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) screening. METHODS: In total, 76,243 FOBT/FIT-positive patients were identified from 120 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between August 16, 2009 and March 20, 2011 and were followed for 6 months. Patient demographic (race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status) and health characteristics (comorbidities), physician characteristics (training level, whether primary care provider) and behaviors (inappropriate FOBT/FIT screening), and environmental factors (geographic access, facility type) were identified from VHA administrative records. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) were estimated with statistical text mining conducted on clinic notes, and follow-up predictors and adjusted rates were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. RESULTS: Roughly 50% of individuals completed a colonoscopy at a VHA facility within 6 months. Age and comorbidity score were negatively associated with follow-up. Blacks were more likely to receive follow-up than whites. Environmental factors attenuated but did not fully account for these differences. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) and physician behaviors (inappropriate screening) fully accounted for the small reverse race disparity and attenuated variation by age and comorbidity score. Patient behaviors (refusal and private sector colonoscopy use) contributed more to variation in follow-up rates than physician behaviors (inappropriate screening). CONCLUSIONS: In the VHA, blacks are more likely to receive colonoscopy follow-up for positive FOBT/FIT results than whites, and follow-up rates markedly decline with advancing age and comorbidity burden. Patient and physician behaviors explain race variation in follow-up rates and contribute to variation by age and comorbidity burden. Cancer 2017;123:3502-12. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Proactive outreach for smokers using VHA mental health clinics: protocol for a patient-randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Persons with a mental health diagnosis have high rates of tobacco use and face numerous barriers to cessation including high levels of nicotine dependence, low rates of tobacco treatment referrals from mental health providers, and limited availability of tobacco treatment targeted to their needs. This manuscript describes the rationale and methods of a clinical trial with the following aims: 1) Compare the reach and efficacy of a proactive telephone-based tobacco cessation program for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) mental health clinic patients to VHA usual care and 2) Model longitudinal associations between baseline patient characteristics and long-term abstinence. METHODS/DESIGN: We will use the electronic medical record to identify patients across four VHA healthcare facilities who have a clinical reminder code indicating current tobacco use in the past six months and who have had a mental health clinic visit in the past 12 months. We will send each patient an introductory letter and baseline survey. Survey respondents (N = 3840) will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intervention or control. Control participants will receive VHA usual care. Intervention participants will receive proactive motivational telephone outreach to offer tobacco treatment. Intervention participants interested in treatment will receive eight weeks of nicotine replacement therapy plus eight sessions of specialized telephone counseling over two months, followed by monthly maintenance counseling for four months. We will conduct telephone surveys with participants at six and 12 months to assess study outcomes. We will collect a mailed saliva sample from patients reporting 7-day abstinence on the telephone surveys. The primary outcome will be cotinine-validated abstinence at 12-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Mental health patients are a high-risk smoking population with significant barriers to cessation. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a program that proactively reaches out to smokers with a mental health treatment history to engage them into telephone cessation counseling targeted to the needs of mental health patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01737281 (registered November 5, 2012).

Accuracy of external cause-of-injury coding in VA polytrauma patient discharge records.

Valid and efficient methods of identifying the etiology of treated injuries are critical for characterizing patient populations and developing prevention and rehabilitation strategies. We examined the accuracy of external cause-of-injury codes (E-codes) in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative data for a population of injured patients. Chart notes and E-codes were extracted for 566 patients treated at any one of four VHA Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center sites between 2001 and 2006. Two expert coders, blinded to VHA E-codes, used chart notes to assign "gold standard" E-codes to injured patients. The accuracy of VHA E-coding was examined based on these gold standard E-codes. Only 382 of 517 (74%) injured patients were assigned E-codes in VHA records. Sensitivity of VHA E-codes varied significantly by site (range: 59%-91%, p < 0.001). Sensitivity was highest for combat-related injuries (81%) and lowest for fall-related injuries (60%). Overall specificity of E-codes was high (92%). E-coding accuracy was markedly higher when we restricted analyses to records that had been assigned VHA E-codes. E-codes may not be valid for ascertaining source-of-injury data for all injuries among VHA rehabilitation inpatients at this time. Enhanced training and policies may ensure more widespread, standardized use and accuracy of E-codes for injured veterans treated in the VHA.

Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that a single question may identify individuals with inadequate health literacy. We evaluated and compared the performance of 3 health literacy screening questions for detecting patients with inadequate or marginal health literacy in a large VA population. METHODS: We conducted in-person interviews among a random sample of patients from 4 VA medical centers that included 3 health literacy screening questions and 2 validated health literacy measures. Patients were classified as having inadequate, marginal, or adequate health literacy based on the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) and the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM). We evaluated the ability of each of 3 questions to detect: 1) inadequate and the combination of "inadequate or marginal" health literacy based on the S-TOFHLA and 2) inadequate and the combination of "inadequate or marginal" health literacy based on the REALM. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 4,384 patients, 1,796 (41%) completed interviews. The prevalences of inadequate health literacy were 6.8% and 4.2%, based on the S-TOHFLA and REALM, respectively. Comparable prevalences for marginal health literacy were 7.4% and 17%, respectively. For detecting inadequate health literacy, "How confident are you filling out medical forms by yourself?" had the largest area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.79) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89) based on the S-TOFHLA and REALM, respectively. AUROCs were lower for detecting "inadequate or marginal" health literacy than for detecting inadequate health literacy for each of the 3 questions. CONCLUSION: A single question may be useful for detecting patients with inadequate health literacy in a VA population.

Results of a randomized controlled trial of intervention to implement smoking guidelines in Veterans Affairs medical centers: increased use of medications without cessation benefit.

BACKGROUND: The AHRQ Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence recommends screening and treatment of all tobacco users. Effective methods to implement recommendations are needed because simple guideline dissemination does not necessarily result in changes in practice. OBJECTIVES: The Guideline Implementation for Tobacco (GIFT) study tested an organizational intervention to improve Guideline implementation. RESEARCH DESIGN: GIFT randomized 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers to intervention or control conditions. We trained prime movers at each site to improve identification of smoking status, promote primary care interventions and increase availability of smoking cessation medications. Sites and patients were evaluated before and after intervention. SUBJECTS: GIFT included 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers and 5678 subjects. MEASURES: Data regarding smoking status, delivery of treatment, medication use, and smoking cessation were collected from participant surveys, medical record review, survey of site leaders, and Pharmacy Benefits Management. RESULTS: The intervention did not increase participant report of being asked about smoking status or receipt of counseling. It did increase the rate of identification of smoking status in the medical record (P = 0.0001) but did not increase the rate of counseling to stop smoking. Site level data showed no increase in the number of patients receiving smoking cessation medications or dollars spent on medications. Individual smoker data showed a significant increase in the use of medications for smoking cessation in intervention sites (odds ratio = 6.89, P < 0.0001); however, only a small minority of smokers received medication even after the intervention. There was no difference in smoking cessation rates between participants at the intervention and treatment sites. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that improvements in smoking cessation rates are likely to require more intensive intervention in this population.

Clinical rating scales and instruments: how do they compare in assessing abnormal, involuntary movements?

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that quantitative instrumental measurements are more sensitive than clinical rating scales to subclinical dyskinesia and parkinsonism. We therefore hypothesized that an instrumental assessment would be more sensitive to the presence of dyskinetic and parkinsonian movements than the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), the Dyskinesia Identification Scale, Condensed User Version (DISCUS), and the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS). We also hypothesized that the DISCUS, by virtue of its more detailed protocol, would be more sensitive than the AIMS. METHOD: Using blinded raters, we compared the clinical rating scales with instrumental measurements in 100 patients referred to a movement disorders clinic. We collected demographic data, risk factors for tardive dyskinesia, current medication use, Axis I and III disorders, and an estimate of cognitive functioning using the Mini-Mental Status Examination. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the AIM and the DISCUS in the identification of dyskinesia. However, an instrumental assessment revealed a significantly greater prevalence of dyskinesia. The Mini-Mental Status Examination was the most prominent predictor of both instrumental and clinical measurements of parkinsonian and dyskinetic movements. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that even trained raters, utilizing standard rating scales, may underestimate the prevalence of some motor abnormalities. Instrumental ratings may be helpful to both the clinician and investigator, particularly when abnormal movements are not clinically obvious. The relationship between cognitive impairment and motor abnormalities remains an important area for further research.

A randomized trial of concurrent versus delayed smoking intervention for patients in alcohol dependence treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Fear of jeopardizing drinking outcomes has resulted in a reluctance to treat tobacco dependence concurrently with alcohol dependence, in spite of the high prevalence of smoking among patients with alcohol dependence. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of smoking treatment and intensive treatment for alcohol dependence, delivered concurrently, with delayed smoking treatment on smoking and alcohol use. METHOD: For the study, 1,943 patients in intensive treatment for alcohol dependence or abuse were screened for participation. Of these, 499 smokers were enrolled and randomized to concurrent (during alcohol treatment) or delayed (6 months later) smoking intervention. The smoking intervention included individual behavioral counseling and nicotine replacement. The main smoking outcome measure was 7-day point prevalent tobacco abstinence, and the main drinking outcome was 6-month prolonged abstinence from alcohol; both measured 18 months after study enrollment. RESULTS: Participants in the concurrent group were more likely to participate in smoking treatment than those in the delayed group (78.5% vs 64.5%, p = .005), but there was no significant difference in cessation rates at 18 months (12.4% vs 13.7%). Prolonged, 6-month abstinence from alcohol was worse in the concurrent group than in the delayed group at 6, 12 and 18 months (41% vs 56%, p =.001; 33% vs 42%,p = .06; 41% vs 48%, p = .14, respectively), and 30-day prolonged alcohol abstinence was also worse in the concurrent treatment group (51% vs 64%, p = .004; 46% vs 53%, p = .11; 48% vs 60%, p = .01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that patients in alcohol treatment are interested in smoking cessation, participate in treatment and demonstrate success; but there was no benefit of concurrent treatment. Drinking outcomes were worse with concurrent tobacco treatment. These findings suggest that smoking cessation intervention should be provided to patients after intensive alcohol treatment; however, the data require confirmation because they are not consistent with the existing literature.

Sensitivity and specificity of select biological indices in characterizing psychotic patients and their relatives.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have detailed biological abnormalities in schizophrenia patients and their first-degree biological relatives, few studies have directly compared the utility of biological indices in these individuals. METHODS: Measures of global smooth-pursuit ocular motor (OM) function, low frequency and alpha band electroencephalogram (EEG) power, and nonspecific fluctuations (NSF) in electrodermal activity and visibility of the plexus in the nailfold were collected from 136 schizophrenia patients and 67 of their first-degree biological relatives, 71 affective disorder psychotic patients and 68 of their first-degree biological relatives, and 169 nonpsychiatric comparison subjects. We conducted receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine how well each index differentiated the patient groups and the groups of first-degree relatives. RESULTS: Smooth-pursuit ocular motor function, low frequency and alpha band EEG power, and nailfold plexus visibility differentiated schizophrenia patients from nonpsychiatric comparison subjects. Nailfold plexus visibility was the only measure that significantly differentiated schizophrenia patients from both nonpsychiatric controls and affective patients. Smooth-pursuit ocular motor function and the number of electrodermal nonspecific fluctuations differentiated relatives of schizophrenia patients from nonpsychiatric comparison subjects. CONCLUSION: Increased nailfold plexus visibility may mark a process associated with abnormal brain development leading to schizophrenia. Smooth-pursuit dysfunction may mark genetic vulnerability that is relatively specific to schizophrenia.

Timing of alcohol and smoking cessation (TASC): smoking among substance use patients screened and enrolled in a clinical trial.

Tobacco dependence is prevalent among alcohol dependent patients, and causes increased morbidity and mortality. Concurrent treatment for these disorders may be advantageous, but there are concerns about adverse effects on alcohol treatment outcomes. The Timing of Alcohol and Smoking Cessation (TASC) Study is a randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatment offered concurrently or six months following intensive rehabilitation for alcohol dependence. This paper describes the study design and baseline characteristics of the study population. Participants were current smokers in intensive alcohol dependence treatment, with willingness to consider quitting smoking. Smoking intervention offered behavioral and pharmacological treatment. One thousand nine hundred forty-three patients were screened for enrollment; 499 were eligible and participated (26%). We describe demographic characteristics, smoking behavior and attitudes among participants and nonparticipants toward smoking cessation and drinking. We conclude that there is considerable interest in smoking cessation in alcohol dependent treatment populations, and recruitment to research studies is feasible.

Characteristics of veterans using Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinics.

In the late 1990s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiated a system of community-based outpatient clinics to enhance access to care. The purpose of this study was to explore factors that may be related to veterans' desire to transfer care from VA-based to community clinics. Among 1,452 veterans who were currently receiving VA clinic care and were eligible for care in two community-based clinics in rural Minnesota, 85 percent responded to a survey. Fifty-four percent of respondents requested community-based outpatient clinic care. Multivariate analysis revealed that veterans less satisfied with VA care were more likely to request a transfer to a community clinic, whereas Veterans SF-36 scale scores were not strongly associated with request for community-based outpatient clinic care. Veterans who had more VA clinic visits were less likely to request community-based outpatient clinic care. The likelihood of requesting also varied across the VA facilities and by VA eligibility level.