Surgery for Spinal Stenosis in Achondroplasia: Causes of Reoperation and Reduction of Risks.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with achondroplasia are prone to symptomatic spinal stenosis requiring surgery. Revision rates are thought to be high; however, the precise causes and rates of reoperation are unknown. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the causes of reoperation after initial surgical intervention in individuals with achondroplasia and spinal stenosis. In addition, we report on surgical techniques aimed at reducing the risks of these reoperations. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted over an 8-year period of all patients with achondroplasia at a single institution that serves as a large referral center for patients with skeletal dysplasias. Patients with achondroplasia who underwent spinal surgery for stenosis were identified and the need for revision surgery was studied. Data collected included demographic, surgical, and revision details. Fisher exact test was used to determine if an association existed between construct type and the need for revisions. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 130 (22%) patients with achondroplasia required spinal stenosis surgery. Twenty-four individuals who met the criteria were selected for analysis. The initial spine surgery was at an average age of 18.7 years (SD: 10.1 y). Nine patients (38%) required revision surgeries, and 3 required multiple revisions. Five of 9 (56%) of the revisions had primary surgery at an outside institution. Revision surgeries were due to caudal pseudarthrosis (the distal instrumented segment) (8), proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (7), and new neurological symptoms (7). There was a significant association found between construct type and the need for revision ( P =0.0111). The pairwise comparison found that short fusions were significantly associated with the need for revision compared with the interbody group ( P =0.0180). PJK was associated with short fusions when compared with the long fusion group ( P =0.0294) and the interbody group ( P =0.0300). Caudal pseudarthrosis was associated with short fusions when compared with the interbody group ( P =0.0015). Multivariate logistic regression found long fusion with an interbody was predictive of and protective against the need for revision surgery ( P =0.0246). To date, none of the initial cases that had long fusions with caudal interbody required a revision for distal pseudarthrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with achondroplasia, the rate of surgery for spinal stenosis is 22% and the risk of revision is 38% and is primarily due to pseudarthrosis, PJK, and recurrent neurological symptoms. Surgeons should consider discussing spinal surgery as part of the patient's life plan and should consider wide decompression of the stenotic levels and long fusion with the use of an interbody cage at the caudal level in all patients to reduce risks of revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Retrospective case series.

Peroneal Nerve Decompression in Patients with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses: Indications, Complications, and Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there have been no studies examining peroneal nerve decompression and proximal fibular osteochondroma excision exclusively in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications, complications, and recurrence associated with nerve decompression and proximal fibular osteochondroma excision in patients with MHE. METHODS: The records on patients with MHE undergoing peroneal nerve decompression from 2009 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications, clinical status, surgical technique, recurrence, and complications were recorded and were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, logistic regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were 126 limbs identified in patients with MHE who underwent peroneal nerve decompression. The most common indications were pain over the proximal fibula, tibialis anterior and/or extensor hallucis longus weakness, and dysesthesias and/or neuropathic pain. Seven cases experienced postoperative foot drop as a complication of the decompression and osteochondroma excision. Logistic regression found significant relationships between complications and excision of anterior osteochondromas (odds ratio [OR], 5.21; p = 0.0062), proximal fibular excision (OR, 14.73; p = 0.0051), and previous decompression (OR, 5.77; p = 0.0124). The recurrence rate was 13.8%, and all recurrences occurred in patients who were skeletally immature at the index procedure. The probability of skeletally immature patients not experiencing recurrence was 88% at 3 years postoperatively and 73% at 6 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for peroneal nerve decompression included neurologic symptoms and pain. The odds of a complication increased with excision of anterior osteochondromas and previous decompression. Recurrence of symptoms following decompression and osteochondroma excision was found exclusively in skeletally immature patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Transphyseal Humeral Separations: An Often-Missed Fracture.

BACKGROUND: Transphyseal humeral separations (TPHS) are rare injuries often associated with non-accidental trauma, necessitating accurate diagnosis. This study aims to assess the accuracy of diagnosis of TPHS. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at five academic pediatric institutions to identify all surgically treated TPHS in patients up to 4 years of age over a 25-year period. Demographics, misdiagnosis rates, and reported misdiagnoses were noted. Comparative analyses were performed to analyze the effects of patient age and injury mechanism on misdiagnosis rates. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (average age: 17.4 months) were identified, with injury mechanisms including accidental trauma (n = 49), non-accidental trauma (n = 21), Cesarean-section (n = 6), and vaginal delivery (n = 3). Neither age nor injury mechanism were significantly associated with diagnostic accuracy in the emergency department (ED)/consulting physician group. ED/consulting physicians achieved an accurate diagnosis 46.7% of the time, while radiologists achieved an accurate diagnosis 26.7% of the time. Diagnostic accuracy did not correlate with Child Protective Services (CPS) involvement or with a delay in surgery of more than 24 h. However, a significant correlation (p = 0.03) was observed between injury mechanism and misdiagnosis rates. CONCLUSION: This multicenter analysis is the largest study assessing TPHS misdiagnosis rates, highlighting the need for raising awareness and considering advanced imaging or orthopedic consultation for accurate diagnosis. This also reminds orthopedic surgeons to always have vigilant assessment in treating pediatric elbow injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective Cohort Study.

Pedicle Screw Fixation for Hemiplegia and Bilateral Hypoesthesia Due to C2-C3 Spinal Fracture Dislocation: A Case Report.

CASE: A 48-year-old man fell from a tree and presented to the emergency department with right-sided full hemiplegia and C3 bilateral hypoesthesia. Imaging was remarkable for a C2-C3 fracture-dislocation. The patient was effectively managed surgically with a posterior decompression and 4-level posterior cervical fixation/fusion that included pedicle screws in the axis fixation and lateral mass screws. The reduction/fixation remained stable, and the patient regained full lower extremity function and demonstrated functional upper-extremity recovery at three-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: C2-C3 fracture-dislocation is a rare but potentially fatal injury due to concomitant spinal cord injury, and its surgical management can be challenging because of the proximity of vascular and nerve structures. Posterior cervical fixation that includes axis pedicle screws can be an effective fixation option in select patients with this condition.

Different approach to charcot neuroarthropathy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) is a degenerative, progressive disease affecting the ankle and foot and it is usually a disabling factor in diabetic patients. Surgical management of CN aims to obtain a painless stable plantigrade foot which can be achieved through fusion. Achieving joint arthrodesis in CN usually carries a high failure rate. CASES PRESENTATION: We presented two patients with late-stage CN foot deformity. The first case is a 52-year-old female with CN on her left ankle and presented without any infection or prior correction. The second case reported a 47-year-old man with complaints of deformity on his right ankle, he had undergone surgical treatment with an external fixator before, and now presented with infection in the surgical site. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Ankle arthrodesis has been considered by many as the treatment of choice for severe and late-stage CN foot. This treatment aims to give a rigid enough fixation which will maintain the stability of the ankle joint and prevents further destruction of surrounding tissue. Multiple modalities of treatment are available and must be chosen accordingly to each clinical case. Minimal implants and the use of multiple bone grafts could be considered as a plan of treatment. Both patients have promising and positive results from the two procedures. CONCLUSION: Treatment of CN Foot with internal plate fixation combined with fibular strut graft seemed to give promising results, both radiographically and functionally. Furthermore, a slight modification of treatment with a minimal implant or iliac graft may be considered.