ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of remote cerebellar hemorrhage (RCH) in patients with a dural tear during spinal surgery is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of RCH and the causative factors in these patients. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent spinal surgery at our institution between March 2015 and September 2016. Eleven of these patients needed dural suturing intraoperatively. All patients underwent CT of the head on the first postoperative day and were categorized according to whether they had RCH or not. The mean values for the amount of intraoperative bleeding, maximum perioperative blood pressure, postoperative drainage volume, and complaints of headache during the first 24 h postoperatively were compared between the two groups using the Welch's two-sample t-test and Fisher's exact test. The follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS: There were four patients in the RCH group and seven in the non-RCH group. The incidence of RCH was 36.4%. There were three cerebellar hemorrhages and one interhemispheric fissure hemorrhage in the RCH group. The mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 284 mL in the RCH group and 569 mL in the non-RCH group. The mean respective values for maximum perioperative blood pressure and postoperative drainage volume were 132 mmHg and 547 mL in the RCH group and 144 mmHg and 567 mL in the non-RCH group; none of the differences was statistically significant. However, complaints of headache in the first 24 h postoperatively were significantly more common in the RCH group than in the non-RCH group (100% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.01). All patients with intracranial bleeding had recovered 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RCH following a dural tear during spinal surgery was 36.4%. There was a significant association between RCH and increased reporting of headache during the first 24 h postoperatively.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: C1 lateral mass screw was widely used for fixation of the upper cervical spine. However, massive bleeding from the C1-2 venous plexus is sometimes encountered. In this study, we proposed an alternate method for C1 lateral mass screw insertion, which involves insertion of the screws caudally from the C2 nerve root to reduce bleeding from C1-2 venous plexus. METHODS: Seven patients with atlantoaxial lesions were included in this study. The mean age at surgery was 65.9 (34-82) years. The mean follow-up period was 23.1 (12-38) months. All patients underwent atlantoaxial fusion with C1 lateral mass screws, which were inserted caudally from the C2 nerve root. All screws were inserted using O-arm based navigation system. Operative time, blood loss, C2 nerve root injury and perioperative complications were investigated. The accuracy of C1 screws and bone union were evaluated using postoperative computed tomography. RESULTS: A total of 13 C1 lateral mass screws were inserted using this method. The mean operative time was 224 (144-305) min. The mean blood loss was 209 (100-357) g. One perioperative complication was observed, which was recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. There were no vertebral artery or spinal cord injuries. No case of massive bleeding from the C1-2 venous plexus was observed. One patient complained of postoperative occipital neuralgia, which disappeared in 2 weeks. No malposition of C1 lateral mass screws was observed on postoperative computed tomography. Bone union was observed in all patients. CONCLUSION: The C1 lateral mass screw insertion caudally from the C2 nerve root may become an alternate method for insertion of C1 screws.
