ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to introduce rating criteria to evaluate student performance in a newly developed, digital wax-up preclinical program for computer-aided design (CAD) of full-coverage crowns and preliminarily investigate the reliability and internal consistency of the rating system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study, conducted in 2017, enrolled 47 fifth-year dental students of Okayama University Dental School. Digital wax-up training included a fundamental practice using computer graphics (CG), multipurpose CAD software programs, and an advanced practice to execute a digital wax-up of the right mandibular second molar (#47). Each student's digital wax-up work (stereolithography data) was evaluated by two instructors using seven qualitative criteria. The total qualitative score (0-90) of the criteria was calculated. The total volumetric discrepancy between each student's digital wax-up work and a reference prepared by an instructor was automatically measured by the CAD software. The inter-rater reliability of each criterion was analyzed using a weighted kappa index. The relationship between the total volume discrepancy and the total qualitative score was analyzed using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: The weighted kappa values for the seven qualitative criteria ranged from 0.62 - 0.93. The total qualitative score and the total volumetric discrepancy were negatively correlated (ρ = -0.27, P = .09, respectively); however, this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The established qualitative criteria to evaluate students' work showed sufficiently high inter-rater reliability; however, the digitally measured volumetric discrepancy could not sufficiently predict the total qualitative score.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine root caries annual incidence (RCAI) and root caries annual progression (RCAP) and risk factors for them among older people requiring nursing care. METHODS: The target population comprised 186 dentate individuals aged ≥ 65 years who required nursing care while living in nursing homes (NHs) or their own homes (OHs) in Okayama, Japan. Survey items included presence/absence and severity of root caries, age, sex, living environment (NH or OH), the Clinical Dementia Rating, and the Barthel Index (BI). Baseline surveys were conducted from 2015 to 2017; subjects were followed up for one year. RCAI and RCAP per tooth and per person were calculated, and risk factors for them were identified using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: In total, 104 individuals (mean age: 82.0 ± 12.4 years) completed the follow-up survey. RCAIs per tooth and per person were 14.6% (173/1188) and 59.6% (62/104), respectively. RCAP per tooth was 22.5% (51/227 teeth with root caries at baseline). Significant risk factors for RCAI were living environment (OH, odds ratio [OR]: 2.14), sex (male, OR: 1.84), clasped tooth (OR: 1.82), and older age (OR: 1.05) at baseline. Significant risk factors for RCAP were sex (male, OR: 5.20), regular dental checkup (OR: 2.74), and high BI score (OR: 1.02) at baseline. CONCLUSION: At one-year follow-up, 59.6% of the subjects developed at least one root caries. Risk factors for RCAI were living environment (OH), male, clasped tooth, and older age, whereas those for RCAP were male, regular dental checkup, and high BI score.
