ABSTRACT
A anafilaxia perioperatória é manifestação importante no contexto de eventos adversos relacionados à cirurgia. Embora frequentemente relacionada à indução anestésica, pode ocorrer por outros agentes administrados por outras vias. A anafilaxia pode se apresentar como colapso cardiovascular, obstrução da via aérea e/ou insuficiência respiratória com ou sem manifestação cutânea, com consequências fatais em muito casos. Apesar de considerada inevitável em alguns casos, a sua incidência poderia (e deveria) ser reduzida através da busca por fármacos mais seguros. A avaliação abrangente de um episódio é um dos elementos primordiais para tornar a exposição subsequente mais segura, com orientações derivadas dessa investigação. Entretanto, representa um desafio estatístico por ser reação rara, randômica e muitas vezes independente de exposições sucessivas dos pacientes a procedimentos de baixo risco. Neste documento são revisados os mecanismos fisiopatológicos, agentes desencadeantes (adultos e crianças), assim como a abordagem diagnóstica durante a crise e após o episódio. Uma avaliação abrangente, a identificação das medicações, antissépticos e outras substâncias usadas em cada região, registros detalhados e nomenclatura padronizada são pontos fundamentais para a obtenção de dados epidemiológicos mais fidedignos sobre a anafilaxia perioperatória.
Perioperative anaphylaxis is an important manifestation in the context of surgery-related adverse events. Although often related to anesthetic induction, it may be caused by other agents administered by other routes. Anaphylaxis may manifest as cardiovascular collapse, airway obstruction and/or respiratory failure with or without skin manifestation, resulting often in death. Although this reaction is considered inevitable in some cases, its incidence could (and should) be reduced by the search for safer drugs. Comprehensive assessment of an allergic reaction is a key element to make subsequent exposure safer, with guidance derived from this investigation. However, surveillance of perioperative anaphylaxis represents a statistical challenge because this is a rare, random reaction and often independent of successive patient exposures to low-risk procedures. This paper reviews pathophysiological mechanisms, triggering agents (adults and children), as well as therapeutic and diagnostic approach during and after an allergic reaction. Comprehensive assessment, identification of medications/antiseptics used in each region and detailed records with standardized terminology are key points for obtaining more reliable epidemiological data on perioperative anaphylaxis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Drug Hypersensitivity , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Perioperative Period , Anaphylaxis , Anesthetics , Patients , Respiratory Insufficiency , Skin Manifestations , Therapeutics , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Epinephrine , Risk , Diagnosis , Allergy and ImmunologySubject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Diagnosis , Allergy and Immunology , Perioperative Period , HypersensitivityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy is quite common in chronic liver disease patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Diagnosis of intraoperative bleeding disorders is based on conventional laboratory tests (CLTs), and thus, the patients are frequently exposed to unnecessary transfusions of blood products. The present study aimed to analyze the intraoperative administration of blood products in patients undergoing OLT, using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) or CLTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort comprising 153 patients undergoing OLT, of whom 82 were evaluated with ROTEM and 71 by CLTs. Both groups were analyzed intraoperatively: the transfusion of blood products. RESULTS: The incidence of patients transfused with cryoprecipitate (CRYO) and/or fibrinogen concentrate (54.9 vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) (32.9 vs. 9.9%; P = 0.008) increased significantly in the ROTEM group than in CLT group, respectively. The amount of transfused patient with CRYO (7.6 vs. 1.2; P < 0.001), fibrinogen concentrate (0.8 vs. 0.2; P = 0.004) and PCC (1.4 vs. 0.2; P = 0.002) increased significantly in the ROTEM group than in the CLT group, respectively. In the analysis of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), the incidence of transfused patients was significantly higher in the CLT group than in the ROTEM group (46.5 vs. 30.5%; P = 0.047, respectively), with a moderate correlation with red blood cells transfusion (r = 0.67, P < 0.001). The incidence of patients receiving antifibrinolytics was significantly higher in the CLT group than in the ROTEM group (85.9 vs. 47.6%; P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Transfusion protocol-based thromboelastometry was able to guide administration of hemostatic factors and reduced administration of FFP and antifibrinolytics.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Disorders/diagnosis , Hemostatics , Liver Transplantation , Thrombelastography , Blood Transfusion , Humans , Liver Transplantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
A anafilaxia perioperatória é manifestação importante no contexto de eventos adversos relacionados à cirurgia. Embora frequentemente relacionada à indução anestésica, pode ocorrer por outros agentes administrados por outras vias. A anafilaxia pode se apresentar como colapso cardiovascular, obstrução da via aérea e/ou insuficiência respiratória com ou sem manifestação cutânea, com consequências fatais em muito casos. Apesar de considerada inevitável em alguns casos, a sua incidência poderia (e deveria) ser reduzida através da busca por fármacos mais seguros. A avaliação abrangente de um episódio é um dos elementos primordiais para tornar a exposição subsequente mais segura, com orientações derivadas dessa investigação. Entretanto, representa um desafio estatístico por ser reação rara, randômica e muitas vezes independente de exposições sucessivas dos pacientes a procedimentos de baixo risco. Neste documento são revisados os mecanismos fisiopatológicos, agentes desencadeantes (adultos e crianças), assim como a abordagem diagnóstica durante a crise e após o episódio. Uma avaliação abrangente, a identificação das medicações, antissépticos e outras substâncias usadas em cada região, registros detalhados e nomenclatura padronizada são pontos fundamentais para a obtenção de dados epidemiológicos mais fidedignos sobre a anafilaxia perioperatória.
Perioperative anaphylaxis is an important manifestation in the context of surgery-related adverse events. Although often related to anesthetic induction, it may be caused by other agents administered by other routes. Anaphylaxis may manifest as cardiovascular collapse, airway obstruction and/or respiratory failure with or without skin manifestation, resulting often in death. Although this reaction is considered inevitable in some cases, its incidence could (and should) be reduced by the search for safer drugs. Comprehensive assessment of an allergic reaction is a key element to make subsequent exposure safer, with guidance derived from this investigation. However, surveillance of perioperative anaphylaxis represents a statistical challenge because this is a rare, random reaction and often independent of successive patient exposures to low-risk procedures. This paper reviews pathophysiological mechanisms, triggering agents (adults and children), as well as therapeutic and diagnostic approach during and after an allergic reaction. Comprehensive assessment, identification of medications/antiseptics used in each region and detailed records with standardized terminology are key points for obtaining more reliable epidemiological data on perioperative anaphylaxis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Drug Hypersensitivity , Perioperative Period , Anaphylaxis , Anesthetics , Patients , Research , Respiratory Insufficiency , Therapeutics , Mastocytosis , Immunoglobulin E , Skin Tests , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Epinephrine , Diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Allergy and Immunology , Tryptases , Hypersensitivity , AngioedemaABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to highlight the importance of making informed choices of anesthetics and evaluating the impact of depth of anesthesia, hemodynamic status and other factors capable of interfering with signal capture during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). RECENT FINDINGS: Over the last decades, neuromonitoring has advanced considerably, allowing for insights into neurological function during anesthesia and making it possible to assess intraoperative consciousness and neural integrity in real time. IONM is indicated in surgeries posing risk to targeted neural tissues and adjacent structures. The technique helps correlate surgical maneuvers with neurophysiological changes at high levels of sensitivity and specificity and can identify risk situations early enough to prevent postoperative neurological deficits. SUMMARY: Experience with IONM, the use of an adequate IONM modality, and knowledge of the effect of anesthetic techniques and agents on neurophysiological parameters are fundamental for reliable measurements. The current gold standard in IONM is total intravenous anesthesia without neuromuscular block.
