Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is an uncommon but emerging syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. While the presentation of MIS-C is generally delayed after exposure to the virus that causes coronavirus 2019, both MIS-C and Kawasaki disease (KD) share similar clinical features. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge given the lack of definitive diagnostic tests and a paucity of evidence regarding treatment modalities. We review the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluations, and management of MIS-C and compare its clinical features to those of KD.

Points & pearls: Anaphylaxis in pediatric patients: early recognition and treatment are critical for best outcomes

Anaphylaxis is a time-sensitive, clinical diagnosis that is often misdiagnosed because the presenting signs and symptoms are similar to those of other disease processes. This issue reviews the criteria for diagnosing a pediatric patient with anaphylaxis and offers evidence-based recommendations for first- and second-line treatment, including the use of epinephrine, antihistamines, and corticosteroids. Guidance is also provided for the appropriate disposition of patients with anaphylaxis, including prescribing epinephrine autoinjectors and offering training on how to use them, educating patients and families on avoidance of known offending allergens, and referring the patient to a specialist in allergy and immunology. [Points & Pearls is a digest of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice.]

Anaphylaxis in pediatric patients:early recognition and treatment are critical for best outcomes.

Anaphylaxis is a time-sensitive, clinical diagnosis that is often misdiagnosed because the presenting signs and symptoms are similar to those of other disease processes. This issue reviews the criteria for diagnosing a pediatric patient with anaphylaxis and offers evidence-based recommendations for first- and second-line treatment, including the use of epinephrine, antihistamines, and corticosteroids. Guidance is also provided for the appropriate disposition of patients with anaphylaxis, including prescribing epinephrine autoinjectors and offering training on how to use them, educating patients and families on avoidance of known offending allergens, and referring the patient to a specialist in allergy and immunology.

Los Angeles phonospirometry technique: creating a normogram that correlates with peak expiratory flow measurements in children.

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of peak expiratory flow (PEF) is recommended in the assessment of patients with asthma. However, the use of PEF involves multiple barriers, which have limited its use. Phonospirometry, as assessed by a novel Los Angeles phonospirometry technique, has shown good correlation to standard PEF measurements in a pilot study on symptomatic patients with asthma. We sought to develop a normogram for phonospirometry, and to validate the PEF normogram. METHODS: A convenience sample of asymptomatic children ages 3-17 years old was approached for participation in the Emergency Department. Sample size calculations determined that at least 30 children per age group (n = 450) were needed. Children were asked to perform PEF measurements and phonospirometry, measured as the length of time (in s) the child was able to chant "lalala" in a single breath. RESULTS: 510 children were enrolled. Spearman's rho between PEF and phonospirometry was 0.722. Phonospirometry correlated with both age and height, with a Spearman rho of 0.697 and 0.696, respectively. This was slightly lower than the correlation of PEF with age and height with Spearman rhos of 0.877 and 0.902, respectively. A normogram was developed for phonospirometry based on age and height. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined normal value ranges for the Los Angeles phonospirometry technique for age and height, and also showed that the technique has good correlation with PEF. This technique may be used to assess a pediatric patient with an acute asthma exacerbation.

Correlation of a unique "Los Angeles" phonospirometry technique with peak expiratory flows in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of peak expiratory flow (PEF) is recommended as part of the assessment of patients with asthma. However, there are multiple barriers in the use of PEF, even for older pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: Phonospirometry, as measured by the Los Angeles (LA) technique, was assessed and compared with standard PEF measurements in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic asthma. METHODS: A convenience sample of patients with asthma aged 8-17 years was enrolled from visits in the Allergy/Immunology Clinic and in the Emergency Department of Children's Hospital Los Angeles. The phonospirometry technique was demonstrated, and the length of time the patient repeated the syllable "lah" continuously with the same breath was measured. After a brief interval of time to recover, the patient performed conventional PEF measurement. RESULTS: Using the first observation for each patient in our study, the Pearson correlation coefficient between phonospirometry and PEF was r = 0.67, p = .0016 for asymptomatic asthma patients and r = 0.77, p < .0001 for symptomatic asthma patients. Analysis of the first and last measurements of the symptomatic asthma patients who had multiple measurements revealed a Pearson correlation coefficient between phonospirometry and PEF at first measurement r = 0.69, p = .0008 and at the last measurement r = 0.76, p < .0001. CONCLUSIONS: Using the LA technique, phonospirometry was shown to have a linear correlation with PEF in pediatric patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic asthma. It is simple and easily reproducible, as well as cross-cultural. This novel technique shows promise to aid the assessment of patients with acute asthma exacerbations.

Dehydration treatment practices among pediatrics-trained and non-pediatrics trained emergency physicians.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to survey emergency physicians in the United States regarding the management of pediatric dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis. We hypothesized that responses from physicians with dedicated pediatric training (PT), that is, board certification in pediatrics or pediatric emergency medicine, would differ from responses of physicians with no dedicated pediatric training (non-PT). METHODS: An anonymous survey was mailed to randomly selected members of the American College of Emergency Physicians and sent electronically to enrollees of Brown University pediatric emergency medicine listserv. The survey consisted of 17 multiple-choice questions based on a clinical scenario depicting a 2-year-old with acute gastroenteritis and moderate dehydration. Questions asked related to treatment preferences, practice setting, and training information. RESULTS: One thousand sixty-nine surveys were received: 997 surveys were used for data analysis, including 269 PT physicians and 721 non-PT physicians. Seventy-nine percent of PT physicians correctly classified the scenario patient as moderately dehydrated versus 71% of non-PT physicians (P = 0.063). Among those who correctly classified the patient, 121 PT physicians (58%) and 350 non-PT physicians (68%) would initially hydrate the patient with intravenous fluids. Pediatrics-trained physicians were more likely to initially choose oral or nasogastric hydration compared with non-PT physicians (P = 0.0127). Pediatrics-trained physicians were less likely to perform laboratory testing compared with the non-PT group (n = 92, 45%, vs n = 337, 66%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to established recommendations for the management of moderately dehydrated children, significantly more PT physicians, compared with non-PT physicians, follow established guidelines.