Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Food Prot ; 75(11): 1960-7, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23127704

ABSTRACT

Studies were conducted to compare the decontamination efficacy of six chemical treatments against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and multidrug-resistant and antibiotic-susceptible Salmonella inoculated on beef trimmings. The inocula, comprising four-strain mixtures of rifampin-resistant E. coli O157:H7 and antibiotic-susceptible or multidrug-resistant (MDR and/or MDR-AmpC) Salmonella Newport and Salmonella Typhimurium, were inoculated (3 log CFU/cm(2)) separately onto samples (10 by 5 by 1 cm) derived from beef chuck rolls. Samples were left untreated (control), were immersed for 30 s in acidified sodium chlorite (0.1%, pH 2.5), peroxyacetic acid (0.02%, pH 3.8), sodium metasilicate (4%, pH 12.6), Bromitize Plus (0.0225% active bromine, pH 6.6), or AFTEC 3000 (pH 1.2), or were immersed for 5 s in SYNTRx 3300 (pH 1.0). Levels of surviving Salmonella on treated trimmings were not influenced by serotype or antibiotic resistance phenotype and were generally similar (P ≥ 0.05) or lower (P < 0.05) than levels of surviving E. coli O157:H7 regardless of antimicrobial treatment. Overall, depending on chemical treatment (reductions within each chemical treatment were similar among all tested inocula), initial counts of E. coli O157:H7 (2.7 to 3.1 log CFU/cm(2)) were reduced (P < 0.05) by 0.2 to 1.4 log CFU/cm(2). Similarly, initial counts of the tested Salmonella inocula (2.8 to 3.3 log CFU/cm(2)) were reduced (P < 0.05) by 0.4 to 1.4 (Salmonella Newport, antibiotic susceptible), 0.3 to 1.4 (Salmonella Newport, MDR-AmpC), 0.2 to 1.5 (Salmonella Typhimurium, antibiotic susceptible), 0.4 to 1.3 (Salmonella Typhimurium, MDR), and 0.4 to 1.5 (Salmonella Typhimurium, MDR-AmpC) log CFU/cm(2), depending on antimicrobial treatment. Reductions obtained with sodium metasilicate were 1.3 to 1.5 log CFU/cm(2), regardless of inoculum, and reductions obtained with the five remaining antimicrobial treatments were 0.2 to 0.7 log CFU/cm(2) (depending on treatment). Findings of this study should be useful to regulatory authorities and the meat industry as they consider Salmonella contamination on beef trimmings.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants/pharmacology , Escherichia coli O157/drug effects , Meat/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Salmonella/drug effects , Animals , Bromine Compounds/pharmacology , Cattle , Chlorides/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli O157/growth & development , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Handling/methods , Food Microbiology , Humans , Peracetic Acid/pharmacology , Salmonella/growth & development , Silicates/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...