Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Health Policy Plan ; 39(3): 327-331, 2024 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217482

ABSTRACT

The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic and the establishment of a new transitional government in Sudan with rejuvenated relations with the international community paved the way for external assistance to the EU COVID-19 response project, a project with a pioneering design within the region. The project sought to operationalize the humanitarian-development-peace nexus, perceiving the nexus as a continuum rather than sequential due to the protracted nature of emergencies in Sudan and their multiplicity and contextual complexity. It went further into enhancing peace through engaging with conflict and post-conflict-affected states and communities and empowering local actors. Learning from this experience, external assistance models to low- or middle-income countries (LMICs) should apply principles of flexibility and adaptability, while maintaining trust through transparency in exchange, to ensure sustainable and responsive action to domestic needs within changing contexts. Careful selection and diverse project team skills, early and continuous engagement with stakeholders, and robust planning, monitoring and evaluation processes were the project highlights. Yet, the challenges of political turmoil, changing Ministry of Health leadership, competing priorities and inactive coordination mechanisms had to be dealt with. While applying such an approach of a health system lens to health emergencies in LMICs is thought to be a success factor in this case, more robust technical guidance to the nexus implementation is crucial and can be best attained through encouraging further case reports analysing context-specific practices.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , Sudan , Emergencies , Pandemics
2.
BMC Prim Care ; 23(1): 44, 2022 03 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279085

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess primary care physicians' satisfaction towards initiation of phone consultation during COVID-19 pandemic management in Qatar and to identify the factors associated with dis/satisfaction. DESIGN: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted from 1 June to 30 July 2020. SETTING: All the available 27 public primary healthcare centers in Qatar at the time of the study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred ninety-four primary care physicians working in the publicly run primary healthcare corporation in Qatar. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall satisfaction of primary care physicians with the initiation of phone consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar and their satisfaction towards each aspect of this management. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine primary care physicians participated in the survey with a response rate of 53.1%. Overall, about 45% and 21% of respondents agreed that COVID-19 disease management has highly impacted and very highly impacted their daily practice, respectively. More than half of the physicians (59.9%) indicated being satisfied/highly satisfied with the initiation of telephone consultation service. On the other hand, few physicians were satisfied (14.3%) or highly satisfied (3.4%) with conducting telephone consultations with patients who lack previous electronic medical records. Also, only 20.3% and 3.8% of physicians were satisfied and highly satisfied with the lack of physical examination in telephone consultations, respectively. On bivariate analysis, primary care physicians' age was significantly associated with the perceived level of impact of COVID-19 management on daily practice (P = 0.03). There was no significant association between participants' characteristics and the level of satisfaction toward telephone consultations. On the other hand, there was a statistically significant association between physicians' age (p = 0.048) and gender (p = 0.014) and their level of satisfaction toward communication and support.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians, Primary Care , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pandemics , Personal Satisfaction , Qatar/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation , Telephone
3.
Infect Dis Health ; 27(3): 111-118, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35033488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers are experiencing unprecedented pressure from stressors including enormous workload, virus exposure, and inadequate PPE. This study aimed to assess primary healthcare physicians' satisfaction towards work safety and personal protective equipment and their predictors during early stages of COVID-19 pandemic in Qatar. METHODS: A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 27 primary healthcare centers in Qatar from 1st June to 30 July 2020. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used when appropriate. A multivariable linear regression analysis was done to identify predictors of satisfaction among participants. RESULTS: A total of 262 participants completed the questionnaire with a response rate of 58.2%. 51.9% were males and 68.3% were family physicians. Only 14.9% and 17.2% of respondents were satisfied or highly satisfied about the overall safety of work and the clinical guidelines on the use of PPE in the context of COVID-19 respectively. Participants who were general practitioners were significantly more likely to be satisfied with maintaining work safety and local PPE guidelines compared to family physicians by 2.93 scores (95% CI 1.43, 4,43 p -value <0.001), and 2.82 scores (95% CI 1.19, 4,44 p -value 0.001) respectively. Also, physicians who had more than ten years of experience in practice were significantly more likely to be satisfied with the PPE use guidelines compared to those who had fewer years of experience by 1.93 scores (95% CI 0.45, 3.41 p -value 0.011). CONCLUSION: Overall satisfaction of participants with the safety of work and PPE clinical practice guidelines was low.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Personal Protective Equipment , Personal Satisfaction , Primary Health Care , Qatar/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(1)2022 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36611328

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of three diagnostic methods (near-infrared transillumination (NIRT), bitewing radiographs (BW), and clinical images (CI)) to detect occlusal carious lesions in a low caries risk population. This retrospective analysis included one hundred and eighty-eight occlusal surfaces, scored as sound surface, early lesion, or distinct lesion. We evaluated the agreement between and within the methods over time. Kappa statistics tested the correlation between the methods. Examiners detected occlusal early lesions more frequently with visual examination and NIRT and the same lesions were confirmed on the 2-year follow-up. Within the limitations of this study, we were able to establish that early occlusal lesions can be detected and monitored over time using NIRT and visual exam, while BW scores showed mostly sound surfaces at both examinations. NIRT combined with clinical examination can be considered appropriate to detect and monitor early enamel caries on the occlusal surface in low caries-risk populations.

5.
East Mediterr Health J ; 27(2): 116-123, 2021 Feb 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33665795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco is a leading cause of death and illness despite > 50 years of antitobacco efforts. AIMS: To establish the determinants of current and former smoking and smokeless tobacco use in Sudan as measured by the STEPwise Survey 2016. METHODS: A household-based cross-sectional World Health Organization STEPwise Survey was conducted among 7745 Sudanese citizens aged 18-69 years across 11 states in Sudan. A 4-stage stratified cluster sampling design was implemented. The generic STEPS Instrument (version 3.2) was used and questions were tailored to the Sudanese context. RESULTS: Among current male smokers, 63.7% were aged ≤ 35 years, 50.7% were illiterate or did not complete primary school, 84.5% were employed and 52.4% were in the lowest 2 quintiles of income. Among male smokeless tobacco users, 54.8% were aged ≤ 35 years, 48.4% were illiterate or did not complete primary school, 89.7% were employed and 52.2% were in the lowest 2 quintiles of income. Using multivariate logistic regression models, current smoking in men was associated with older age, informal education, unemployment and lower income. Smokeless tobacco use was associated with age 18-25 years, informal education, unemployment and lower income. CONCLUSIONS: Both forms of tobacco use were associated with poor socioeconomic status and unemployment. Smokeless tobacco use was associated with age 18-25 years as opposed to smoking tobacco use. These results can inform the target audience of the future tobacco control plans.


Subject(s)
Nicotiana , Tobacco, Smokeless , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Socioeconomic Factors , Sudan/epidemiology , Tobacco Use/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...