WE-E-BRB-03: Development of a Deformable Dosimetric Phantom for Verification of 4D Dose Calculation Algorithms.

PURPOSE: To develop a deformable lung phantom to verify voxel mapping and dose accumulation in 4D dose calculation algorithms used under different scenarios of tissue compression. METHODS: The phantom consists primarily of a heterogeneous sponge with an embedded tissue-equivalent tumor. The sponge is wrapped in a latex balloon housed in a Lucite cylinder. The balloon is attached to a piston that compresses the sponge to mimic the human diaphragm. The phantom was programmed to simulate different breathing patterns. Radiochromic films and TLD were embedded in the sponge for 4D dosimetry algorithm verification. 37 anatomical landmarks were manually tracked to verify voxel mappings for four deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms: in-house developed Demons and finite element model algorithms, and two B-Spline based Velocity AI registration algorithms performed between end-inhale and end-exhale. A 6MV photon beam was simulated with BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc on the end-inhale image with the dose mapped to the end-exhale using voxel-based linear dose mapping (LDM) and particle-based energy-mass congruence mapping (EMCM) methods. RESULTS: The mean density of the artificial lung was increased by 10.2% as the sponge was compressed by 2.5cm. The reproducibility of the phantom deformation was within image resolution (1×1×3 mm3), and the accuracy of four DIR registrations of the extreme phases was within 3.0mm. With the same registration displacement vector field (DVF), EMCM and LDM had different doses mapped to the end- exhale image. Their difference at the center of a beam was up to 8.3% for a Demons DVF and 5.8% for a Velocity DVF. The maximum difference between EMCM and LDM was 13.2% at beam penumbra. CONCLUSIONS: The developed deformable dosimetric phantom readily demonstrated variations among different dose addition and image registration algorithms, and is appropriate to serve as a QA tool for verification of 4D dose calculation algorithms. The research was supported by NIH/NCI R01CA140341.

SU-E-J-59: Dual Imaging Guided Localization System for Spine Radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: To compare localization accuracies between an ExacTrac and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems for single fraction spine adiosurgery. The work also aimed to evaluate the inherent systematic deviation of both ExacTrac and CBCT systems to achieve highly accurate localization in the spine radiosurgery. METHODS: ExacTrac and CBCT imaging systems were evaluated using the linac isocenter as the mutual reference point. First, a BB was placed in an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom. The phantom was localized with both imaging systems and the procedure was repeated 12 times. These results were used to devise a localization protocol using both imaging systems in spine radiosurgery, and employed for 51 patients (81 isocenters) prescribed for single fraction treatment. The displacement discrepancy between the isocenter and two systems were quantified in four dimensions (three translations, one rotation). A Student's two-tailed t-test was used to test for significant differences between the two imaging systems. RESULTS: The phantom study showed 1.4±0.5, 0.6±0.5, and 0.1±0.5 mm differences between the two imaging systems in the anterior/posterior (A/P), superior/inferior (S/I) and left/right (L/R) directions, respectively. The angular difference was minimal along all three axes. The patient study revealed similar isocenter discrepancies between ExacTrac and CBCT of 1.1 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0±0.9 mm, and 0.2±0.9 mm in the A/P, S/I, and L/R directions, respectively, with the A/P and S/I directions showing statistical significance ((t(80) = 13.5 and 7.6 respectively, p = 0.000). The couch yaw discrepancy was 0 ± 0.3°. Overall, 1 mm systematic differences were observed in the A/P and S/I directions between ExacTrac and CBCT localization systems, both in phantom and patient. A procedure was developed to mitigate this systematic discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have justified our patient localization tolerance levels of 2 mm translation and 1 degree rotation for spine SRS treatment.

SU-E-T-197: A Comprehensive Variance Reporting System and an Analysis of Variances Reported at Our Institution.

PURPOSE: It is essential for radiation oncology departments to have comprehensive patient safety and quality programs. Two years ago we undertook a systematic review of our safety/QA program. Existing policies were updated and new policies created where necessary. One crucial component of any safety/QA program is continually updating it based on current information, the 'check' and 'act' portions of the Deming Cycle. We accomplished this with a transparent variance reporting system and a safety/QA committee reviewing and acting on reported variances. METHODS: With 5 radiation oncology centers in our institution, we needed to devise a system that would allow anyone to report a variance and provide our QA committee the ability to review variances system-wide. We developed the system using web-based tools. The system allows individuals to report variances, anonymously or named, specify the nature of the variance and indicate the tools used to identify the variance. RESULTS: In 2011, 285 variances were reported, 102 were reported by physicists, 86 anonymously, 71 by therapists and 26 by dosimetrists. We realized the need to develop clear classifications for variances. We added a high priority category, defined as variances which resulted in or had the potential to result in harm to a patient or when a policy is purposely overridden. Of the 285 variances reported, 5 were high priority. We created a process variance category, defined as variances where a specific clinical process is not followed. Of the 285 reported variances 155 were process variances. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of variances through a centralized database is central toward developing a robust patient safety/quality assurance program. Anonymous reporting fosters a non-punitive environment, and promotes the 'safety culture'. The goal of such a system is to review trends in clinical processes and ultimately to improve safety/quality by reducing variances associated with these processes.

Dose delivered from Varian's CBCT to patients receiving IMRT for prostate cancer.

With the increased use of cone beam CT (CBCT) for daily patient setup, the accumulated dose from CBCT may be significantly higher than that from simulation CT or portal imaging. The objective of this work is to measure the dose from daily pelvic scans with fixed technical settings and collimations. CBCT scans were acquired in half-fan mode using a half bowtie and x-rays were delivered in pulsed-fluoro mode. The skin doses for seven prostate patients were measured on an IRB-approved protocol. TLD capsules were placed on the patient's skin at the central axis of three beams: AP, left lateral (Lt Lat) and right lateral (Rt Lat). To avoid the ring artefacts centred in the prostate, the treatment couch was dropped 3 cm from the patient's tattoo (central axis). The measured AP skin doses ranged 3-6 cGy for 20-33 cm separation. The larger the patient size the less the AP skin dose. Lateral doses did not change much with patient size. The Lt Lat dose was approximately 4.0 cGy, which was approximately 40% higher than the Rt Lat dose of approximately 2.6 cGy. To verify this dose asymmetry, surface doses on an IMRT QA phantom (oval shaped, 30 cm x 20 cm) were measured at the same three sites using TLD capsules with 3 cm table-drop. The dose asymmetry was due to: (1) kV source rotation which always starts from the patient's Lt Lat and ends at Lt Lat. Gantry rotation gets much slower near the end of rotation but dose rate stays constant and (2) 370 degrees scan rotation (10 degrees scan overlap on the Lt Lat side). In vivo doses were measured inside a Rando pelvic heterogeneous phantom using TLDs. The left hip (femoral head and neck) received the highest doses of approximately 10-11 cGy while the right hip received approximately 6-7 cGy. The surface and in vivo doses were also measured for phantoms at the central-axis setup. The difference was less than approximately 12% to the table-drop setup.

Optimized source selection for intracavitary low dose rate brachytherapy.

A procedure has been developed for automating optimal selection of sources from an available inventory for the low dose rate brachytherapy, as a replacement for the conventional trial-and-error approach. The method of optimized constrained ratios was applied for clinical source selection for intracavitary Cs-137 implants using Varian BRACHYVISION software as initial interface. However, this method can be easily extended to another system with isodose scaling and shaping capabilities. Our procedure provides optimal source selection results independent of the user experience and in a short amount of time. This method also generates statistics on frequently requested ideal source strengths aiding in ordering of clinically relevant sources.