Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 47(11): 629-637, nov. 2023. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227048

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Conocer el rendimiento de los criterios de aislamiento preventivo del programa Resistencia Zero (RZ) e identificar los factores que pudieran mejorar su rendimiento. Diseño: Estudio de cohorte prospectivo y multicéntrico. Ámbito: Unidades de cuidados críticos que aplicaban el protocolo RZ, y que aceptaron la invitación al estudio. Pacientes o participantes: Pacientes a los que se les realizaron cultivos de vigilancia (nasal, faríngeo, axilar y rectal) y/o diagnósticos al ingreso en la UCI. Intervenciones: Análisis de los factores de riesgo (FR) RZ y otras variables del registro ENVIN. Se realizó un estudio univariable y multivariable con metodología de regresión logística binaria (significación con p<0,05). Se efectuó análisis de sensibilidad y especificidad para cada uno de los factores seleccionados. Variables de interés principales: Portador de bacteria multirresistente (BMR) al ingreso en la UCI, FR (antecedente de colonización/infección por BMR, ingreso hospitalario en los 3 meses previos, uso de antibiótico el mes previo, estar institucionalizado, diálisis y otras condiciones crónicas) y comorbilidades. Resultados: Participaron 2.252 pacientes de 9 UCI españolas. Fueron identificados BMR en 283 (12,6%). Ciento noventa y tres (68,2%) presentaban algún FR (OR: 4,6; IC 95%: 3,5-6,0). Todos los FR del programa RZ alcanzaron significación estadística (sensibilidad: 66%; especificidad: 79%), siendo el antecedente de BMR el factor con más peso. Inmunodepresión, tratamiento antibiótico al ingreso y sexo masculino son FR adicionales para BMR. Se aislaron BMR en 87 (31,8%) sin FR. (AU)


Objective: To verify the validity of a check list of risk factors (RF) proposed by the Spanish “Resistencia Zero” project (RZ) in the detection of multi-resistant bacteria (MRB), as well as to identify other possible RF for colonization and infection by MRB at intensive care (ICU) admission. Design: A prospective cohort study, conducted in 2016. Setting: Multicenter study, patients who needed admission to adult critical care units that applied the RZ protocol and accepted the invitation for the study. Patients or participants: Consecutive sample of patients admitted to ICU, who underwent surveillance (nasal, pharyngeal, axillary, and rectal) or clinical cultures. Interventions: Analysis of the RF of RZ project, in addition to other comorbidities, included in the ENVIN registry. A univariate and multivariate study was conducted, with binary logistic regression methodology (significance with P<.05). Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed for each of the selected factors. Main variables of interest: Carrier of BMR at ICU admission, RF (previous MRB colonization/infection, hospital admission in the previous 3 months, antibiotic use in the past month, institutionalization, dialysis, and other chronic conditions) and comorbidities. Results: Two thousand two hundred and seventy patients were included from 9 Spanish ICUs. We identified BMR in 288 (12.6% of total patients admitted). One hundred and ninety-three (68.2%) had some RF (OD 4.6 -95% CI 3.5-6.0). All 6 RF from check list achieved statistical significance in the univariate analysis (sensitivity 66%, specificity 79%). Immunosuppression, antibiotic use at ICU admission and male gender were additional RF for BMR. BMR were isolated in 87 patients (31.8%) without RF. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Patient Isolation , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Prospective Studies , Intensive Care Units , Risk Factors , Drug Resistance, Microbial
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37173217

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To verify the validity of a checklist of risk factors (RFs) proposed by the Spanish "Zero Resistance" project (ZR) in the detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MRB), and to identify other possible RFs for colonization and infection by MRB on admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). DESIGN: A prospective cohort study, conducted in 2016. SETTING: Multicenter study, patients requiring admission to adult ICUs that applied the ZR protocol and accepted the invitation for participating in the study. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of patients admitted to the ICU and who underwent surveillance (nasal, pharyngeal, axillary and rectal) or clinical cultures. INTERVENTIONS: Analysis of the RFs of the ZR project, in addition to other comorbidities, included in the ENVIN registry. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed, with binary logistic regression methodology (significance considered for p < 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed for each of the selected factors. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Carrier of MRB on admission to the ICU, RFs (previous MRB colonization/infection, hospital admission in the previous 3 months, antibiotic use in the past month, institutionalization, dialysis, and other chronic conditions) and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 2270 patients from 9 Spanish ICUs were included. We identified MRB in 288 (12.6% of the total patients admitted). In turn, 193 (68.2%) had some RF (OR 4.6, 95%CI: 3.5-6.0). All 6 RFs from the checklist reached statistical significance in the univariate analysis (sensitivity 66%, specificity 79%). Immunosuppression, antibiotic use on admission to the ICU and the male gender were additional RFs for MRB. MRB were isolated in 87 patients without RF (31.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with at least one RF had an increased risk of being carriers of MRB. However, almost 32% of the MRB were isolated in patients without RFs. Other comorbidities such as immunosuppression, antibiotic use on admission to the ICU and the male gender could be considered as additional RFs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...