Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 5(12): 2325967117743915, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US)-guided intra-articular hip injections have been proposed in the literature to be accurate, reliable, and safe alternatives to fluoroscopy-guided injections. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of US-guided magnetic resonance (MR) arthrogram injections of the hip performed in the office setting by a single orthopaedic surgeon and elucidate the potential effects that patient age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) have on contrast placement. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: From a review of the senior author's office database, 89 patients (101 hips) who had US-guided MR arthrogram injections performed between December 2014 and June 2016 were identified. Official radiology reports were evaluated to determine whether extra-articular contrast was noted. Patient variables, including BMI, age, and sex, were evaluated between patients who had inappropriately placed contrast and those who did not. RESULTS: Of the 101 hip injections, there were 6 cases that demonstrated inadequate contrast placement within the joint, likely secondary to extravasation or incorrect placement; however, an MR arthrogram was adequately interpreted in all cases. There were no significant differences noted between those with appropriate versus inappropriate contrast placement when evaluating BMI (P = .57), age (P = .33), or sex (P = .67), and neither group had an adverse event. CONCLUSION: US-guided injections are safe and accurate alternatives to fluoroscopy-guided injections in the office setting, with 94% accuracy. Furthermore, BMI, age, and sex did not play a statistically significant role among patients with inappropriately placed contrast.

2.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 2(11): 2325967114555478, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26535281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An anatomic reconstruction of coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments typically requires drilling tunnels in the clavicle. An increase in fracture complications has been associated with graft tunnel position. A method of drilling clavicle tunnels that would better re-create anatomic function of the CC ligaments without increasing fracture risk would be an improvement. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of a novel single anterior-to-posterior tunnel technique and compare the biomechanical properties to the 2-tunnel technique in CC ligament reconstruction. The hypothesis was that the single tunnel will yield similar loads to failure as the 2-tunnel technique and better reproduce the native anatomy of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen matched pairs of human clavicles underwent testing. In 1 specimen of the matched pair, 2 bone tunnels were created as previously described. In the other, a single tunnel was placed obliquely from anterior to posterior. The relative position of the tunnels in relation to the conoid tuberosity was recorded. Specimens were tested on a materials testing machine. The ultimate load to failure, linear stiffness, distance of the conoid tuberosity to the conoid tunnel exit point, and mode of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The ultimate load to failure in the single-tunnel group and the 2-tunnel group was 457.2 ± 139.8 and 488.8 ± 170.6, respectively. There was no significant difference (P = .5). The linear stiffness in the single-tunnel group and the 2-tunnel group was 94.6 ± 31.3 and 79.8 ± 33.5, respectively. There was no significant difference (P = .2). The 2-tunnel group had a significantly longer average maximum distance from the conoid tuberosity to the conoid tunnel exit point than the single-tunnel group (6.0 ± 2.1 vs 0.8 ± 1.9 mm; P = .05). The single-tunnel group was consistently more anatomic with regard to its relationship to the conoid tuberosity than the 2-tunnel group. CONCLUSION: The single anterior-to-posterior clavicle tunnel had similar biomechanical properties to the 2-tunnel technique. However, the single-tunnel technique better reproduced the anatomic footprint of the conoid ligament. Utilizing this single-tunnel technique may yield an anatomic advantage that may also reduce the rate of complications caused by posterior wall blowout. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Acromioclavicular joint injuries are common in collision sports. Surgical management is often indicated to reconstruct the joint. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel surgical approach.

3.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 40(4): E61-3, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21731933

ABSTRACT

We conducted a study to characterize compression forces and pullout strengths of 4 commercially available bioabsorbable nails and screws in a synthetic bone model. A piezoelectric sensor was used to measure peak compression forces, and a material testing machine was used to measure maximum pullout strengths. The strongest compression force was found for SmartScrew (12.7 N), then SmartNail (12.3 N), LactoNail (8.5 N), and ReUnite Screw (5.1 N). Mean compression force was significantly (P<.05) different between LactoNail and SmartScrew, ReUnite Screw and SmartNail, and ReUnite Screw and SmartScrew. The most pullout strength was found for SmartScrew (530 N), then ReUnite Screw (414 N), SmartNail (336 N), and LactoNail (189 N). These values were all statistically significantly (P<.05) different from each other. In this model, SmartScrew had the overall strongest compression force and most pullout strength.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Bone Nails , Bone Screws , Cartilage, Articular/surgery , Materials Testing/methods , Prosthesis Failure , Compressive Strength , Humans , Joint Instability/prevention & control , Models, Anatomic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...