ABSTRACT
Enterovesical fistula represents an abnormal communication between the urinary bladder and the gastrointestinal tract. It can result spontaneously from different disease processes, but can also complicate a surgical procedure. While most involve the large bowel, few involve the small bowel and these present with more clinical problems, as well as challenges in diagnosis and management. The patient is a 50-year-old P8 +0, woman who presented to our facility with a 6 months' history of faecaluria. There was associated history of urinary frequency, urgency, pneumaturia and dysuria. She had subtotal hysterectomy 6 years prior to presentation. Cystography, Abdominal computed tomography scan, and cystoscopy done revealed a small bowel fistula with the bladder. She had exploratory laparotomy which revealed the fistula and extensive intra-abdominal nylon suturing of bladder and jejunum. She was treated and did well postoperatively. Enterovesical fistula can follow wrong suture use in surgical procedures even many years after the procedure. A high index of suspicion and imaging modalities are needed for early diagnosis and prompt management.
ABSTRACT
Background: Management of urethral stricture disease remains a challenge in the field of urology. Though several options exist for its management, urethroplasty has proved to give the best outcome. Methodology: This is a retrospective study of urethral strictures and urethroplasties for 5years spanning from January 2015 to December 2019 at a tertiary teaching hospital in Anambra, South East Nigeria. Data was retrieved from the case notes of all the urethral strictures cases which presented to our facility in these 5 years and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Results: A total of 186 patients were diagnosed with urethral stricture disease within the 5 years' period. However, only 28 (15.1%) of them had urethroplasty within the period, mostly due to lack of fund. Of those who had urethroplasty, their ages ranged from 4 - 64 years with a median of 29.50 years. Motor vehicular road traffic accident (RTA) was the most common (46.43%) aetiology. Excision and anastomosis was the most common type of urethroplasty performed (71.43%) and the most common complication was stricture recurrence (32.14%). Conclusion: Though urethroplasty techniques have become more refined, accessibility of care continues to hamper treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa due to socioeconomic issues.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer has an increasing global burden. The clinical course varies from an indolent disease to a rapidly aggressive cancer. It is associated with higher mortality in less developed nations due to late presentation. The Gleason scoring system for prostatic adenocarcinoma has prognostic implications in diagnosed cases. Obesity has been associated with the evolution of many cancers including prostate cancer. There are conflicting reports on the relationship between obesity, as measured by body mass index (BMI), and prostate cancer aggressiveness, as measured by Gleason score. This study is aimed to determine if a correlation exists between BMI and Gleason score in men with prostate cancer. METHODOLOGY: This was a prospective, hospital-based, cross-sectional study involving consecutive patients with prostate cancer. Clinical evaluation including anthropometry, digital rectal examination, and relevant investigations were done for each patient and data collected with pro forma. This was followed by prostate needle biopsy and those diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate had their Gleason grades and scores obtained. Data were analyzed statistically using Spearman Correlation. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 69.54 ± 8.61 years (range 47-83 years). The BMI ranged from 16.98 to 36.45 kg/m2, with a mean of 27.03 ± 5.03 kg/m2. Twenty-six of the patients (36.1%) were overweight and 34.7% were obese. The mean total prostate-specific antigen was 118.65 ± 84.43 ng/ml, with a range of 31-406 ng/ml. The modal Gleason score was 9 with a range of 4-10. There was a strong positive correlation between BMI and Gleason score (r = 0.817, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: The BMI of patients with prostate cancer correlated positively with their Gleason score.
