ABSTRACT
During annual rounds of mass treatment against onchocerciasis, women who are pregnant or nursing neonates should not to be offered ivermectin. The aim of the present study was to determine how many women were not treated, as a result of this policy, in four villages in south-eastern Nigeria. Of the 1714 women of reproductive age present during the 2000 round of mass treatment, 599 (35%) were excluded because they were pregnant or nursing babies aged < 1 month. Most (56%) of the 599 excluded women were, however, treated individually later in the year. Of the 264 excluded women who did not receive a dose of ivermectin at all in 2000, 123 (47%) said they would have actively sought ivermectin treatment had they been made aware of the short duration of exclusion for nursing. If they had all known of the short duration of the exclusion and when and how to locate and receive treatment in their villages after the round of mass treatment, 91% of the women excluded from the round of mass treatment would probably have been treated later in the year. Better treatment systems, follow-up and health education, targeted at pregnant and lactating women, would improve treatment coverage of this group after parturition and early nursing.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Filaricides , Ivermectin , Onchocerciasis/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Parasitic/epidemiology , Adult , Contraindications , Female , Filaricides/administration & dosage , Government Programs , Health Education , Health Services Research , Humans , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Nigeria/epidemiology , Onchocerciasis/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , PregnancyABSTRACT
The prevalence of onchocercosis was determined in three Local Government Areas (Ezeagu, Oji-River and Uzo-Uwani) in Enugu State, Eastern Nigeria between March 1989 and June 1990. Enugu State was shown to be mesoendemic for onchocercosis. A total of 7472 (26.9%) persons out of 27,831 examined were positive for skin microfilariae. There was no significant difference in infection rates between males (27.6%) and females (26.2%). Of the 118 villages surveyed only five had no inhabitant with skin microfilariae. There was a progressive increase of prevalence to the second decade of life, although 96.6% of cases with skin microfilariae had only a light infection. Onchocercomata prevalence was recorded as 27.3% which tallies with the prevalence of skin microfilariae at 26.9% hence onchocercomata prevalence may be used as a yardstick for predicting skin microfilariae prevalence.
