Lower self-reported ART adherence among adolescents in boarding schools compared to day schools.

INTRODUCTION: Adolescents living with HIV (ALH) have poorer adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) than adults. Many ALH in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are enrolled in boarding schools where stigma is pervasive and may impact adherence. METHODS: We collected sociodemographic data, school information, medical history, and viral load (VL) data from ALH age 14-19 in 25 HIV clinics in 3 counties in Kenya. Using generalized estimating equations, we compared ART adherence in ALH attending day and boarding schools. RESULTS: Of 880 ALH, 798 (91%) were enrolled in school, of whom 189 (24%) were in boarding schools. Of those in school, median age was 16 (IQR: 15, 18), 55% were female, 78% had a parent as a primary caregiver, and 74% were on DTG-based ART. Median age at ART initiation was 6 years (IQR 3, 10).Overall, 227 (29%) ALH self-reported missing ART when school was in session (40% in boarding and 25% in day school). After adjusting for sociodemographic and HIV care characteristics, ALH in boarding schools were significantly more likely to self-report missing ART than those in day schools (adjusted Prevalence Ratio (aPR): 1.47, 95% CI 1.18, 1.83, p=0.001). Among 194 ALH, only 60% had undetectable (<20 copies/ml) HIV viral load (62% day schools and 51% boarding schools)(p=0.097). CONCLUSION: ALH had high self-reported non-adherence overall, with worse adherence among those in boarding schools. Schools remain a critical untapped resource for improving ALH outcomes.

"We can tell a good teacher who cares, understands, and can be confidential about it": youth and caregiver experiences with HIV disclosure to schools in Kenya.

Introduction: Disclosure of one's HIV status to others is often difficult due to the fear of stigma. However, disclosure may facilitate receiving social support. Many youth living with HIV (YLH) are enrolled in school as better treatments have improved the health and survival of children with HIV. There is no structured process for disclosure at school for YLH and their caregivers. We sought to understand school disclosure experiences among YLH and their caregivers and assess the need for the development of a structured disclosure intervention tailored to school settings. Methods: We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 28 school-going YLH aged 14-19 years and 24 caregivers of YLH. Interviews were conducted in English and Swahili, transcribed, and translated. The transcripts were uploaded to Atlas.ti 9 for thematic analysis. Results: YLH and caregivers clearly articulated the benefits of disclosing to school staff. Disclosure to school staff was seen as the first step to receiving support for medication storage, adherence, and clinic attendance. However, disclosure was also perceived to be a very complicated and stressful process. Fear of stigma drove caregivers and YLH toward careful planning of when and to whom to disclose. Distrust of school staff was a significant barrier to disclosure, even among those who clearly articulated the benefits of disclosure. Disclosure to school staff largely resulted in positive experiences; the immediate reactions were positive or somewhat neutral and confidentiality was upheld. The anticipated benefits of practical and emotional support were demonstrated by the school staff to whom the HIV information was disclosed. Conclusion: Disclosure of HIV status to someone at school is necessary to receive support for medication adherence. Stigma and the lack of structured support for the disclosure process at school often hinder YLH and their caregivers from disclosing. YLH would benefit from better support at schools, including policies to facilitate disclosure that address the caregiver and YLH's fear of stigma and loss of confidentiality. School policies could also provide guidance on whom to disclose to and available post-disclosure support.

'They should show them love even if their status of being HIV positive is known': Youth and caregiver stigma experience and strategies to end HIV stigma in schools.

OBJECTIVE: HIV stigma and discrimination is widespread in sub-Saharan Africa and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Schools play a critical role in the life of youth and have been identified as a potentially stigmatising environment. We sought to explore school HIV stigma drivers, facilitators, manifestations and outcomes among youth living with HIV (YLH) as well as potential stigma reduction interventions in Kenya. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews with 28 school-attending YLH aged 14-19 years and 24 caregivers of YLH were analysed using directed content analysis. Results were summarised using the Health and Stigma Framework. RESULTS: Drivers and facilitators of HIV stigma in the school environment included misconceptions about HIV transmission, HIV treatment outcomes and long-term overall health of people living with HIV. HIV stigma manifested largely as gossip, isolation and loss of friendships. Fear of HIV stigma or experienced stigma resulted in poor adherence to antiretroviral treatment-particularly among YLH in boarding schools-and poor mental health. Stigma also impacted school choice (boarding vs. day school) and prevented HIV disclosure to schools which was necessary for optimal support for care. Proposed interventions to address HIV stigma in schools included HIV education, psychosocial support for YLH, support for HIV disclosure to schools while ensuring confidentiality and building YLH resilience. CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need to develop interventions to address HIV stigma in schools to ensure optimised health and social outcomes for YLH. Future studies to understand the most effective and efficient interventions are needed.

From research to international scale-up: stakeholder engagement essential in successful design, evaluation and implementation of paediatric HIV testing intervention.

Stakeholder engagement between researchers, policymakers and practitioners is critical for the successful translation of research into policy and practice. The Counseling and Testing for Children at Home (CATCH) study evaluated a paediatric index case testing model, targeting the children of HIV-infected adults in care in Kenya. Researchers collaborated with stakeholders in the planning, execution and evaluation, and dissemination phases of CATCH. They included a community advisory board, the national HIV programme, County health departments, institutional ethics review bodies, a paediatric bioethics group, facility heads and frontline healthcare workers . Stakeholder analysis considered the power and interest of each stakeholder in the study. All stakeholders had some power to influence the success of the project in the different phases. However, support from institutions with higher hierarchical power increased acceptance of the study by stakeholders lower in the hierarchy. During the planning, execution and evaluation, and dissemination phases, the study benefitted from deliberate stakeholder engagement. Through engagement, changes were made in the approach to recruitment to ensure high external validity, placing recruitment optimally within existing clinic flow patterns. Choices in staffing home visits were made to include the appropriate cadre of staff. Adaptations were made to the consenting process that balanced the child's evolving autonomy and risks of HIV disclosure. Dissemination involved delivering site-specific results in each HIV clinic, local and international conferences and sharing of study tools, resulting in the study approach being scaled up nationally. The deliberate engagement of stakeholders early in intervention development optimized study validity and accelerated adoption of the CATCH approach in nationwide HIV testing campaigns by the Ministry of Health and inclusion of paediatric index-case testing in national HIV testing guidelines. Involving policymakers and frontline healthcare workers throughout the study cycle builds capacity in the implementing team for quick adoption and scale-up of the evidence-based practice.