HCC Liver Transplantation Wait List Dropout Rates Before and After the Mandated 6-Month Wait Time.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown significant improvement in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence rates after liver transplantation since the united network of organ sharing (UNOS) implementation of a 6-month wait period prior to accrued exception model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) points enacted on October 8, 2015. However, few have examined the impact on HCC dropout rates for patients awaiting liver transplant. Our objective is to evaluate the outcomes of HCC dropout rates before and after the mandatory 6-month wait policy enacted. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on adult patients added to the liver transplant wait list between January 1, 2012, and March 8, 2019 (n = 767). Information was obtained through electronic medical records and organ procurement and transplant network (OPTN) publicly available national data reports. RESULTS: In response to the 2015 UNOS-mandated 6-month wait time, dropout rates in the HCC patient population at our center increased from 12% pre-mandate to 20.8% post-mandate This increase was similarly reflected in the national dropout rate, which also increased from 26.3% pre-mandate to 29.0% post-mandate. DISCUSSION: From these changes, it is evident that the UNOS mandate achieved its goal of increasing equity of liver organ allocation, but HCC patients are nonetheless dropping off of the wait list at an increased rate and are therefore disadvantaged.

Cost Utilization and the Use of Pulmonary Function Tests in Preoperative Liver Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are currently recommended for liver transplant candidates. We hypothesized that PFTs may not provide added clinical value to the evaluation of liver transplant patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult cadaveric liver transplants from 2012 to 2018. Abnormal PFTs were defined as restrictive disease of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <80% or obstructive disease of ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first 1 second to the first vital capacity of the lungs (FEV1/FVC) <70%. RESULTS: We analyzed data on 415 liver transplant patients (358 abnormal PFT results and 57 normal results). The liver transplant patients with abnormal PFTs had no difference in number of intensive care unit (ICU) days (P = .68), length of stay (P = .24), or intubation days (P = .33). There were no differences in pulmonary complications including pleural effusion (P = .30), hemo/pneumothorax (P = .74), pneumonia (P = .66), acute respiratory distress syndrome (P = .57), or pulmonary edema (P = .73). The significant finding between groups was a higher rate of reintubation in liver transplant patients with normal PFTs (P = .02). There was no difference in graft survival (P = .53) or patient survival (P = .42). DISCUSSION: Abnormal PFTs, found in 86% of liver transplant patients, did not correlate with complications, graft failure, or mortality. PFTs contribute to the high cost of liver transplants but do not help predict which patients are at risk of postoperative complications.

Pre-Liver Transplant Coronary Artery Disease Workup for Low-Risk Patients.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality following orthotopic liver transplant, yet there is no standardized protocol for pre-liver-transplant coronary artery disease assessment. The main objective of this study was to determine the agreement between 2 methods of cardiac risk assessment: dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE) and coronary calcium score (CCS) and to determine which test was best able to predict coronary calcification in low-risk patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the medical records of 436 patients who received cardiac clearance for a liver transplant. A total of 152 patients' medical records were included based on the inclusion of patients who had received both DSE and CCS. A kappa coefficient was calculated to determine the agreement between the DSE and CCS results. In addition, the positive predictive values (PPVs) of both the CCS and DSE along with cardiac catheterization indicating abdominal occlusion were analyzed to compare the accuracy of the 2 tests. RESULTS: It was determined that there was a 12% agreement between DSE results and CCS. It was found that the DSE had a PPV of 56% and the CCS had a PPV of 80%. CONCLUSION: From this data, it was concluded that there was no agreement between the results of the CCS and the DSE. While neither the CCS nor the DSE presents an optimal method of risk assessment, the CCS had a much higher PPV and was therefore determined to be the more accurate test.