[Diaries for critically ill patients]. / Tagebücher für kritisch kranke Patienten.

After a stay on an intensive care unit (ICU), patients and relatives may be affected by psychological consequences such as anxiety, depression or posttraumatic stress disorder. ICU diaries written for patients during the stay by clinicians and relatives can alleviate the consequences. Diaries can contribute to the humanization of intensive care through the person-centered approach. A case report illustrates the perspective and benefits from a patient's perspective.

[The Early Mobilization Network]. / Netzwerk Frühmobilisierung.

BACKGROUND: Since its foundation in 2011, the German Network for Early Mobilization of mechanically ventilated intensive care patients delivered, among others, more than 90 monthly newsletters, 14 research projects, and 3 national conferences. PURPOSE: The aim of this online survey was to evaluate whether members of the Network perceived a professional benefit for themselves and their intensive cate units (ICU). METHODS: An interprofessional online survey of 303 clinicians of the Network in German speaking countries in July 2019 was undertaken. The survey included questions about newsletters, personal benefits, perceived improvements on their workplaces, and future expectations. RESULTS: The response rate was 48% (n = 145), mainly nurses and physiotherapists. The majority perceived the newsletter as good. Members reported that the network extended their professional knowledge and improved the quality of the ICUs regarding early mobilization, delirium management, and interprofessional goals. Participants expressed a wish for more workshops, case reports, webinars, and other educational possibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Members of the network Early Mobilization perceived a personal and professional benefit. The network supported quality improvements projects in ICUs. The progress of the network may serve as an example for development of other professional networks.

[Study protocol to improve the quality of delirium management in intensive care]. / Protokoll einer Studie zur Qualitätsverbesserung des Delirmanagements auf der Intensivstation.

BACKGROUND: Delirium in cardiac surgery patients is common and is associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as higher mortality. Protocols may improve outcome. In our cardiac surgery intensive care unit (ICU), patients with delirium have not received standardized treatment so far. HYPOTHESIS: In cardiac surgery ICU patients, standardized delirium management will lead after a 4­week introduction, compared to nonstandardized treatment, to a reduction of delirium duration. METHODS: Prospective before/after study to evaluate a quality improvement project for delirium management over 12 weeks including 140 patients. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (a) ≥18 years, (b) consent for research with their data. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (a) palliative status, (b) present during both the before/after phase, (c) pregnancy, (d) included in a competitive study, or (e) delirium not assessable. The implementation includes the introduction of a protocol with interprofessional training, bedside-teaching, pocket cards, posters, and reminders. The primary outcome is the duration of delirium, assessed four times a day with validated instruments. Secondary outcome measures include delirium incidence, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU and hospital, mortality, nursing/therapeutic interventions, cumulative doses of delirium-related drugs, and complications of delirium for a follow-up of 28 days. Empirical data will be analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is a reduction of the duration and frequency of delirium in cardiac ICU patients and will provide evidence of the effect size of the introduction of a delirium management.

[Diaries for intensive care unit patients reduce the risk for psychological sequelae : Systematic literature review and meta-analysis]. / Intensivtagebücher senken Risiko für psychische Folgestörungen : Systematische Literaturrecherche und Metaanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Diaries are written for patients on intensive care units (ICU) by clinicians and relatives to reduce the risk of psychological complications such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. The authors of a Cochrane Review on this topic published in 2015, included studies with PTSD diagnoses based on interviews carried out by qualified personnel, and concluded that there is inadequate evidence to support the thesis that ICU diaries reduce the risk of psychological complications. METHODS: The present study replicated the design of the Cochrane Review with identical search algorithms, but included additional outcomes data from validated methods of diagnosing psychological complications that were not considered in the original Cochrane Review. The primary outcome was PTSD in patients or relatives with ICU diaries. Secondary outcomes were anxiety and/or depression symptoms. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: The replicated search produced 3179 citations, of which there were 6 eligible studies from which 605 patients and 145 relatives could be included in the meta-analysis. Studies ratings ranged from low to good. The meta-analyses of the PTSD outcome demonstrated the following: (a) for ICU patients (4 studies, n = 569 patients) a non-significant reduction (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-1.42, p = 0.23), and (b) for relatives' PTSD (2 studies, n = 145 relatives) a significant reduction (OR 0.17, 95%CI: 0.08-0.38, p < 0.0001). The symptoms anxiety and depression in ICU patients (2 studies each, n = 88 patients) were significantly reduced (OR 0.23, 95%CI: 0.07-0.77, p = 0.02; OR 0.27, 95%CI: 0.09-0.77, p = 0.01, respectively). Heterogeneity was between 0 and 54%. CONCLUSION: ICU diaries may reduce the risk of psychological complications in patients and relatives after ICU stays.

[PROtocol-based MObilizaTION on intensive care units : Design of a cluster randomized pilot study]. / PROtokollbasierte MObilisierung auf IntensivstaTIONen : Design einer clusterrandomisierten Pilotstudie.

BACKGROUND: Despite convincing evidence for early mobilization of patients on intensive care units (ICU), implementation in practice is limited. Protocols for early mobilization, including in- and exclusion criteria, assessments, safety criteria, and step schemes may increase the rate of implementation and mobilization. HYPOTHESIS: Patients (population) on ICUs with a protocol for early mobilization (intervention), compared to patients on ICUs without protocol (control), will be more frequently mobilized (outcome). METHODS: A multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot study is presented. Five ICUs will receive an adapted, interprofessional protocol for early mobilization in randomized order. Before and after implementation, mobilization of ICU patients will be evaluated by randomized monthly one-day point prevalence surveys. Primary outcome is the percentage of patients mobilized out of bed, operationalized as a score of ≥3 on the ICU Mobility Scale. Secondary outcome parameters will be presence and/or length of mechanical ventilation, delirium, stay on ICU and in hospital, barriers to early mobilization, adverse events, and process parameters as identified barriers, used strategies, and adaptions to local conditions. EXPECTED RESULTS: Exploratory evaluation of study feasibility and estimation of effect sizes as the basis for a future explanatory study.

[Delirium in stroke patients : Critical analysis of statistical procedures for the identification of risk factors]. / Delir bei Patienten mit Schlaganfall : Eine kritische Literaturanalyse zur Feststellung der Risikofaktoren.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a relevant complication following an acute stroke. It is a multifactor occurrence with numerous interacting risk factors that alternately influence each other. PROBLEM: The risk factors of delirium in stroke patients are often based on limited clinical studies. The statistical procedures and clinical relevance of delirium related risk factors in adult stroke patients should therefore be questioned. METHOD: This secondary analysis includes clinically relevant studies that give evidence for the clinical relevance and statistical significance of delirium-associated risk factors in stroke patients. The quality of the reporting of regression analyses was assessed using Ottenbacher's quality criteria. The delirium-associated risk factors identified were examined with regard to statistical significance using the Bonferroni method of multiple testing for forming incorrect positive hypotheses. This was followed by a literature-based discussion on clinical relevance. RESULTS: Nine clinical studies were included. None of the studies fulfilled all the prerequisites and assumptions given for the reporting of regression analyses according to Ottenbacher. Of the 108 delirium-associated risk factors, a total of 48 (44.4%) were significant, whereby a total of 28 (58.3%) were false positive after Bonferroni correction. Following a literature-based discussion on clinical relevance, the assumption of statistical significance and clinical relevance could be found for only four risk factors (dementia or cognitive impairment, total anterior infarct, severe infarct and infections). CONCLUSIONS: The statistical procedures used in the existing literature are questionable, as are their results. A post-hoc analysis and critical appraisal reduced the number of possible delirium-associated risk factors to just a few clinically relevant factors.

[Algorithms for early mobilization in intensive care units]. / Algorithmen zur Frühmobilisierung auf Intensivstationen.

Immobility of patients in intensive care units (ICU) can lead to long-lasting physical and cognitive decline. During the last few years, bundles for rehabilitation were developed, including early mobilization. The German guideline for positioning therapy and mobilization, in general, recommends the development of ICU-specific protocols. The aim of this narrative review is to provide guidance when developing a best practice protocol in one's own field of work. It is recommended to a) implement early mobilization as part of a bundle, including screening and management of patient's awareness, pain, anxiety, stress, delirium and family's presence, b) develop a traffic-light system of specific in- and exclusion criteria in an interprofessional process, c) use checklists to assess risks and preparation of mobilization, d) use the ICU Mobility Scale for targeting and documentation of mobilization, e) use relative safety criteria for hemodynamic and respiratory changes, and Borg Scale for subjective evaluation, f) document and evaluate systematically mobilization levels, barriers, unwanted safety events and other parameters.

[Positioning therapy and early mobilization in intensive care units : Findings from the current 2015 guidelines]. / Lagerungstherapie und Frühmobilisation auf der Intensivstation : Erkenntnisse aus der aktuellen Leitlinie 2015.

The 2007 guidelines "Positioning for prophylaxis and therapy of pulmonary disorders" were completely revised in 2015 on behalf of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. With regard to practical and scientific relevance, early mobilization of patients in critical care has been included in the guidelines for the first time. Furthermore, the recommendations for prone positioning have been updated, based on current evidence in medicine and nursing. In addition, recommendations regarding unsuitable positions that may actually harm patients were made. As such, the flat supine position should only be used in cases of urgent medical or nursing needs. This underlines the importance of a moderately elevated head of bed position (20(o)-45(o)) in mechanically ventilated patients.

[Early mobilization. Competencies, responsibilities, milestones]. / Frühmobilisierung. Zuständigkeiten, Verantwortungen, Meilensteine.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization is an evident, interprofessional concept to improve the outcome of intensive care patients. It reduces psychocognitive deficits and delirium and attenuates a general deconditioning, including atrophy of the respiratory pump and skeletal muscles. In this regard the interdisciplinary approach of early mobilization, taking into account different levels of mobilization, appears to be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to explore opinions on collaboration and tasks between different professional groups. METHOD: During the 25th Bremen Conference on Intensive Medicine and Nursing on 20 February 2015, a questionnaire survey was carried out among the 120 participants of the German Early Mobilization Network meeting. RESULTS: In all, 102 questionnaires were analyzed. Most participants reported on the interdisciplinarity of the approach, but none of the tasks and responsibilities concerning early mobilization can be assigned to a single professional group. The practical implementation of mobilizing orally intubated patients may require two registered nurses as well as a physical therapist. Implementation in daily practice seems to be heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus regarding collaboration, competencies, and responsibilities with respect to early mobilization of intensive care patients. The approach to date has been characterized by a lack of interprofessional communication, which may lead to an inefficient use of the broad and varied base of knowledge and experienceof the different professions.

[Tolerance of endotracheal tubes in patients on mechanical ventilation]. / Toleranz des endotrachealen Tubus bei beatmeten Intensivpatienten.

BACKGROUND: Modern concepts for sedation and analgesia and guidelines recommend light analgesia and sedation, so that patients on mechanically ventilation are more awake, compared to previous concepts. Hence, these patients are more alert and able to experience their situation on the ventilator and their endotracheal tube (ETT). PROBLEM: There is currently no convincing evidence of how patients tolerate the tube under present conditions, which interventions could help them, or whether they want to be sedated deeper because of the tube. Based upon our own observations, a broad range of reactions are possible. PURPOSE: The tolerance of the ETT in intensive care patients was explored. METHOD: A systematic literature research without time constraints in the databases PubMed and CINAHL was performed. Included were quantitative and qualitative studies written in German or English that investigated tolerance of the ETT in adult intensive care patients. Excluded were anesthetic studies including in- and extubation immediately before and after operations. RESULTS: Of the 2348 hits, 14 studies were included, including 4 qualitative studies about the experience of intensive care, 8 quantitative studies including 2 randomized controlled studies, and 2 studies with a mixed approach. Within the studies different aspects could be identified, which may in- or decrease the tolerance of an ETT. Aspects like breathlessness, pain during endotracheal suctioning and inability to speak decrease the tolerance. Information, the presence of relatives and early mobilization appear to increase the tolerance. CONCLUSION: Tolerance of the ETT is a complex phenomenon. A reflected and critical evaluation of the behavior of the patient with an ETT is recommended. Interventions that increase the tolerance of the ETT should be adapted to the situation of the patient and should be evaluated daily.

Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgery.

BACKGROUND: The quality of pain relief during the first 48 hours following ambulatory surgery has been poorly documented. This questionnaire study was performed to evaluate the nature and severity of pain after the patient leaves the hospital. METHODS: 1100 patients in the age group 5-88 years who underwent ambulatory surgery during a period of 6 months were asked to complete a questionnaire 48 h after the end of the operation. In the case of children, parents were asked to complete a similar questionnaire. The questions were related to pain experienced during the first 48 h after surgery and to the nature and severity of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 1035 out of the 1100 patients returned the questionnaire, 94.1%. Overall the majority (65%) of patients had only mild pain at home; however, patients undergoing certain types of surgery had moderate-to-severe pain: inguinal hernia surgery (62% patients), orthopaedic surgery (41%), hand surgery (37%) and varicose vein surgery (36%). In these patients the severity of pain did not decrease during the 2-day study period. About 10% patients had more severe pain than they had anticipated, and 20% had difficulty in sleeping at night due to severe pain. Despite this, over 95% of patients were satisfied with management of postoperative pain. Nausea (20%), tiredness (20%) and vomiting (8%) were the commonest complications reported during the first 48 h. A significant association was found between the administration of a general anaesthetic and the incidence of nausea postoperatively. A large number of patients were alone at home after the operation (28.4%); some (3.8%) had no access to a relative or friend in case of need. CONCLUSION: Our results show that about 35% of day-surgery patients experience moderate-to-severe pain at home in spite of analgesic medication. About 20% of patients had sleep problems due to severe pain. However, only 5% of patients were dissatisfied. Better analgesic techniques are necessary for patients undergoing certain types of surgery. Patient information and follow-up routines need to be improved.

Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% would provide effective analgesia with an acceptably low incidence of motor blockade and side effects after lower abdominal surgery. After combined general and epidural anesthesia and surgery, 125 patients were randomly assigned to receive either saline or ropivacaine 0.2% at a rate of 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14 mL/h (Groups R6, R8, R10, R12, and R14, respectively) for 21 h. Supplemental analgesia, if required, was provided with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. Data were collected at 4, 8, and 21 h, and included morphine consumption, pain scores at rest and with coughing, motor and sensory block, and adverse events. Cumulative morphine consumption was less in Groups R10, R12, and R14 compared with the saline group. At 4 h analgesia was better among patients receiving ropivacaine, but at 21 h pain scores were identical. Sensory blockade at 8 and 21 h was greater in the ropivacaine groups compared with the saline group. Approximately 30% of R8, R10, and R12 patients, and 63% of R14 patients had demonstrable motor block of the lower limbs at 21 hours. We conclude that lumbar epidural ropivacaine 0.2% reduces parenteral morphine requirements but has little effect on pain scores and may be associated with motor blockade.

Evaluation of epidural sensory block by thermal stimulation, laser stimulation, and recording of somatosensory evoked potentials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The existence of differential sensory block during epidural analgesia has been confirmed by some authors and disputed by others. This study attempts to elucidate this issue by using quantitative methods for evaluation of sensory block. METHODS: A single epidural injection of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine was administered at the L1-T12 level in 11 male volunteers. Sensory block was evaluated by two qualitative (pinprick and light touch) and two quantitative methods (thermal stimulation with Thermotest [Somedic, Stockholm, Sweden] and argon laser stimulation). For measurement of motor block in the lower extremities and in the rectus abdominis muscle, quantitative methods were used. Sensory block was also assessed by somatosensory evoked potentials recorded during electrical and laser stimulation at the most cranial analgesic dermatome (loss of sharpness in pinprick perception) and the anesthetic dermatome L2 (loss of light touch perception). RESULTS: The zone of anesthesia was smaller than the zone of any other investigated variable. The cranial spread of analgesia and motor block was lower than that of laser-assessed block. Partial block of laser perception and thermal perception lasted longer than analgesia and motor block. No consistent segmental or temporal differences were found between the Thermotest and laser methods. During epidural block, prolongation of latencies and reduction in amplitudes of somatosensory evoked potentials produced at the most cranial analgesic dermatome did not differ significantly from those produced at the anesthetic dermatome. CONCLUSIONS: No differential block of small nerve fibers was found during epidural analgesia by Thermotest and argon laser stimulation. Recording of somatosensory evoked potentials did not demonstrate significant difference between responses from the sites with most superficial and with most intense sensory block.

The effect of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%) on nerve conduction velocity and postural control in volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusions of local anaesthetics have become increasingly popular in postoperative pain treatment, especially as they permit early mobilisation. Ropivacaine is a promising new agent which induces more pronounced sensory than motor blockade. This study was focused on the influence of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine on impulse conduction in large nerves (by measurement of F and H latencies), and on the subjects' ability to maintain postural control during mobilisation. METHODS: Healthy male volunteers received 0.1%, 0.2% or 0.3% ropivacaine, and bupivacaine 0.25% was used as reference. A bolus epidural injection of 10 ml of the drug, at L2/3 level, was followed by continuous infusion at 10 ml/h for 21 h. Motor blockade was assessed by mechanical measurements of force during big toe flexion and by recording of F latency. Sensory blockade was monitored by pin-prick and Thermotest methods, and by H latency recording. The subjects' ability to perform a postural test was evaluated by posturography. RESULTS: The F and H latencies became prolonged/abolished dose-dependently. With ropivacaine, F latency recovered significantly later than motor function (P = 0.0002), and H latency recovered later than normal pin-prick perception (P = 0.0006). However, the duration of partial blockade of thermoperception was comparable to that of H latency prolongation. Posturographically, the subjects receiving 0.1% ropivacaine differed significantly from all others (P < 0.001) in that they were able to maintain postural control during the infusion. The recovery period after termination of infusion was significantly shorter with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine for all measured variables. CONCLUSION: Recovery of postural control with 0.2% and 0.3% ropivacaine is significantly faster than with bupivacaine 0.25%. H latency recording allows detection of epidural blockade intensity that does not prevent subjects from performing postural tests.

The effect of continuous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine (0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3%) and 0.25% bupivacaine on sensory and motor block in volunteers: a double-blind study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In animal studies, ropivacaine has shown more pronounced sensory block than motor block, which makes it an interesting drug for postoperative pain relief. The aim of this study was to investigate the dose response of sensory and motor block during continuous epidural infusion of 0.1, 0.2, or 0.3% ropivacaine in volunteers in a double-blind manner. Bupivacaine 0.25% and isotonic saline were used as reference and control, respectively. METHODS: Each treatment group consisted of eight healthy men. After a bolus dose of 10 mL at the L2-L3 interspace, the solution in question was infused at 10 mL/h for 21 hours. Sensory block was evaluated by the pinprick, light touch, and Thermotest methods. Motor block was measured by the Bromage scale, by average rectified electromyography in abdominal muscles, and by mechanical measurement of isometric muscle force in the lower extremities. Mobilization of the subjects was attempted throughout the investigation. RESULTS: The number of blocked dermatomes (evaluated by pinprick) with 0.1% ropivacaine was significantly smaller than with the other test solutions (P = .002-.0008). Motor block was minimal with 0.1% ropivacaine, so that all subjects could be mobilized; it was moderate with 0.2 and 0.3% ropivacaine and most intense with 0.25% bupivacaine. The regression phase was significantly shorter with all three concentrations of ropivacaine than with bupivacaine (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine 0.1% produced limited analgesia and minimal motor block, so that ambulation was possible throughout the investigation. With 0.2 and 0.3% ropivacaine, analgesia was more extensive, and motor block was considered moderate. Ropivacaine 0.2% should be evaluated for future postoperative pain treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine during 21 hours of continuous epidural infusion in healthy male volunteers.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and to compare the results with those of bupivacaine during prolonged epidural infusion. Ropivacaine 1, 2, or 3 mg/mL (0.1%, 0.2%, or 0.3%), bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL (0.25%), or placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%) was given randomly and in a double-blind manner to five parallel treatment groups (37 healthy volunteers) as a continuous epidural infusion for 21 h. A 10-mL epidural bolus dose was first given, and the epidural infusion was started immediately afterward. The subjects received 10 mL/h corresponding to infusion rates of 10, 20, or 30 mg/h ropivacaine and 25 mg/h bupivacaine, respectively. Peripheral blood samples for measurements of ropivacaine or bupivacaine were taken during a 25-h period. The total plasma concentration increased continuously but seemed to reach a plateau (C5-10h) after approximately 5 h infusion, remaining fairly constant up to approximately 10 h after the start of administration. The C5-10h values were proportional to the dose of ropivacaine and were estimated as 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9 mg/L, and for bupivacaine as 0.7 mg/L. During the subsequent infusion the plasma concentration increased, with maximum plasma levels at the end of the infusion and with corresponding values of 0.4, 0.9, 1.2, and 0.9 mg/L. The highest individual plasma concentration was 1.7 mg/L (20 mg/h), and no patient showed signs of toxic systemic plasma levels. The free concentrations also increased continuously during the infusion. The free fraction was independent of the dose (6.1% for ropivacaine and 4.8% for bupivacaine).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)