Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 26(10): 1414-20, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11126250

ABSTRACT

Physicians are increasingly involved in how their critically ill patients die [72]. The more this happens, the more physicians will have to understand not only how their own backgrounds and biases influence their medical management, but also the cultural and religious backgrounds of the patient and surrogate [72, 73]. The medical profession must realise that, despite tremendous advances in medical knowledge and technology, not everyone can be saved all the time, even in the area of intensive care. Physicians must understand that "doing everything" that is best for the patient may not mean starting epinephrine or performing CPR, but rather may imply moving from a process of curing to caring with palliative care [10]. This process should be initiated by discussions with the patient or surrogate, and should include knowledge of the patients' wishes as demonstrated by advance directives and durable power of attorney. The patient's code status and the intention of forgoing life-sustaining treatment should be discussed with other members of staff together with the patient and/or family in a compassionate and humane manner. The wishes of the patient and family should be taken into consideration and the physician must try to make an impartial decision by doing what is medically and ethically correct and best for this specific patient. Hopefully, in this way, a more ethical and compassionate approach to end-of-life decisions in the ICU will be obtained.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/psychology , Decision Making , Life Support Care/methods , Life Support Care/psychology , Terminal Care/methods , Terminal Care/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Health , Chronic Disease , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Cultural Characteristics , Europe , Family/psychology , Health Care Rationing , Humans , Life Support Care/statistics & numerical data , Medical Futility , Patient Advocacy , Patient Selection , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Resuscitation Orders , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , United States
4.
Crit Care Clin ; 13(2): 409-15, 1997 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9107516

ABSTRACT

Differences in culture, resources, demand, level of development, and cultural and religious differences may alter ethical approaches around the world. The principles of medical ethics are beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, disclosure of information, and social justice. Difficult decisions as to whom to admit and whom to exclude are faced by physicians internationally. Differences between countries are seen in the withdrawal and withholding of treatments and in the obtaining of informed consent in emergency circumstances.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/standards , Ethics, Medical , Global Health , Intensive Care Units/standards , Internationality , Humans , Informed Consent , Patient Selection , Resource Allocation , Resuscitation Orders , Social Values , Triage , Withholding Treatment
5.
Crit Care Clin ; 12(1): 85-96, 1996 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8821011

ABSTRACT

This article provides a brief review of the history of euthanasia. The problems involved in withholding or withdrawing treatment, physician-assisted suicide, and arguments for or against euthanasia are discussed. Changes in both societal and physician attitudes and practices are presented.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia, Active , Euthanasia , Europe , Euthanasia/history , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary , History, 16th Century , History, 17th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, Ancient , Humans , Internationality , Persons , Social Change , Stress, Psychological , United States , Vulnerable Populations , Wedge Argument , Withholding Treatment
7.
In. U.S. Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC). Mitigation and damage to the built environment. Memphis, Tennessee, U.S. Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC), 1993. p.81-90.
Monography in En | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-6657

ABSTRACT

Critical industrial facilities can be defined as those facilities that could, if damaged release substances harmful to the public or to the environment. From a engineering point of view, critical industries facilities require more stringent critica than general use facilities such as office buildings, but shoult not require critica as stringent as that required for nuclear power plants (AU)


Subject(s)
Earthquakes , Construction Industry , United States , Risk Assessment
8.
In. U.S. Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC). Mitigation and damage to the built environment. Memphis, Tennessee, U.S. Central United States Earthquake Consortium (CUSEC), 1993. p.587-96, ilus.
Monography in En | Desastres -Disasters- | ID: des-6705

ABSTRACT

A 40-inch diameter crude oil pepiline runs from St James, Louisiana. to a terminal near Patoka, Illinois over a distance of 635 miles. This pipelines delivers more that 1.000.000 barrels of crude oil per day, primarilyfrom gulf of Mexico wells and overseas sources, to refineries in the Midwest, The pipeline passes in close proximity to the New madrid Seismic Zone, which is located principally in northeast Arkansas and southeast Missouri. A general assessment of the vulnerability of the 40-inch pipeline to seismic hazards such as liquefaction (lateralspreading and flow slides), landslides (i.e., slope instability), and ground shaking effects (above-ground facilities)was recently conducted. The effects of two levels of earthquakes were evaluated, one with a recurrence interval of 100 years and the other having an intensity equal to the 1811-12 New Madrid earthquake sequence (AU)


Subject(s)
Earthquakes , Risk Assessment , Damage Assessment , United States , National Health Strategies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...