Finding good alternatives to hospitalisation: a data register study in five municipal acute wards in Norway.

BACKGROUND: In Norway, municipal acute wards (MAWs) have been implemented in primary healthcare since 2012. The MAWs were intended to offer decentralised acute medical care 24/7 for patients who otherwise would be admitted to hospital. The aim of this study was to assess whether the MAW represents the alternative to hospitalisation as intended, through 1) describing the characteristics of patients intended as candidates for MAWs by primary care physicians, 2) exploring the need for extended diagnostics prior to admission in MAWs, and 3) exploring factors associated with patients being transferred from the MAWs to hospital. METHODS: The study was based on register data from five MAWs in Norway in the period 2014-2020. RESULTS: In total, 16 786 admissions were included. The median age of the patients was 78 years, 60% were women, and the median length of stay was three days. Receiving oral medication (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.40), and the MAW being located nearby the hospital (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.92-2.72) were factors associated with patients admitted to MAW after extended diagnostics. Patients needing advanced treatment, such as oxygen therapy (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.81-2.51), intravenous medication (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.45-1.81), intravenous fluid therapy (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.47) and MAWs with long travel distance from the MAW to the hospital (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.74) had an increased odds for being transferred to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that MAWs do not represent the alternative to hospitalisation as intended. The results show that patients receiving extended diagnostics before admission to MAW got basic treatment, while patients in need of advanced medical treatment were transferred to hospital from a MAW. This indicates that there is still a potential to develop MAWs in order to fulfil the intended health service level.

What if something happens tonight? A qualitative study of primary care physicians' perspectives on an alternative to hospital admittance.

BACKGROUND: Due to demographic changes, hospital emergency departments in many countries are overcrowded. Internationally, several primary healthcare models have been introduced as alternatives to hospitalisation. In Norway, municipal acute wards (MAWs) have been implemented as primary care wards that provide observation and medical treatment for 24 h. The intention is to replace hospitalisation for patients who require acute admission but not specialist healthcare services. The aim of this study was to explore primary care physicians' (PCPs') perspectives on admission to a MAW as an alternative to hospitalisation. METHODS: The study had a qualitative design, including interviews with 21 PCPs in a county in southeastern Norway. Data were analysed with a thematic approach. RESULTS: The PCPs described uncertainty when referring patients to the MAW because of the fewer diagnostic opportunities there than in the hospital. Admission of patients to the MAW was assumed to be unsafe for both PCPs, MAW nurses and physicians. The PCPs assumed that medical competence was lower at the MAW than in the hospital, which led to scepticism about whether their tentative diagnoses would be reconsidered if needed and whether a deterioration of the patients' condition would be detected. When referring patients to a MAW, the PCPs experienced disagreements with MAW personnel about the suitability of the patient. The PCPs emphasised the importance of patients' and relatives' participation in decisions about the level of treatment. Nevertheless, such participation was not always possible, especially when patients' wishes conflicted with what PCPs considered professionally sound. CONCLUSIONS: The PCPs reported concerns regarding the use of MAWs as an alternative to hospitalisation. These concerns were related to fewer diagnostic opportunities, lower medical expertise throughout the day, uncertainty about the selection of patients and challenges with user participation. Consequently, these concerns had an impact on how the PCPs utilised MAW services.

Competence in caring for patients with respiratory insufficiency: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare nurses' self-assessed competence and perceived need for more training in intensive care units treating patients with respiratory insufficiency before and after completion of a seven-hour educational programme, and to assess whether factors such as age, educational level, years of experience and percentage of employment are associated with these outcomes. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: The study had a quantitative, cross-sectional, descriptive design, with two measurement times. The ProffNurse SAS questionnaire was used to assess nurses' self-assessed competence and perceived need for more training. SETTING: Nurses in one medical/surgical intensive care unit and one medical intensive care unit in a hospital in Norway. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nurses' self-assessed competence and perceived need for more training. RESULTS: The pre- and post-education studies comprised responses from 85 (52%) and 52 (32%) nurses, respectively. The educational programme contributed to increased self-assessed competence in seven items. Self-assessed competence was significantly associated with nurses' educational level, and critical care nurses reported higher self-assessed competence than registered nurses on 50% of the items. CONCLUSION: The findings fill a gap in knowledge about nurses' competence in treating patients with respiratory insufficiency in intensive care units. Both education days and further education have beneficial effects on self-assessed competence.