Primary tumour resection and survival in the palliative management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

AIM: To examine whether surgical resection of the primary tumour confers a survival benefit and to identify the predictive factors of outcome in patients presenting with asymptomatic metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of a hospital database in a tertiary institution over a 6-year period (1999-2005) revealed 70 patients with asymptomatic primary CRC and unresectable liver metastases treated initially by systemic chemotherapy. A multivariate regression analysis model was used to determine the relative influence of multiple tumours, single/multiple liver metastases, tumour site, differentiation, response of liver and primary tumour to chemotherapy, biochemical response to chemotherapy, age at presentation, performance status and surgical intervention for the CRC primary. RESULTS: In 67 cases (3 lost to follow-up), 63 had multiple and 4 single surgically irresectable liver metastases. A total of 41 deaths were recorded. All patients received systemic chemotherapy and surgery was performed for bowel obstruction, bleeding or stable disease (n=32). Surgery (OR 0.26; p=0.00013) and clinical response of the primary tumour (OR 0.53; p=0.012) were independently associated with prolonged survival. Proximal tumours (OR 2.61; p=0.0075) and multiple primaries (OR 3.37; p=0.02) were associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection and response of the primary tumour to chemotherapy may be associated with improved survival, but proximal or multiple cancers predict poor outcome in patients with asymptomatic CRC and unresectable metastatic disease.

Chemical colostomy irrigation with glyceryl trinitrate solution.

PURPOSE: Colostomy irrigation may improve patient quality of life, but is time consuming. This study tests the hypothesis that irrigation with glyceryl trinitrate solution, by inducing gastrointestinal smooth muscle relaxation, may accelerate expulsion of stool by passive emptying, thereby reducing irrigation time. METHODS: Fifteen colostomy irrigators(with more than 3 years' experience) performed washout with tap water compared with water containing 0.025 mg/kg glyceryl trinitrate. Fluid inflow time, total washout time, and hemodynamic changes occurring during glyceryl trinitrate irrigation were documented by an independent observer. Subjects recorded episodes of fecal leakage and overall satisfaction on a visual analog scale. Cramps, headaches, and whether or not a stoma bag was used were expressed as a percentage of number of irrigations. Comparison of fluid inflow time, total washout time, leakage, and satisfaction was by Wilcoxon's signed-rank test and headaches, cramps, and stoma bag use was by McNemar's test. Pulse rate (paired t-test), systolic and diastolic blood pressures (Wilcoxon's test) at 20 and 240 minutes after washout with glyceryl trinitrate solution were compared with baseline. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (9 female), with a mean age of 53 (31-73) years, provided 30 sessions (15 with water and 15 with glyceryl trinitrate). Medians (interquartile ranges) for water vs. glyceryl trinitrate were fluid inflow time 7 (4-10) vs. 4, (3-5; P = 0.001); total washout time 40 (30-55) vs. 21, (15-24; P < 0.001); leakage 0 (0-1) vs. 0, (0-0; P = 0.02), satisfaction 10 (8-10) vs. 10 (9-10; P = 0.31). The number (percentage) of stoma bags, cramps, and headaches with water vs. glyceryl trinitrate were 7 (47 percent) vs. 7 (47 percent), P = 1; 1 (7 percent) vs. 14 (93 percent), P < 0.001; and 0(0 percent) vs. 14 (93 percent), P < 0.001, respectively. Changes in pulse (increase) and systolic and diastolic blood pressures (decrease) from baseline were maximal at 20 minutes (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively) and had returned to baseline by 240 minutes (P = 0.52, P = 0.08, and P = 1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Glyceryl trinitrate solution significantly reduces colostomy irrigation time compared with the generally recommended tap water. Patients suffer fewer leakages and are highly satisfied, but side effects are potential drawbacks. Other colonoplegic agent solutions should now be evaluated.

Experimental model of anorectal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal transplantation with pudendal nerve anastomosis after rectal excision is a possible strategy that would avoid a colostomy and recreate potentially normal anorectal function. This study investigates the technical feasibility of anorectal transplantation with pudendal nerve and inferior mesenteric artery and vein anastomosis in a porcine model. METHODS: Four female pigs (22-42 kg) provided donor anorectum for four male recipients (29-39 kg) under standard general anaesthesia. The donor operation involved abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APR) taking the anal sphincter, pudendal neurovascular bundle and inferior mesenteric vessels. The recipient underwent APR, transperineal introduction of the donor graft, anastomoses of the rectum, inferior mesenteric vessels and pudendal neurovascular bundle, and perineal closure. Recorded variables were duration of each step of transplantation, ischaemic time, dimensions of anastomosed structures and postoperative graft viability. Animals were killed at 24 h, the state of the graft was noted and tissue was taken for confirmatory histology. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 372 (range 303-435)min. Mean ischaemic time was 118 (100-130)min. Before death, observation at laparotomy revealed two pink grafts, one slightly dusky but healthy graft and one outright failure, reflecting the state of the mesenteric vessels, which were patent in three and thrombosed in one. Histological examination showed no difference between control biopsies and the three cases with satisfactory mesenteric flow. Gross ischaemia was present histologically in the failed case. CONCLUSION: Anorectal transplantation is technically feasible in a pig model. Longer-term studies are now needed to assess return of function and overcome rejection issues.

Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Stapled haemorrhoidectomy does not involve dissection, with its attendant potential morbidity, required to perform closed haemorrhoidectomy. This study compared haemorrhoidectomy with (sutured) and without (stapled) preliminary dissection. METHODS: Forty patients with prolapsed symptomatic haemorrhoids were randomly assigned to sutured (n = 20) or stapled (n = 20) haemorrhoidectomy. Preoperative assessment was by proctoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and anal manometry. Stapled and diathermy haemorrhoidectomies with wound suture were performed, and excised tissue was examined histologically. Pain scores, complications, wound healing and patient satisfaction were recorded. Follow-up was weekly for 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months; anal manometry was repeated at the last two visits. RESULTS: Postoperative resting and squeeze pressures were reduced by the stapled method at 3 months (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03 respectively), returning to baseline by 6 months. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy was quicker but initial access into the anus was hampered by the bulky stapler. Isolated muscle fibres were identified equally in both groups, but incontinence did not occur. The stapled technique resulted in less postoperative pain (P = 0.04), a greater degree of satisfaction (P = 0.01) and faster wound healing (P < 0.001), but was more expensive. There was no significant difference in complications. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher cost and difficult access, stapled haemorhoidectomy results in less postoperative pain, faster wound healing and greater patient satisfaction than the sutured technique.

Experimental study of faecal continence and colostomy irrigation.

BACKGROUND: Colostomy irrigation is a useful method of achieving faecal continence in selected conditions, but remains largely underutilized because it is time consuming. This study investigated the effect of modifying irrigation technique (route, infusion regimen and pharmacological manipulation) on colonic emptying time in a porcine model. METHODS: An end-colostomy and caecostomy were fashioned in six pigs. Twenty markers were introduced into the caecum immediately before colonic irrigation. Irrigation route (antegrade or retrograde), infusion regimen (tap water, polyethylene glycol (PEG), 1.5 per cent glycine) and pharmacological agent (glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) 0.25 mg/kg, diltiazem 3.9 mg/kg, bisacodyl 0.25 mg/kg) were assigned to each animal at random. Colonic transit was assessed by quantifying cumulative expelled markers (CEM) and stool every hour for 12 h. RESULTS: Mean CEM at 6 h for bisacodyl, GTN and diltiazem were 18.17, 12.17 and zero respectively; all pairwise differences in means were significant (P < 0.001). The difference at 12 h between the two routes (P = 0.001) and three fluids (tap water 6.75, glycine 14.83, PEG 16.33; P < 0. 001) was significant, but not for PEG versus glycine and bisacodyl versus GTN. Cumulative output was significantly more with the antegrade than retrograde route using PEG, but the difference in mean cumulative output for bisacodyl and GTN at 12 h was not significant. CONCLUSION: Colonic emptying is more efficient with antegrade than retrograde irrigation. PEG and glycine enhance emptying similar to bisacodyl and GTN solution. These findings show promise for improved faecal continence by colostomy irrigation and may justify construction of a Malone conduit at the time of colostomy in selected patients who wish to irrigate. Presented in part to the British Society of Gastroenterology in Glasgow, UK, March 1999, and published in abstract form as Gut 1999; 44(Suppl 1): A135

New, simple approach for maximal pudendal nerve exposure: anomalies and prospects for functional reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Functional neosphincters after pudendal nerve anastomosis proved possible in animal models and may be applicable in humans, but access is a recognized problem. We report the occurrence of pudendal nerve anomalies, its implications for reconstruction, and describe a new approach for maximal exposure. METHODS: Adult human cadavers were positioned prone and dissected via a gluteal approach. Pudendal nerve variations and physical measurements were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: A new, simple, four-step approach (surface landmarks and exposure of gluteus maximus muscle, sacrotuberous ligament, and pudendal neurovascular bundle) permitted optimal pudendal nerve exposure in all 14 human cadavers (28 limbs). Six were males and had a mean age of 82 (range, 58-102) years. Two anomalies, Type 1 (2-trunked) and Type 2 (3-trunked), of the pudendal nerve were recognized in 30 percent of cadavers, with a left-to-right ratio of 2.5:1. Mean pudendal nerve length over the ischial spine was 23.9 (range, 19-28) mm right, 24.2 (range, 19-28) mm left (P = 0.54), but its diameter measured 5.2 mm (right) and 4.9 mm (left; P = 0.04). Mean length of pudendal nerve trunk exposed after reflection of the sacrotuberous ligament was 55 (range, 44-75) mm on either side before division into terminal branches. The number and percent frequency of inferior rectal nerve on both sides were 1 (13 percent), 2 (76 percent), and 3 (11 percent), respectively, with a mean length of 27.1 (range, 21-34) mm right and 27.9 (range, 20-33) mm left (P = 0.31). CONCLUSION: A simple four-step approach to the pudendal nerve contributes to improved access in all cases. It facilitates reconstruction because it allows accurate nerve selection and recognition of potential anomalies that might influence functional outcome.

Functional outcome after restorative panproctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis decreases an otherwise enhanced quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Restorative panproctocolectomy is a favoured operation for ulcerative colitis, but altered bowel habit may adversely affect overall quality of life. METHODS: Specific and generic quality of life questionnaires and an instrument to award money for continuing disability based on government guidelines were sent to 103 patients who had curative surgery for ulcerative colitis between 1995 and 1997. Seventy-one patients returned completed questionnaires: 30 with an ileostomy (representing incontinence and abnormal body image), 11 with a Koch pouch (representing continence and abnormal body image) and 30 with a pelvic pouch (representing continence and normal body image). RESULTS: Patients valued the disability of having an ileostomy similar to that for a Koch pouch or a pelvic pouch: pound 40 000, pound 30 000 and pound 40 000 respectively (P = 0. 97). There was no sex difference. Body image measured with a visual analogue scale (least = 1, worst = 10) was worst with the ileostomy and Koch pouch (8 each) and best with a pelvic pouch (5) (P = 0.06). However, pelvic pouches scored significantly worse than an ileostomy with regard to altered bowel emptying (pelvic pouch, 8; Koch pouch, 7; ileostomy, 5) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Poor function after pelvic pouch surgery offsets any advantage in body image over an ileostomy. Thus, overall quality of life and perceived monetary damage were the same for the two operations. Improved pelvic pouch function is likely to be reflected in better quality of life after restorative panproctocolectomy.

The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help?

In a retrospective study the quality of operation notes on specifically designed proformas was compared to those produced by word processors and predesigned templates and notes in patients undergoing operations for colorectal cancer. The operations in the two groups were similar. Computer notes scored higher on all criteria, were all legible and took the same time to generate. The results were given to staff in an attempt to improve the quality of future notes. Prospective comparison demonstrated that the quality of computer notes improved even further, while that of manual forms did not change. Word processor computer notes are easy to set up, amend and produce but staff should be trained in the use of personal computers and machines must be readily available in operating theatres. Word processor databases will, in addition, enable the data collected to be analysed automatically to yield information for audit and research.