COVID-19 seropositive donors yield comparable post-lung transplant outcomes.

Background: Recent reports have suggested that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection can cause pneumonitis even in the absence of clinical symptoms and COVID-19 associated pulmonary inflammation can persist resulting in long-term fibrosis. This single-center study utilized standardized immunological testing to determine whether lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, indicative of past COVID-19 infection, can be safely used for clinical transplantation. Methods: The study included 90 consecutive lung transplant procedures incorporating donor serological testing for past COVID-19 infection. Donors were negative for active COVID-19 infection and met institutional criteria to be used for lung transplantation. The outcomes of lung transplant recipients were compared between donors with and without serological evidence of past COVID-19 infection. Results: No significant difference was found in post-transplant survival rates between recipients of lungs obtained from donors with serological evidence compared to those without. Additionally, there were no significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 rates or other post-transplant clinical parameters, such as operative time, ischemic time, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that lungs from COVID-19 seropositive donors, but not active COVID-19 infection are safe and feasible for transplantation, yielding comparable post-transplant outcomes to donors who are negative COVID-19 antibodies. This study supports the utilization of lungs from donors with historic COVID-19 infection as long as they meet current transplant criteria, potentially addressing the concerns related to the use of such organs.

Outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients receiving organs from a donor with Fusarium solani species complex meningitis.

BACKGROUND: Five organs (heart, right lung, liver, right, and left kidneys) from a deceased patient were transplanted into five recipients in four US states; the deceased patient was identified as part of a healthcare-associated fungal meningitis outbreak among patients who underwent epidural anesthesia in Matamoros, Mexico. METHODS: After transplant surgeries occurred, Fusarium solani species complex, a fungal pathogen with a high case-mortality rate, was identified in cerebrospinal fluid from the organ donor by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and fungal-specific polymerase chain reaction and in plasma by mNGS. RESULTS: Four of five transplant recipients received recommended voriconazole prophylaxis; four were monitored weekly by serum (1-3)-ß-d-glucan testing. All five were monitored for signs of infection for at least 3 months following transplantation. The liver recipient had graft failure, which was attributed to an etiology unrelated to fungal infection. No fungal DNA was identified in sections of the explanted liver, suggesting that F. solani species complex did not contribute to graft failure. The remaining recipients experienced no signs or symptoms suggestive of fusariosis. CONCLUSION: Antifungal prophylaxis may be useful in preventing donor-derived infections in recipients of organs from donors that are found to have Fusarium meningitis.

Single-Center Experience With Lung Transplant Evaluation Referrals of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Do You Make Up For Lost Time?

Transfer of select, medically refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome patients to lung transplant centers requires extensive resources. Here, we report 270 consecutive lung transplant patient referrals to our center for medically refractory ARDS from June 2021 to April 2022, following the implementation of clinical care pathways for intake of these patients. Eighty-seven of 270 patients (32.2%) met screening criteria and were evaluated for transfer within a median of 12 days, during which 38 of 87 patients (43.7%) died and 12 of 87 patients (13.8%) transferred elsewhere. Thirty-seven of 87 patients (42.5%) were accepted for transfer of which 16 of 37 patients (43.2%) successfully transferred to our center with a median transfer waiting period of 12 days. Because of resource constraints, 21 of 37 accepted patients (56.8%) could not be transferred of which 9 of 21 patients (42.9%) died while waiting. Nine of 16 transferred patients (56.2%) eventually underwent lung transplantation with over 80% 6-month survival. ARDS patients referred for transplantation have high risk of mortality and, therefore, require well-described pathways for evaluation and transfer.