Consensus and Equipose in the Management of Military Trainee Femoral Neck Stress Fractures: A Survey of Military Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Femoral neck stress fractures (FNSFs) are a unique injury pattern not commonly treated in the civilian trauma population; however, it is particularly high with military trainees engaged in basic combat training. To date, no study has surveyed a population of military orthopedic surgeons on treatment preferences for military service members (SMs) with FNSF. QUESTIONS: We aim to evaluate the extent of clinical equipoise that exists in the management of these injuries, hypothesizing that there would be consensus in the factors dictating surgical and non-surgical intervention for FNSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 27-question survey was created and sent to U.S. military orthopedic surgeon members of the Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons. The survey was designed in order to gather the experience among surgeons in treating FNSF and identifying variables that play a role in the treatment algorithm for these patients. In addition, seven detailed, clinical vignettes were presented to further inquire on surgeon treatment preferences. Binomial distribution analysis was used to evaluate for common trends within the surgeon's treatment preferences. RESULTS: Seventy orthopedic surgeons completed the survey, the majority of whom were on active duty status in the U.S. Military (82.86%) and having under 5 years of experience (61.43%). Majority of surgeons elected for a multiple screw construct (92.86%), however the orientation of the multiple screws was dependent on whether the fracture was open or closed. Management for compression-sided FNSF involving ≥50% of the femoral neck width, tension-sided FNSF, and stress fractures demonstrating fracture line progression had consensus for operative management. Respondents agreed upon prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip if the following factors were involved: Complete fracture (98.57%), compression-sided fracture line >75% (88.57%), compression-sided fracture line >50-75% with hip effusion (88.57%), contralateral tension-sided fracture (87.14%), and compression-sided fracture line >50-75% (84.29%). An FNSF < 50% on the contralateral femoral neck or a hip effusion was indeterminate in surgeons indicating need for prophylactic fixation. Majority of surgeons (77.1%) utilized restricted toe-touch weight-bearing for postoperative mobility restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus exists for surgical and non-surgical management of FNSF by U.S. military orthopedic surgeons, despite the preponderance of surgeons reporting a low annual volume of FNSF cases treated. However, there are certain aspects in the operative and non-operative management of FNSF that are unanimously adhered to. Specifically, our results demonstrate that there is no clear indication on the management of FNSF when an associated hip effusion is involved. Additionally, the indications for surgically treating contralateral FNSF are unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Volar DRUJ Instability After Midshaft Both-Bone Forearm Fracture in a Toddler: A Case Report.

CASE: A 2.5-year-old male child presented to the clinic for evaluation of left wrist popping. Ten months earlier, he sustained a closed left both-bone forearm fracture (BBFF) treated with reduction and casting. His clinical course was complicated by redisplacement requiring secondary manipulation and casting before osseous union. His parents reported wrist popping with active motion in the setting of a 20° apex volar malunion of the midshaft radius. He has been treated with observation and monitoring of deformity remodeling. CONCLUSION: Distal radioulnar joint instability is a potential complication of malunited BBFF, even in a pediatric population. Residual deformity, especially in the radius, should prompt clinical follow-ups after osseous union to assess functional recovery and deformity remodeling.

Heterotopic ossification in complex orthopaedic combat wounds: quantification and characterization of osteogenic precursor cell activity in traumatized muscle.

BACKGROUND: Heterotopic ossification frequently develops following high-energy blast injuries sustained in modern warfare. We hypothesized that differences in the population of progenitor cells present in a wound would correlate with the subsequent formation of heterotopic ossification. METHODS: We obtained muscle biopsy specimens from military service members who had sustained high-energy wartime injuries and from patients undergoing harvest of a hamstring tendon autograft. Plastic-adherent cells were isolated in single-cell suspension and plated to assess the prevalence of colony-forming cells. Phenotypic characteristics were assessed with use of flow cytometry. Individual colony-forming units were counted after an incubation period of seven to ten days, and replicate cultures were incubated in lineage-specific induction media. Immunohistochemical staining was then performed to determine the percentage of colonies that had differentiated along an osteogenic lineage. Quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to identify changes in osteogenic gene expression. RESULTS: Injured patients had significantly higher numbers of muscle-derived connective-tissue progenitor cells per gram of tissue (p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 129,930 to 253,333), and those who developed heterotopic ossification had higher numbers of assayable osteogenic colonies (p < 0.016; 95% CI, 12,249 to 106,065). In the injured group, quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction performed on the in vitro expanded progeny of connective-tissue progenitors demonstrated upregulation of COL10A1, COL4A3, COMP, FGFR2, FLT1, IGF2, ITGAM, MMP9, PHEX, SCARB1, SOX9, and VEGFA in the patients with heterotopic ossification as compared with those without heterotopic ossification. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the number of connective-tissue progenitor cells is increased in traumatized tissue. Furthermore, wounds in which heterotopic ossification eventually forms have a higher percentage of connective-tissue progenitor cells committed to osteogenic differentiation than do wounds in which heterotopic ossification does not form. The early identification of heterotopic ossification-precursor cells and target genes in severe wounds not only may be an effective prognostic tool with which to assess whether heterotopic ossification will develop in a wound, but may also guide the future development of individualized prophylactic measures.

Outcomes associated with the internal fixation of long-bone fractures proximal to traumatic amputations.

BACKGROUND: Preservation of optimal residual limb length following a traumatic amputation can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to determine if acceptable results can be achieved by definitive fixation of a long-bone fracture proximal to a traumatic amputation. METHODS: We identified thirty-seven active-duty military service members who underwent internal fixation of a long-bone fracture proximal to a traumatic amputation. Functional status was assessed with the Tegner activity level scale and prosthesis use. Secondary outcome measures were the development of nonunion, infection, and heterotopic ossification. RESULTS: Twelve patients (32%) underwent amputation and fracture in the same osseous segment. Ten patients (27%) sustained bilateral traumatic amputations, and eight (22%) had a major fracture of the contralateral extremity. The median times to fracture fixation and amputation closure were twelve days and nineteen days, respectively, after the injury. The mean Tegner activity score was 3.32 (range, 1 to 6); patients with isolated extremity injuries had significantly higher Tegner scores than those with severe bilateral injuries (3.59 and 2.38, respectively; p = 0.04). Thirty-three patients (89%) developed an infection requiring surgical debridement. However, all fractures were treated until union occurred, and amputation level salvage was successful in all instances. Heterotopic ossification developed in twenty-eight patients (76%), with operative excision required in eleven patients (39%). CONCLUSIONS: High complication rates, but acceptable final results, can be achieved with internal fixation of a fracture proximal to a traumatic amputation to preserve functional joint levels or salvage residual limb length.

Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: comparative results at six months and one year from a randomized, prospective clinical trial.

The purpose of this report is to compare outcomes after arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision in the treatment of refractory acromioclavicular joint pain. A randomized, prospective clinical trial comparing the 6-month and 1-year outcomes of patients undergoing open distal clavicle excision (group 1) with those undergoing arthroscopic distal clavicle excision (group 2) was carried out. The Modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons form, visual analog scale pain score, Short Form 36, and satisfaction questions were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Seventeen patients were enrolled. There was a trend across all measures for earlier or better outcomes (or both) after arthroscopic over open treatment. The improvement in visual analog scale pain score from preoperatively to 1 year postoperatively was significant for group 2 but not group 1 (P = .006 vs P = .13). Occult intra-articular pathology was detected and treated in 50% of group 2 patients. Arthroscopic and open distal clavicle excisions both provide significant pain reduction at 1 year. Both are effective surgeries for the treatment of refractory acromioclavicular joint pain. The ability to diagnosis and treat subtle concomitant shoulder pathology is a unique advantage of the arthroscopic approach.