Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Pharm ; 637: 122888, 2023 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36977451

ABSTRACT

Microneedle-based technologies are the subject of intense research and commercial interest for applications in transdermal delivery and diagnostics, primarily because of their minimally invasive and painless nature, which in turn could lead to increased patient compliance and self-administration. In this paper, a process for the fabrication of arrays of hollow silicon microneedles is described. This method uses just two bulk silicon etches - a front-side wet etch to define the 500 µm tall octagonal needle structure itself, and a rear-side dry etch to create a 50 µm diameter bore through the needle. This reduces the number of etches and process complexity over the approaches described elsewhere. Ex-vivo human skin and a customised applicator were used to demonstrate biomechanical reliability and the feasibility of using these microneedles for both transdermal delivery and diagnostics. Microneedle arrays show no damage even when applied to skin up to 40 times, are capable of delivering several mL of fluid at flowrates of 30 µL/min, and of withdrawing 1 µL of interstitial fluid using capillary action.


Subject(s)
Equipment Design , Needles , Silicon , Humans , Administration, Cutaneous , Drug Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Microinjections/instrumentation , Microinjections/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Skin , Manufacturing Industry , Equipment Design/methods
3.
Nanotechnology ; 33(40)2022 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35764059

ABSTRACT

We report a simple, scalable two-step method for direct-write laser fabrication of 3D, porous graphene-like carbon electrodes from polyimide films with integrated contact plugs to underlying metal layers (Au or Ni). Irradiation at high average CO2laser power (30 W) and low scan speed (∼18 mm s)-1leads to formation of 'keyhole' contact plugs through local ablation of polyimide (initial thickness 17µm) and graphitization of the plug perimeter wall. Top-surface laser-induced graphene (LIG) electrodes are then formed and connected to the plug by raster patterning at lower laser power (3.7 W) and higher scan speed (200 mm s)-1. Sheet resistance data (71 ± 15 Ω sq.)-1indicates formation of high-quality surface LIG, consistent with Raman data which yield sharp first- and second-order peaks. We have also demonstrated that high-quality LIG requires a minimum initial polyimide thickness. Capacitance data measured between surface LIG electrodes and the buried metal film indicate a polyimide layer of thickness ∼7µm remaining following laser processing. By contrast, laser graphitization of polyimide of initial thickness ∼8µm yielded devices with large sheet resistance (>1 kΩ sq.)-1. Raman data also indicated significant disorder. Plug contact resistance values were calculated from analysis of transfer line measurement data for single- and multi-plug test structures. Contacts to buried nickel layers yielded lower plug resistances (1-plug: 158 ± 7 Ω , 4-plug: 31 ± 14 Ω) compared to contacts to buried gold (1-plug: 346 ± 37 Ω , 4-plug: 52 ± 3 Ω). Further reductions are expected for multi-plug structures with increased areal density. Proof-of-concept mm-scale LIG electrochemical devices with local contact plugs yielded rapid electron transfer kinetics (rate constantk0 âˆ¼ 0.017 cm s-1), comparable to values measured for exposed Au films (k0 âˆ¼0.023 cm s)-1. Our results highlight the potential for integration of LIG-based sensor electrodes with semiconductor or roll-to-roll manufacturing.

4.
Eur Spine J ; 31(4): 980-989, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35190896

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that bracing is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. According to the current classification, almost all braces fall in the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) category. Consequently, the generalization of scientific results is either impossible or misleading. This study aims to produce a classification of the brace types. METHODS: Four scientific societies (SOSORT, SRS, ISPO, and POSNA) invited all their members to be part of the study. Six level 1 experts developed the initial classifications. At a consensus meeting with 26 other experts and societies' officials, thematic analysis and general discussion allowed to define the classification (minimum 80% agreement). The classification was applied to the braces published in the literature and officially approved by the 4 scientific societies and by ESPRM. RESULTS: The classification is based on the following classificatory items: anatomy (CTLSO, TLSO, LSO), rigidity (very rigid, rigid, elastic), primary corrective plane (frontal, sagittal, transverse, frontal & sagittal, frontal & transverse, sagittal & transverse, three-dimensional), construction-valves (monocot, bivalve, multisegmented), construction-closure (dorsal, lateral, ventral), and primary action (bending, detorsion, elongation, movement, push-up, three points). The experts developed a definition for each item and were able to classify the 15 published braces into nine groups. CONCLUSION: The classification is based on the best current expertise (the lowest level of evidence). Experts recognize that this is the first edition and will change with future understanding and research. The broad application of this classification could have value for brace research, education, clinical practice, and growth in this field.


Subject(s)
Braces , Scoliosis , Consensus , Humans , Orthotic Devices , Scoliosis/therapy , Treatment Outcome
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29435499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) produced its first guidelines in 2005 and renewed them in 2011. Recently published high-quality clinical trials on the effect of conservative treatment approaches (braces and exercises) for idiopathic scoliosis prompted us to update the last guidelines' version. The objective was to align the guidelines with the new scientific evidence to assure faster knowledge transfer into clinical practice of conservative treatment for idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS). METHODS: Physicians, researchers and allied health practitioners working in the area of CTIS were involved in the development of the 2016 guidelines. Multiple literature reviews reviewing the evidence on CTIS (assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) and other CTIS) were conducted. Documents, recommendations and practical approach flow charts were developed using a Delphi procedure. The process was completed with the Consensus Session held during the first combined SOSORT/IRSSD Meeting held in Banff, Canada, in May 2016. RESULTS: The contents of the new 2016 guidelines include the following: background on idiopathic scoliosis, description of CTIS approaches for various populations with flow-charts for clinical practice, as well as literature reviews and recommendations on assessment, bracing, PSSE and other CTIS. The present guidelines include a total of 68 recommendations divided into following topics: bracing (n = 25), PSSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth (n = 12), PSSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy (n = 6), other conservative treatments (n = 2), respiratory function and exercises (n = 3), general sport activities (n = 6); and assessment (n = 14). According to the agreed strength and level of evidence rating scale, there were 2 recommendations on bracing and 1 recommendation on PSSE that reached level of recommendation "I" and level of evidence "II". Three recommendations reached strength of recommendation A based on the level of evidence I (2 for bracing and one for assessment); 39 recommendations reached strength of recommendation B (20 for bracing, 13 for PSSE, and 6 for assessment).The number of paper for each level of evidence for each treatment is shown in Table 8. CONCLUSION: The 2016 SOSORT guidelines were developed based on the current evidence on CTIS. Over the last 5 years, high-quality evidence has started to emerge, particularly in the areas of efficacy of bracing (one large multicentre trial) and PSSE (three single-centre randomized controlled trials). Several grade A recommendations were presented. Despite the growing high-quality evidence, the heterogeneity of the study protocols limits generalizability of the recommendations. There is a need for standardization of research methods of conservative treatment effectiveness, as recognized by SOSORT and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) non-operative management Committee.

6.
Scoliosis ; 4: 28, 2009 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20025783

ABSTRACT

From the time of its initial, informal meetings starting in 1980 to its formal creation in 1990, the IRSSD has met on a bi-annual basis to discuss all aspects of the spine and associated deformities. It has encouraged open discussion on all topics and, in particular, has tried to be the seed-bed for new ideas. The members are spread around the world and include people from all areas of academia as well as the most important people, the patients themselves. Most notably, application of the ideas and results of the research has always been at the forefront of the discussions. This paper was conceived with the idea of evaluating the impact made by the IRSSD over the last 30 years in the various areas and is intended to create discussion for the upcoming meeting in Montreal regarding future focus: "We are lost over the Atlantic Ocean but we are making good time."

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...