ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the cooking group from the burn survivors' perspective. By incorporating concepts of kitchen skills, energy conservation, and desensitization techniques, the cooking group can assist patients with the functional use of their hands, standing tolerance, return to former vocational activities, and socialization with other patients. A questionnaire was developed based on commonly expressed benefits of cooking group. Areas of interest included decreasing anxiety in the kitchen, distraction from their burns, socializing with other burn survivors, and the physical benefits of participating in the group. The results of this study indicate that participants regard the therapeutic cooking group as a valuable treatment modality that effectively combines functional activities with socialization to decrease burn related anxiety and increase motion in a supportive environment for patients with burns.
Subject(s)
Burns/psychology , Burns/rehabilitation , Cooking , Group Processes , Occupational Therapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/rehabilitation , Fear/psychology , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of a standard, custom-made pressure glove vs The NewYork-Presbyterian Dexterity Glove (NYPDG) with silon application on the palmer surface on functional hand use of burn survivors. A standard, custom-made pressure glove and NYPDG were given to 18 participants in a randomized order. Subjects wore each glove for 7 to 10 days during all activities of daily living (ADL). Variables such as hand function, difficulty of fine and gross motor ADL, and participant glove preference were assessed with each glove condition. Data collection of the second glove took place 7 to 10 days later incorporating a quasiexperimental, repeated measure design. A crossover design was used to analyze the data. The NYPDG demonstrated significantly better results in all of the four outcome categories measured: time to complete the Jebsen, the Jebsen Likert scale, fine motor ADL, and gross motor ADL. This study demonstrated that functional tasks took less time to complete and were more easily performed when using the NYPDG.
Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Burns/rehabilitation , Gloves, Protective , Hand Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Aged , Bandages , Cross-Over Studies , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , PressureABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to examine functional hand use in uninjured adults when wearing a standard, custom-made pressure glove (SPG) as compared with a glove with select placement of suede, The New York-Presbyterian Dexterity Glove (NYPDG) (patent pending). Thirty-four participants received a custom SPG and NYPDG in a randomized order. Gloves were worn for one day during all activities of daily living (ADL). Hand function, difficulty of fine and gross motor ADL, and participant glove preference were assessed. The process was repeated approximately 1 week later with the remaining glove incorporating a quasi-experimental, repeated measure design. Data were analyzed using a crossover design. Results were significant in favor of the NYPDG in all of the four outcome categories: time to complete the Jebsen, the Jebsen Likert scale, fine motor ADL, and gross motor ADL. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that functional tasks were faster and easier to perform when using the NYPDG.
