Positional aphasia as a manifestation of syndrome of the trephined: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: The authors report a case of a 66-year-old male who presented acutely with a subdural hematoma who was managed operatively with craniotomy. His course was complicated by a postoperative epidural hematoma, which, on the basis of intraoperative findings at the second surgery, was managed with evacuation of the hematoma and removal of the bone flap. OBSERVATIONS: The patient's subsequent recovery was remarkable for a reproducible positional aphasia in the early postoperative period with an ultimate diagnosis of syndrome of the trephined. The patient's cerebral edema permitted early autologous cranioplasty, which resulted in resolution of the patient's symptoms. LESSONS: The authors believe this case to be the first described of isolated positional aphasia as a manifestation of syndrome of the trephined. Recognition and treatment of the syndrome resulted in a positive patient outcome.

Tectal Hemorrhage in the Setting of COVID-19 Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerging evidence of a relationship to intracranial hemorrhage. The hemorrhages described to date often affect patients on anticoagulation, of advanced age, of nonwhite race, and requiring mechanical ventilation. Unusual or rare hemorrhage patterns have not as yet been described in the literature as being associated with COVID-19. CASE REPORT: A 36-year-old Hispanic male with no significant past medical history presented with isolated tectal intraparenchymal hemorrhage with intraventricular hemorrhage in the setting of no identifiable risk factors other than COVID-19. His management required temporizing with external ventricular drainage and subsequent endoscopic third ventriculostomy for ongoing obstruction of the cerebral aqueduct following the hemorrhage. He was discharged and did clinically well. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an intraparenchymal hematoma of the brain isolated to the midbrain tectum with only COVID-19 as a risk factor. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 may predispose patients to rare types of intraparenchymal hematomas which remain amenable to standard management algorithms.

Recrudescent infection after deep brain stimulator reimplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treating the symptoms of movement disorders can be life changing for patients. Thus, the 5%-15% incidence of stimulator-related infection requiring removal of the device can be particularly disheartening. Although DBS system reimplantation is generally successful, this is not always the case. The literature is replete with publications describing the incidence of infection and the associated features. However, the literature is sparse in terms of information on the incidence of recurrent or recrudescent infection after system reimplantation. The goal of this paper was to evaluate factors leading to unsuccessful reimplantation of a DBS system following initial infection. METHODS: Data were reviewed for all DBS procedures performed by one surgeon (K.L.H.) over 19 years including the infectious agent, location of infection, treatment regimen, and subsequent reimplantation of a DBS system and long-term outcome. RESULTS: In this series of 558 patients who had undergone DBS surgery, 37 (6.6%) subsequently developed an infection. Infections with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter species, or coagulase-negative staphylococci were predominant. Four patients had cerebritis, one had meningitis, and the rest had soft tissue infections of the pocket or scalp. All had their entire DBS system explanted, followed by 4-6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and surveillance for recrudescence for an additional period of at least 30 days. Twenty-five patients subsequently underwent DBS system reimplantation, and the procedure was successful in 22. Three of the 4 patients with cerebritis developed a subsequent wound infection after system reimplantation. None of the other 22 patients developed a recurrence. The odds ratio for developing a recurrent infection after cerebritis was 28.5 (95% CI 1.931-420.5, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest series of DBS system reimplantations following infection, demonstrated that most patients can have successful reimplantations without recurrent infection. However, patients who have had DBS-related cerebritis have a nearly 30-fold increased risk of developing reinfection after reimplantation. Alternative strategies for these patients are discussed.