Maternal exposure to polyethylene micro- and nanoplastics impairs umbilical blood flow but not fetal growth in pregnant mice.

While microplastics have been recently detected in human blood and the placenta, their impact on human health is not well understood. Using a mouse model of environmental exposure during pregnancy, our group has previously reported that exposure to polystyrene micro- and nanoplastics throughout gestation results in fetal growth restriction. While polystyrene is environmentally relevant, polyethylene is the most widely produced plastic and amongst the most commonly detected microplastic in drinking water and human blood. In this study, we investigated the effect of maternal exposure to polyethylene micro- and nanoplastics on fetal growth and placental function. Healthy, pregnant CD-1 dams were divided into three groups: 106 ng/L of 740-4990 nm polyethylene with surfactant in drinking water (n = 12), surfactant alone in drinking water (n = 12) or regular filtered drinking water (n = 11). At embryonic day 17.5, high-frequency ultrasound was used to investigate the placental and fetal hemodynamic responses following exposure. While maternal exposure to polyethylene did not impact fetal growth, there was a significant effect on placental function with a 43% increase in umbilical artery blood flow in the polyethylene group compared to controls (p < 0.01). These results suggest polyethylene has the potential to cause adverse pregnancy outcomes through abnormal placental function.

Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With Alcohol Abuse or Illicit Drug Use.

The impact of substance abuse, including alcohol abuse or illicit drug use, on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, has not been fully elucidated. Accordingly, to test the hypothesis that such a history would be associated with worse outcomes, we analyzed the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support registry. All patients from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support registry who received a continuous-flow LVAD from June 2006 to December 2017 were included. The median follow-up duration was 12.9 months (interquartile range, 5.3 to 17.5). The final study group consisted of 15,069 patients, of which 1,184 (7.9%) had a history of alcohol abuse and 1,139 (7.6%) had a history of illicit drug use. The overall mortality rates in the alcohol, illicit drug, and control groups were 25%, 21%, and 29%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that having a history of alcohol abuse (hazard ratio, 0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.13, p = 0.72) or illicit drug use (hazard ratio, 1.02, 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.21, p = 0.81) was not significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality when compared with general LVAD population. On the contrary, after adjusting for other covariates, a history of alcohol abuse or illicit drug use was significantly associated with increased device malfunction/pump thrombosis, device-related infection, or all-cause hospitalization (all p <0.05). Furthermore, After LVAD implantation, these patients had a lower quality of life assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire compared with those who did not. In conclusion, our findings suggest that patients with a history of alcohol abuse or illicit drug use are at risk for adverse device-related events with a lower quality of life after continuous-flow LVAD implantation compared with the general LVAD population.

A pilot study of target weight guided treatment in acute heart failure using ultrafiltration or usual care: effect on sodium removal.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the Ultrafiltration versus Intravenous Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure trial, ultrafiltration (UF) removed volume more effectively than usual care (UC). Hypothetically, UF may be superior to UC due to increased sodium (Na) removal and less neurohormonal activation. We compared UF and UC in a randomized pilot trial of target weight guided therapy for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with ADHF were enrolled and target weights established prospectively, prior to randomization to UC or UF. UF patients did not receive diuretics and UC patients were all treated with a continuous furosemide drip. All urine and ultrafiltrate were collected and Na concentrations measured. RESULTS: Similar volumes were removed in UC and UF groups (110105 mL and 107415 mL, respectively) and the UF group also produced 45325 mL of urine. Na concentration was 138±6 meq/L in the ultrafiltrate, 85±73 meq/L in the UC group's urine, and 26±23 meq/L in the UF group's urine. Given the relevant associated volumes, total meq of the Na removed was similar (1168 in UC vs. 1216 in UF). The UF group produced isotonic ultrafiltrate and a higher volume of dilute urine than anticipated. CONCLUSION: In a randomized pilot study of target weight guided therapy with UC or UF for ADHF, there were no differences in total volumes or Na removed, and lengths of hospital stays were similar. Isotonic fluid loss by UF was accompanied by the production of very dilute urine.

Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Initial studies established patient selection criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35%, QRS greater than or equal to 120 ms, and New York Heart Association 3-4. Based on newer data, post hoc analyses, and meta-analyses, these criteria have been refined and guidelines updated, highlighting left bundle branch morphology and QRS greater than 150 ms in selecting patients with a likelihood of favorable outcomes. Guidelines will change as more data become available; the decision to apply CRT should be based on patient clinical profile and the balance of risk tolerance and likelihood of benefit.

Ultrafiltration in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comparison with systolic heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: Ultrafiltration (UF) is a widely used technology for inpatient management of acute decompensated heart failure in patients with volume overload. However, the safety and efficacy of UF in patients with heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFPEF]) need further clarification. We hypothesized that UF could be used in this population with outcomes similar to acute decompensated heart failure patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (HFLEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective evaluation was performed on 2 patient cohorts admitted to a single institution for acute decompensated heart failure and treated with UF: HFLEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%; n=87) and HFPEF (left ventricular ejection fraction >40%; n=97). Selected demographic and clinical data were compared, including clinical and serological information, as well as in-hospital and 90-day postdischarge mortality. HFPEF patients were more likely to be women, have higher blood pressures, and less likely to have ischemic heart disease. There were no significant differences in total weight loss (7.7% in HFLEF and 7.0% in HFPEF), electrolyte and renal disturbances, or in-hospital mortality (3.4% in HFLEF and 3.3% in HFPEF) between the 2 groups. Mortality at 90 days tended to be greater in HFLEF (24.1%) than in HFPEF (15.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic responses in patients with HFPEF meeting current indication for UF are similar to those with HFLEF. Larger studies are warranted to better characterize acute heart failure management with UF in this population.

Out of control little-used clinical assets are draining healthcare budgets.

To improve utilization and reduce the cost of maintaining mobile clinical equipment, healthcare organization leaders should do the following: Select an initial asset group to target. Conduct a physical inventory. Evaluate the organization's asset "ecosystem." Optimize workflow processes. Phase in new processes, and phase out inventory. Devote time to change management. Develop a replacement strategy.

Algorithm-based assessment of target weight removal in acute decompensated heart failure.

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains a leading cause of hospitalization. The majority of these patients are admitted for volume overload, with fluid removal as the main therapeutic target. Practice guidelines do not appoint methods for determining the amount of volume that should be removed. The authors hypothesize that rigorous, protocol-driven establishment of a target weight to be removed would enhance actual volume removal and short-term outcomes. Forty-seven patients admitted with ADHF were enrolled. Each patient had target weight removal (TWR) determined by a heart failure (HF) specialist (serving as the gold standard). Separately, a nurse practitioner calculated the TWR from an algorithm using: (1) baseline weight, (2) renal function, and (3) degree of lower extremity edema. There was good correlation of TWR from an algorithmic approach compared with expert determination (r2 =0.8). A total of 87% of patients reached a discharge weight within 20% of the TWR. A more standardized approach to estimating target weight loss for hospitalized HF patients approximates those of HF specialists. Furthermore, this algorithm could be utilized by general practitioners in settings where an HF specialist is not readily available.