Florida's salt-marsh management issues: 1991-98.

During the 1990s, Florida has continued to make important strides in managing salt marshes for both mosquito control and natural resource enhancement. The political mechanism for this progress continues to be interagency cooperation through the Florida Coordinating Council on Mosquito Control and its Subcommittee on Managed Marshes (SOMM). Continuing management experience and research has helped refine the most environmentally acceptable source reduction methods, which typically are Rotational Impoundment Management or Open Marsh Water Management. The development of regional marsh management plans for salt marshes within the Indian River Lagoon by the SOMM has helped direct the implementation of the best management practices for these marshes. Controversy occasionally occurs concerning what management technique is most appropriate for individual marshes. The most common disagreement is over the benefits of maintaining an impoundment in an "open" vs. "closed" condition, with the "closed" condition, allowing for summer mosquito control flooding or winter waterfowl management. New federal initiatives influencing salt-marsh management have included the Indian River Lagoon-National Estuary Program and the Pesticide Environmental Stewardship Program. A new Florida initiative is the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Eco-system Management Program with continuing involvement by the Surface Water Improvement and Management program. A developing mitigation banking program has the potential to benefit marsh management but mosquito control interests may suffer if not handled properly. Larvicides remain as an important salt-marsh integrated pest management tool with the greatest acreage being treated with temephos, followed by Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis and methoprene. However, over the past 14 years, use of biorational larvicides has increased greatly.

Laboratory evaluation of biotic and abiotic factors that may influence larvicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis against two Florida mosquito species.

A technical powder of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis (B.t.i.) (VectoBac TP, 5,000 international toxic units [ITU]/mg), an aqueous suspension (VectoBac 12AS, 1,200 ITU/mg), and a granular formulation (VectoBac CG, 200 ITU/mg) were tested in the laboratory under different biotic and abiotic, conditions for efficacy against larvae of saltwater (Aedes taeniorhynchus) and freshwater (Culex nigripalpus) mosquitoes. Second-, 3rd-, and 4th-instar larvae of Cx. nigripalpus were 1.3-3-fold more susceptible to both VectoBac TP and VectoBac 12AS than were the respective larval instars of Ae. taeniorhynchus. For each species, 2nd-instar larvae were several-fold more susceptible to these B.t.i. preparations than were the 4th instars. In test cups, larvae under lower densities exposed to B.t.i. concentrations sustained 5-9-fold higher mortalities than larvae under high-density conditions. VectoBac TP and VectoBac 12AS stayed in suspension for up to 24 h with similar larvicidal efficacy, which was greater at 32-35 degrees C than at 15-20 degrees C. At 60 degrees C maintained for 24 h, VectoBac 12AS was adversely affected 2-3-fold in terms of potency, but VectoBac TP was not affected. Significant loss of potency of both VectoBac 12AS and VectoBac TP occurred when exposed to 35-37 degrees C under high light intensity (140,000-170,000 lux) for 6 h. Increasing salinity levels from 0 (fresh water) to 50% sea water caused gradual efficacy declines of VectoBac 12AS and VectoBac TP against Ae. taeniorhynchus larvae. VectoBac CG caused insignificant initial and residual (up to 8 days) larval mortalities of both mosquito species. This formulation did not release the active ingredient of B.t.i. in any significant mosquito larvicidal concentration in surface layers of water, and the formulation was more effective in shallower water. Storage of all 3 formulations under constant laboratory and variable field conditions for up to 8 months did not produce detectable potency loss of these products.

A review of current salt marsh management issues in Florida.

For the past decade, salt marsh management in Florida has been a central issue in attempts to reconcile mosquito control and natural resource interests. Progress has been made in trying to maintain effective mosquito control while protecting and enhancing salt marsh resources primarily due to: 1) efforts by the Florida Coordinating Council on Mosquito Control and its Subcommittee on Managed Marshes, which are committees comprised of agencies responsible for wetlands resources, those mandated to provide mosquito control, and research institutions; and 2) funding of research to investigate ecosystem effects of marsh management techniques. Research and management experience have demonstrated that Rotational Impoundment Management (RIM) and rotary ditching can provide ecologically sound source reduction benefits. Salt marsh ownership, management of state lands and mariculture remain controversial salt marsh management issues.

Mosquito production in a rotationally managed impoundment compared to other management techniques.

Mosquito production was monitored by larval dipping for 12 months in a 20.2 ha central east coast Florida salt marsh impoundment which was being managed under a rotational impoundment management (RIM) regime. This regime, implemented to provide mosquito control while retaining natural resource benefits, virtually eliminated salt-marsh Aedes mosquito production from late May through September when the marsh was closed to the estuary and flooded to approximately 1.0 ft NGVD. Anopheles spp. were collected only along the upland marsh edges in relatively low densities. Compared with the management methods of: 1) open to the estuary with culverts and, 2) passive retention of water with flapgate risers, RIM proved to be significantly more effective in reducing mosquito production.