Chronic venous disease, platelet and haemostatic abnormalities contribute to the pathogenesis of pigmented purpuric dermatoses.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the aetiology of pigmented purpuric dermatoses (PPD). METHODS: 63 patients with a provisional diagnosis of PPD were assessed. Skin biopsies were performed to confirm the clinical diagnosis. Haemostasis was assessed using platelet function analyser-100 (PFA-100), light transmission aggregometry (LTA), impedance aggregometry (Multiplate) and measurement of clotting times and clotting factors. Chronic venous disease (CVD) was assessed by duplex ultrasound. When not contraindicated, patients were advised to discontinue haemostatic-modifying drugs or supplements for 4 weeks after which the laboratory measurements were repeated and the clinical resolution of PPD was assessed. Subsequently, a cohort of patients identified with CVD underwent endovenous interventions and further resolution of PPD was assessed. RESULTS: CVD was found in 48 patients (76.2%) while haemostatic abnormalities were found in 36 (57.1%). 30 patients (47.6%) had concurrent CVD and haemostatic abnormalities. Modifiable risk factors such as the intake of platelet inhibitors or other drugs and supplements such as fish oil were identified in 53 patients (84.1%). These could be ceased in 35 patients of whom 28 (80.0%) achieved either complete or partial resolution of PPD. Treatment of the underlying CVD was performed in 18 patients resulting in complete or partial resolution in 17 (94.4%). In seven patients (11.1%), no CVD or haemostatic abnormalities were identified, and the risk factors included dietary factors such as excessive caffeine or soft drink consumption. CONCLUSION: Haemostatic abnormalities and CVD contribute to the pathogenesis of PPD. Resolution of PPD in the vast majority of patients may be achieved by cessation of modifiable risk factors and in particular platelet-modifying drugs or supplements and treatment of the underlying venous disease.

Management of chronic hand and foot eczema. An Australia/New Zealand Clinical narrative.

Chronic hand/foot eczemas are common, but treatment is often challenging, with widespread dissatisfaction over current available options. Detailed history is important, particularly with regard to potential exposure to irritants and allergens. Patch testing should be regarded as a standard investigation. Individual treatment outcomes and targets, including systemic therapy, should be discussed early with patients, restoring function being the primary goal, with clearing the skin a secondary outcome. Each new treatment, where appropriate, should be considered additive or overlapping to any previous therapy. Management extends beyond mere pharmacological or physical treatment, and requires an encompassing approach including removal or avoidance of causative factors, behavioural changes and social support. To date, there is little evidence to guide sequences or combinations of therapies. Moderately symptomatic patients (e.g. DLQI ≥ 10) should be started on a potent/super-potent topical corticosteroid applied once or twice per day for 4 weeks, with tapering to twice weekly application. If response is inadequate, consider phototherapy, and then a 12-week trial of a retinoid (alitretinoin or acitretin). Second line systemic treatments include methotrexate, ciclosporin and azathioprine. For patients presenting with severe symptomatic disease (DLQI ≥ 15), consider predniso(lo)ne 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/day (or ciclosporin 3 - 5 mg/kg/day) for 4-6 weeks with tapering, and then treating as for moderate disease as above. In non-responders, botulinum toxin and/or iontophoresis, if associated with hyperhidrosis, may sometimes help. Some patients only respond to long-term systemic corticosteroids. The data on sequencing of newer agents, such as dupilumab or JAK inhibitors, are immature.

Chemical peels: A review of current practice.

Chemical peels belong to a group of cutaneous resurfacing procedures that are used in the treatment of photoageing, inflammatory dermatoses, epidermal proliferations, pigmentary disorders and scarring. This review describes best current practice, highlights recent advances in chemical peel technology and discusses the recommended uses for different peel types. It also presents the results of a survey of the chemical peeling practices of 30 Australian dermatologists.

Effects of cholecalciferol on functional, biochemical, vascular, and quality of life outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Observational studies suggest that calciferol supplementation may improve laboratory and patient-level outcomes of hemodialysis patients with reduced 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels. This randomized controlled trial examined effects of cholecalciferol supplementation in patients on hemodialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Sixty patients with 25(OH)D levels ≤24 ng/ml (≤60 nmol/L) were randomized to receive 50,000 IU oral cholecalciferol or placebo, once weekly for 8 weeks and then monthly for 4 months. At baseline (autumn 2011) and 6 months, testing evaluated muscle strength, functional capacity, laboratory parameters, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 survey. RESULTS: Patients were well matched by treatment allocation. Median age was 62 years (range, 20-86), 52% were women, 55% had a history of diabetes, and mean serum 25(OH)D was 17±5 ng/ml (43±13 nmol/L). Patients were assessed over 6 months by repeated-measures ANOVA. Patients allocated to cholecalciferol had significantly higher values of 25(OH)D (P<0.001), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (P=0.04), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b) (P=0.04) and a greater reduction in phosphorus values (P=0.03) than placebo-treated patients Values of serum calcium, intact parathyroid hormone, and episodes of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant differences were detected in muscle strength, functional capacity, PWV, or HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, patients supplemented with cholecalciferol had higher 25(OH)D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b levels, without increased calcium or phosphorus values. However, no effects were detected in muscle strength, functional capacity, PWV, or HRQOL.