Improving Patient Understanding of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Three-Dimensional Models.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) printed models may help patients understand complex anatomic pathologies such as femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). We aimed to assess patient understanding and satisfaction when using 3D printed models compared with standard imaging modalities for discussion of FAIS diagnosis and surgical plan. METHODS: A consecutive series of 76 new patients with FAIS (37 patients in the 3D model cohort and 39 in the control cohort) from a single surgeon's clinic were educated using imaging and representative 3D printed models of FAI or imaging without models (control). Patients received a voluntary post-visit questionnaire that evaluated their understanding of the diagnosis, surgical plan, and visit satisfaction. RESULTS: Patients in the 3D model cohort reported a significantly higher mean understanding of FAIS (90.0 ± 11.5 versus 79.8 ± 14.9 out of 100; P = 0.001) and surgery (89.5 ± 11.6 versus 81.0 ± 14.5; P = 0.01) compared with the control cohort. Both groups reported high levels of satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSION: In this study, the use of 3D printed models in clinic visits with patients with FAIS improved patients' perceived understanding of diagnosis and surgical treatment.

Early Compensatory Segmental Angle Changes at L3-4 and L4-5 Following a L5-S1 Interbody Fusion for a Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study included patients who underwent a L5-S1 ALIF or TLIF with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for grade 1 spondylolisthesis 2018-2022. OBJECTIVE: To compare early reciprocal changes at the L3-4 and L4-5 adjacent levels six months after anterior (ALIF) or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1. BACKGROUND: Degenerative and chronic isthmic spondylolistheses often result in decreased segmental lordosis at L5-S1. This can lead to lordotic overcompensation at adjacent levels to maintain spinopelvic balance. However, the fate of adjacent angles following interbody fusion is not well understood. METHODS: Preoperative and 6-month postoperative measurements of segmental lordosis (L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence were obtained from sagittal standing radiographs. Preliminary t-tests were performed for descriptive purposes, and multiple regression was used for hypothesis testing. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (50 ALIF and 48 TLIF). A greater amount of lordosis achieved at L5-S1 was significantly associated with a greater reduction of segmental lordosis at L4-5 (r=-0.65, P<.001) or L3-4 (r=-0.46, P<.001) (Fig. 3A). A greater preoperative PI was associated with a greater reduction of segmental lordosis at L4-L5 (r=-0.42, P<.001) and at L3-L4 (r=-0.44, P<.001). CONCLUSION: At six months following a lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1, greater compensatory changes with lordosis reduction are observed at the supra-adjacent L4-5 and L3-4 levels in patients achieving greater L5-S1 segmental lordosis. Additionally, preoperative pelvic incidence (PI) played a role in influencing lordotic correction.

The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Interbody fusion, including: transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF); effectively treat lumbar degenerative pathology and provide spinopelvic balance. Although the decision on surgical approach and technique are multifactorial and patient specific, the impact of the interbody approach on segmental and adjacent level lordosis could be an important factor to consider during pre-operative planning to achieve pre-specified alignment goals. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to compare the 6-month postoperative radiographic outcomes in the lumbar spine following 1 to 2 level transforaminal (TLIF), posterior (PLIF), anterior (ALIF), and lateral (LLIF) interbody fusions at the L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels. As our primary outcome, we evaluated the change in segmental lordosis at the level of fusion in ALIF/LLIF approaches compared to TLIF/PLIF. Secondarily, we evaluated the pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and examined the compensatory lordotic changes at the adjacent levels 6 months following surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: This retrospective study included 18 centers of various practice settings across the United States. Patients were included in the study if they underwent a one- or two-level primary lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Measurements of the pre-operative and 6-month post-operative lumbar AP and lateral lumbar plain radiographs included: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis from L1-S1 (LL), as well as segmental lordosis (SL) of each segment between L1-S1. METHODS: Due to there being 2 evaluated time points, patients were then grouped based on alignment into categories of preserved, restored, not corrected, and worsened. RESULTS: 474 patients underwent 608 levels of fusion. ALIF/LLIF resulted in significantly more segmental lordosis compared to TLIF/PLIF procedures at both L4-5 and L5-S1 (p<.001). Overall, ALIF/LLIF resulted in significantly more global lumbar lordotic alignment change compared to TLIF/PLIF (p=.01). Whether patients' alignment was preserved versus worsened was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Similarly, whether patients' alignment was restored versus not corrected was not significantly predicted by type of procedure. Finally, anterior approaches resulted in decreased lordosis at adjacent levels, thus resulting in a more neutral position. CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter retrospective study of 1 to 2 level interbody fusion surgeries, we identified that A/LLIF procedures at L4-L5 and L5-S1 resulted in greater segmental lordosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch improvement compared to T/PLIF procedures. A/LLIF may also significantly reduce lordosis (compared to T/PLIF) at the adjacent levels in a fashion that serves to reduce the lumbar lordosis that may have been increased at the fused level.