Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Cogn Behav Neurol ; 34(2): 117-128, 2021 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34074866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the personality profiles of adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using a standard personality assessment and to investigate the association between personality, ASD-related face memory deficit (FMD), and theory of mind (ToM). In a broader context, to examine whether there are distinct clinical phenotypes in the ASD population that have implications for personality development and treatment. METHOD: Fifty-five adults with ASD and 22 neurotypical (NT) adults underwent a battery of neuropsychological tests, including measures of personality, face memory, and ToM. We compared ASD and NT groups in terms of their Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) profiles. Additional analyses focused on the association between specific PAI scales and FMD. Performance on the Eyes Test was compared across groups and was examined in relation to FMD. RESULTS: Adults with ASD demonstrated significant elevations on several PAI scales compared with NT adults. The presence of FMD was associated with differing PAI profiles among the ASD adults. The ASD adults with FMD scored significantly higher on scales that are sensitive to positive impression management and treatment rejection and significantly lower on scales that are sensitive to borderline personality, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and stress. There was a significant association between performance on the Eyes Test and FMD in the ASD group. CONCLUSION: Adults with ASD have a unique personality profile. Further, ASD adults with FMD have reduced insight into their difficulties with emotional processing and may not be as sensitive as ASD adults without FMD to the emotions of others.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , Personality , Theory of Mind , Adult , Autism Spectrum Disorder/complications , Autism Spectrum Disorder/psychology , Bayes Theorem , Female , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders , Middle Aged , Young Adult
2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 67(4): 790-793, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30737774

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between performance on subtests of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and driving competence in people with cognitive impairment (CI) as well as those with no cognitive impairment (NCI). DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Participants referred for a DriveWise evaluation at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, were included in the study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 419 participants referred for a DriveWise evaluation was studied. The average age of the sample was 77.69 years. In this study, people with an MMSE score lower than 25 were included in the CI group; 41% of participants had CI. MEASUREMENTS: All participants underwent mental status screening with the MMSE, and all underwent a 45-minute road test modeled after the Washington University Road Test adapted for use in Boston streets. RESULTS: In both groups, poor road test performance was associated with low scores on the MMSE. In drivers with CI, MMSE total score and performance on the attention subtest were significantly lower for those who failed the road test. In drivers with NCI, the MMSE total score and orientation subtests were significantly lower for those who failed the road test. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians working with older people should know that the MMSE is an effective tool to screen for driving safety, but MMSE subtests are differentially sensitive to driving safety in people with and without CI. Poor performance on specific MMSE subtests may prompt further evaluation of driving competence with a road test. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:790-793, 2019.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction/diagnosis , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
3.
Accid Anal Prev ; 113: 125-130, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29407659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Many studies have demonstrated that speed to complete items on the Trail Making Tests (TMT A and TMT B) is useful in the prediction of driving safety. However, there is no consensus regarding optimal "cut scores" to discriminate between safe and unsafe drivers. In this study, we examine TMT speed and errors in drivers referred for a road test. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Patients referred for a DriveWise® evaluation at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Drivers age 65 or older were included (total n = 373). Forty-five percent of the sample had been diagnosed with Cognitive Impairment (CI) whereas the remaining participants were in the No Cognitive Impairment (NCI) group. MEASUREMENTS: TMT Parts A & B, Folstein Mini Mental Status Examination, Washington University Road Test. RESULTS: CI drivers with TMT A speed exceeding 46 s were more likely to fail the road test whereas TMT B speed was not a sensitive metric in this group. In the No Cognitive Impairment (NCI) group, TMT B speed exceeding 131 s predicted driving impairment whereas TMT A speed was not sensitive. Error scores were not useful in the determination of driving fitness for either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides useful criteria for health providers working with older people in the determination of driving fitness. Results suggest that TMT speed, but not error rate, is associated with road test performance. Based on our work, we advocate that pre-existing dementia should be taken into consideration when using TMT performance as a screen for driving.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving/psychology , Cognitive Dysfunction , Dementia/psychology , Trail Making Test , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Boston , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 63(5): 988-92, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25940275

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of two cognitive screening measures, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), in predicting driving test outcome for individuals with and without cognitive impairment. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A clinical driving evaluation program at a teaching hospital in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adult drivers who underwent assessment with the MMSE and MoCA as part of a comprehensive driving evaluation between 2010 and 2014 (N=92). MEASUREMENTS: MMSE and MoCA total scores were independent variables. The outcome measure was performance on a standardized road test. RESULTS: A preestablished diagnosis of cognitive impairment enhanced the validity of cognitive screening measures in the identification of at-risk drivers. In individuals with cognitive impairment there was a significant relationship between MoCA score and on-road outcome. Specifically, an individual was 1.36 times as likely to fail the road test with each 1-point decrease in MoCA score. No such relationship was detected in those without a diagnosis of cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: For individuals who have not been diagnosed with cognitive impairment, neither the MMSE nor the MoCA can be reliably used as an indicator of driving risk, but for individuals with a preestablished diagnosis of cognitive impairment, the MoCA is a useful tool in this regard. A score on the MoCA of 18 or less should raise concerns about driving safety.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
5.
Traffic Inj Prev ; 14(8): 782-90, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24073765

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance on a standardized driving evaluation of a group of oldest old adults (age 90-97) against younger old adults (age 80-87) and examine whether the same cognitive variables and brake reaction time performance were associated with pass-fail status on a road test in both groups. Secondary objectives focused on an examination of the specific driving errors of both groups. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the setting of a clinical driving evaluation program at an academic medical center in the United States. In this study we examined the performance of 88 participants (27 age 90-97 and 61 age 80-87) who completed comprehensive driving evaluations between 1997 and 2011. The outcome variable was performance on a standardized road test. Measures included the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and brake reaction time (BRT). An exploratory analysis of the possible predictive value of specific MMSE subtests was also performed. RESULTS: Results indicate that the oldest old adults (90-97 years old) were at no greater driving risk than were a younger old (80-87 years old) cohort and made similar types and frequency of driving errors. TMT-B time was associated with pass-fail status in both groups. MMSE attention items discriminated between safe and unsafe younger old drivers, and MMSE orientation items were associated with pass-fail status in the oldest old cohort. CONCLUSION: Drivers age 90 and above were at no greater driving risk than those one decade younger. MMSE orientation questions may be useful to assist in identifying which oldest old drivers could benefit from a comprehensive driving evaluation including an on-road test.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving/psychology , Cognition/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Academic Medical Centers , Age Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Automobile Driver Examination , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , United States
6.
Accid Anal Prev ; 59: 537-47, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23954688

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a pilot study to evaluate the predictive value of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) and a brief test of multiple object tracking (MOT) relative to other tests of cognition and attention in identifying at-risk older drivers, and to determine which combination of tests provided the best overall prediction. METHODS: Forty-seven currently licensed drivers (58-95 years), primarily from a clinical driving evaluation program, participated. Their performance was measured on: (1) a screening test battery, comprising MoCA, MOT, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail-Making Test, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and Useful Field of View (UFOV) and (2) a standardized road test. RESULTS: Eighteen participants were rated at-risk on the road test. UFOV subtest 2 was the best single predictor with an area under the curve (AUC) of .84. Neither MoCA nor MOT was a better predictor of the at-risk outcome than either MMSE or UFOV, respectively. The best four-test combination (MMSE, UFOV subtest 2, visual acuity and contrast sensitivity) was able to identify at-risk drivers with 95% specificity and 80% sensitivity (.91 AUC). CONCLUSIONS: Although the best four-test combination was much better than a single test in identifying at-risk drivers, there is still much work to do in this field to establish test batteries that have both high sensitivity and specificity.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Attention , Automobile Driver Examination , Automobile Driving/statistics & numerical data , Cognition , Decision Support Techniques , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contrast Sensitivity , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Status Schedule , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Pilot Projects , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Assessment/methods , Trail Making Test , Visual Acuity , Visual Field Tests
7.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 60(6): 1044-50, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22690980

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To use an expert consensus process to identify indicators of delirium features to help enhance bedside recognition of delirium. DESIGN: Modified Delphi consensus process to assign existing cognitive and delirium assessment items to delirium features in the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) diagnostic algorithm. SETTING: Meetings of expert panel. PARTICIPANTS: Panel of seven interdisciplinary clinical experts. MEASUREMENTS: Panelists' assignments of each assessment item to indicate CAM features. RESULTS: From an initial pool of 119 assessment items, the panel assigned 66 items to at least one CAM feature, and many items were assigned to more than one feature. Experts achieved a high level of consensus, with a postmeeting kappa for agreement of 0.98. The study staff compiled the assignment results to create a comprehensive list of CAM feature indicators, consisting of 107 patient interview questions, cognitive tasks, and interviewer observations, with some items assigned to multiple features. A subpanel shortened this list to 28 indicators of important delirium features. CONCLUSION: A systematic, well-described qualitative methodology was used to create a list of indicators for delirium based on the features of the CAM diagnostic algorithm. This indicator list may be useful as a clinical tool for enhancing delirium recognition at the bedside and for aiding in the development of a brief delirium screening instrument.


Subject(s)
Delirium/diagnosis , Delphi Technique , Algorithms , Consensus , Diagnosis, Differential , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Observation , Psychological Tests
9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 58(6): 1104-8, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20487078

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of crash history, family concerns, clinical condition, and cognitive function (the 4Cs, an interview-based screening tool for health providers working with older drivers) in identifying at-risk older drivers. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Clinical driving evaluation program at a teaching hospital in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty patients who completed comprehensive driving evaluations between 2003 and 2009. MEASUREMENTS: Medical record information was used to identify component and total 4Cs scores. Other measurements included the Trail Making Test, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and brake reaction time. The outcome variable was performance on a 45-minute road test. RESULTS: Fifty participants passed the road test, 67 failed, and 43 demonstrated marginal driving skills. The relationship between 4Cs scores and road test outcome was statistically significant (P<.001). The domains most strongly associated with road test outcome were cognitive function (P<.001) and family concerns (P=.01). Scores of 9 or greater-on the 4Cs identified 84% of participants who were at risk for poor road test performance. CONCLUSION: The 4Cs, an interview based screening tool, may be a useful marker to identify at-risk older drivers.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Aging/psychology , Automobile Driver Examination/statistics & numerical data , Automobile Driving/psychology , Cognition , Family/psychology , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Health Status , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
10.
Epilepsy Behav ; 16(1): 113-9, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19643674

ABSTRACT

Although anterograde memory deficits are well documented in patients with epilepsy, the extent to which remote memory deficits occur is less clear. This is due in part to a lack of reliable methods for assessment. The present study examined the feasibility of using the Transient News Events Test (TNET) to assess remote memory in subjects status post anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for the treatment of refractory seizures. Results indicated significantly poorer performance of the patient group compared to healthy controls. The decrement in performance within the patient group was evident only for items from more recent time periods. Reasons for an apparent stability of the most remote memories with ATL and implications regarding hippocampal function are reviewed. In conclusion, the TNET provides a feasible method for assessment of remote memory function in patients with epilepsy, with decrements in performance noted in comparison to a healthy control group in this retrospective study.


Subject(s)
Kluver-Bucy Syndrome/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Adult , Age Factors , Analysis of Variance , Education , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/diagnosis , Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe/psychology , Female , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Kluver-Bucy Syndrome/epidemiology , Kluver-Bucy Syndrome/psychology , Linear Models , Male , Memory Disorders/psychology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Recognition, Psychology/physiology , Sex Factors
11.
Epilepsy Behav ; 15(4): 456-60, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19541546

ABSTRACT

Periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH) is a brain malformation clinically characterized by the triad of epilepsy, normal intelligence, and dyslexia. We investigated the structure-function relationship between cerebral volumes and cognitive ability in this disorder by studying 12 subjects with PNH and 6 controls using volumetric analysis of high-resolution anatomical MRI and neuropsychological testing. Total cerebral volumes and specific brain compartment volumes (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) in subjects with PNH were comparable to those in controls. There was a negative correlation between heterotopic gray matter volume and cortical gray matter volume. Cerebral and cortical volumes in PNH did not correlate with Full Scale IQ, unlike in normal individuals. Our findings support the idea that heterotopic nodules contain misplaced neurons that would normally have migrated to the cortex, and suggest that structural correlates of normal cognitive ability may be different in the setting of neuronal migration failure.


Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Cognition/physiology , Epilepsy/pathology , Epilepsy/psychology , Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia/pathology , Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia/psychology , Adult , Cerebral Cortex/pathology , Epilepsy/etiology , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Periventricular Nodular Heterotopia/complications , Positron-Emission Tomography , Reproducibility of Results , Wechsler Scales , Young Adult
12.
Gerontol Geriatr Educ ; 29(4): 351-62, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19064471

ABSTRACT

Health care professionals working with the elderly have opportunities through research and clinical practice to shape public policy affecting the older driver. This article describes DriveWise, an interdisciplinary hospital-based driving assessment program developed in response to clinical concerns about the driving safety of individuals with medical conditions. DriveWise clinicians use evidence-based, functional assessments to determine driving competence. In addition, the program was designed to meet the emotional needs of individuals whose driving safety has been called into question. To date, approximately 380 participants have been assessed through DriveWise. The following report details the DriveWise mission, DriveWise team members, and road test results. We continue to refine the assessment process to promote safety and support the dignity and independence of all participants. The DriveWise interdisciplinary approach to practice is a concrete example of how gerontological education across professions can have direct benefits to the older adult.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Automobile Driving , Dementia , Geriatric Assessment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Automobile Driver Examination , Humans , Risk Assessment , United States
13.
CNS Spectr ; 13(1): 56-64, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18204415

ABSTRACT

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a clinical diagnosis in which deficits in cognitive function are evident but not of sufficient severity to warrant a diagnosis of dementia. For the majority of patients, MCI represents a transitional state between normal aging and mild dementia, usually Alzheimer's disease. Multiple subtypes of MCI are now recognized. In addition to presentations featuring memory impairment, symptoms in other cognitive domains (eg, executive function, language, visuospatial) have been identified. Neuropsychological testing can be extremely useful in making the MCI diagnosis and tracking the evolution of cognitive symptoms over time. A comprehensive test battery includes measures of baseline intellectual ability, attention, executive function, memory, language, visuospatial skills, and mood. Informant-based measures of neuropsychiatric symptoms, behaviors, and competency in instrumental activity are also included. Careful assessment can identify subtle deficits that may otherwise elude detection, particularly in individuals of superior baseline intellectual ability. As we move closer to disease-modifying therapy for Alzheimer's disease, early identification becomes critical for identifying patients who have an opportunity to benefit from treatment.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Amnesia/diagnosis , Amnesia/psychology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Diagnosis, Differential , Disease Progression , Early Diagnosis , Humans
14.
Brain Cogn ; 66(1): 65-72, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17606318

ABSTRACT

Two studies explored the stability of art preference in patients with Alzheimer's disease and age-matched control participants. Preferences for three different styles of paintings, displayed on art postcards, were examined over two sessions. Preference for specific paintings differed among individuals but AD and non-AD groups maintained about the same stability in terms of preference judgments across two weeks, even though the AD patients did not have explicit memory for the paintings. We conclude that aesthetic responses can be preserved in the face of cognitive decline. This should encourage caregivers and family to engage in arts appreciation activities with patients, and reinforces the validity of a preference response as a dependent measure in testing paradigms.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Art , Esthetics , Self Concept , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Reference Values , Time Factors
15.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol ; 22(5): 631-5, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17481851

ABSTRACT

Studies have shown that the Trail Making Test (TMT) predicts real-world driving performance in individuals who have cognitive deficits. However, because this test requires knowledge of the Latin alphabet, the TMT may not be appropriate for individuals who are illiterate or for those whom English is not their primary language. Because the Color Trails Test (CTT) is not influenced by knowledge of the alphabet, the CTT may be a culture-fair alternative to the TMT. To date, the utility of the CTT in the evaluation of driver competence has not been established. In the current study, individuals referred for a comprehensive driving assessment underwent testing with the TMT and CTT. The results suggest that the CTT and the TMT provide similar information regarding road-test outcome. Thus, the CTT may be a culture-fair alternative to the TMT in the assessment of driver competence.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driver Examination/statistics & numerical data , Cultural Diversity , Multilingualism , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Trail Making Test/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/psychology , Brain Damage, Chronic/diagnosis , Brain Damage, Chronic/psychology , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Brain Injuries/psychology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/diagnosis , Cerebrovascular Disorders/psychology , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Parkinson Disease/diagnosis , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Psychometrics , Reaction Time , Reference Values , Syncope/psychology
16.
Cogn Behav Neurol ; 18(4): 223-7, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16340396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of depression and treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on sequence learning. BACKGROUND: Prefrontal dysfunction in depression may affect sequence learning and be amenable to normalization by rTMS. METHOD: The serial reaction time test (SRTT) was administered to 19 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 20 nondepressed control participants. MDD patients were examined before and following treatment with rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in daily sessions of 1600 stimuli at 10 Hz and at an intensity of 110% of the motor threshold. Treatment occurred over a 2-week interval of time. RESULTS: MDD and nondepressed groups differed significantly with respect to baseline response speed. Following treatment with rTMS, MDD participants demonstrated significantly improved mood, improved response speed, and improved procedural learning. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that rTMS over a 2-week period improves performance on tasks of response speed and procedural memory in patients with MDD. These cognitive effects are greater in those patients who showed a significant antidepressant effect to rTMS intervention.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Memory/physiology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Mood Disorders/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adult , Cognition/physiology , Female , Humans , Learning/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Motor Skills/physiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Reading
17.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 10(2): 221-9, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15012842

ABSTRACT

The retrograde amnesia of patients with memory loss related to rupture and surgical repair of anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms is compared with the retrograde amnesia of temporal amnesic patients and nonamnesic control participants. Two tests which focus on popular culture but which differ according to extent of news exposure and the cognitive processes necessary for task performance were used to measure retrograde memory. ACoA patients demonstrated more significant retrograde memory problems than did nonamnesic controls; however, the severity and pattern of their memory loss was less severe than that seen in association with temporal amnesia. Different factors influenced the remote memory loss of respective groups: ACoA patients' problems were related to impaired lexical retrieval whereas temporal amnesic patients had problems secondary to both retrieval and storage deficits.


Subject(s)
Amnesia, Retrograde/diagnosis , Amnesia, Retrograde/etiology , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery , Aneurysm, Ruptured/complications , Female , Humans , Intracranial Aneurysm/complications , Male , Mental Recall , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Severity of Illness Index
18.
Neurol Clin ; 21(2): 387-416, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12916485

ABSTRACT

This article introduces the reader to a sample of visual tests used in the neuropsychologic assessment of patients who present with various visual deficits. As discussed, patients often present with visual abnormalities that cannot be assessed exclusively during the opthtalmologic examination, partly because these problems extend beyond the fundamental aspects of visual processing. Visual problems occur in the context of focal or diffuse brain damage. Neuropsychologic evaluation can provide valuable diagnostic information and information regarding functional strengths and weaknesses. Many visual tests have been developed for clinical use. Some of these tests have been validated with lesion analytic or neuroimaging studies, which highlight the areas of the brain presumed necessary for task performance. Knowledge regarding the neural substrates of test performance allows the clinician to identify the neuropathologic correlates of test failure, which, in turn, is relevant to differential diagnosis. A profile of functional strengths and weaknesses emerges contributing to the treatment of the patient with a visual disorder. In this article, the authors present a subset of visual tests used primarily in the clinical setting. Some of these tests measure lower-level visual deficits (e.g., Judgment of Line Orientation) and others measure higher-level visual/cognitive deficits (e.g., ROCF). Although no firm delineation of test subtypes exists, the authors divide the tests into general categories of visuoperceptual, visuospatial, visuoconstructive, and visual attention/memory. Ultimately, it is incumbent on a trained neuropsychologist to select appropriate visual tests based on the patient's described symptoms and the referral question.


Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/complications , Brain Diseases/physiopathology , Neuropsychological Tests , Perceptual Disorders/diagnosis , Perceptual Disorders/etiology , Adult , Aged , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cerebral Hemorrhage/complications , Cerebral Hemorrhage/pathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Discrimination, Psychological , Facial Expression , Female , Glioblastoma/complications , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Parietal Lobe/pathology , Recognition, Psychology , Space Perception , Visual Perception/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...