ABSTRACT
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic triggered unprecedented disruption to NHS dental services in England. This work describes changes in realised access to NHS primary care dental services between 2019 and 2022, with a particular focus on geographic and deprivation-based inequalities.Methods Data from the NHS Business Services Authority and Office for National Statistics were combined to calculate the proportion of resident populations utilising NHS primary care dental services. These data were compared over multiple six-monthly time periods between 2019 and 2022, across several levels of geography and by quintiles of area-level deprivation.Results The proportion of the England population utilising services fell substantially after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, recovering to 75-80% of pre-pandemic levels in the first half of 2022. Substantial geographic variation was observed in the pre-pandemic time points and re-emerged as the recovery period progressed. Deprivation-based inequalities in service use were persistently present, although these were consistently greater in child than adult populations. While inequalities for children increased in the initial post-pandemic period, this pattern returned almost to pre-pandemic levels by 2022.Conclusions Socioeconomic inequalities and geographic variations in the use of NHS primary care dental services, seen before the COVID-19 pandemic, have re-emerged afterwards.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While inequalities in oral health are documented, little is known about the extent to which they are attributable to potentially modifiable factors. We examined the role of behavioural and dental attendance pathways in explaining oral health inequalities among adults in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. METHODS: Using nationally representative data, we analysed inequalities in self-rated oral health and number of natural teeth. Highest educational attainment, equivalised household income and occupational social class were used to derive a latent socioeconomic position (SEP) variable. Pathways were dental attendance and behaviours (smoking and oral hygiene). We used structural equation modelling to test the hypothesis that SEP influences oral health directly and also indirectly via dental attendance and behavioural pathways. RESULTS: Lower SEP was directly associated with fewer natural teeth and worse self-rated oral health (standardised path coefficients, -0.21 (SE=0.01) and -0.10 (SE=0.01), respectively). We also found significant indirect effects via behavioural factors for both outcomes and via dental attendance primarily for self-rated oral health. While the standardised parameters of total effects were similar between the two outcomes, for number of teeth, the estimated effect of SEP was mostly direct while for self-rated oral health, it was almost equally split between direct and indirect effects. CONCLUSION: Reducing inequalities in dental attendance and health behaviours is necessary but not sufficient to tackle socioeconomic inequalities in oral health.
Subject(s)
Health Status Disparities , Oral Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , England/epidemiology , Social Class , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oral diseases are highly prevalent and impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). However, time changes in OHRQoL have been scarcely investigated in the current context of general improvement in clinical oral health. This study aims to examine changes in OHRQoL between 1998 and 2009 among adults in England, and to analyse the contribution of demographics, socioeconomic characteristics and clinical oral health measures. METHODS: Using data from two nationally representative surveys in England, we assessed changes in the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14), in both the sample overall (n=12 027) and by quasi-cohorts. We calculated the prevalence and extent of oral impacts and summary OHIP-14 scores. An Oaxaca-Blinder type decomposition analysis was used to assess the contribution of demographics (age, gender, marital status), socioeconomic position (education, occupation) and clinical measures (presence of decay, number of missing teeth, having advanced periodontitis). RESULTS: There were significant improvements in OHRQoL, predominantly among those that experienced oral impacts occasionally, but no difference in the proportion with frequent oral impacts. The decomposition model showed that 43% (-4.07/-9.47) of the decrease in prevalence of oral impacts reported occasionally or more often was accounted by the model explanatory variables. Improvements in clinical oral health and the effect of ageing itself accounted for most of the explained change in OHRQoL, but the effect of these factors varied substantially across the lifecourse and quasi-cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: These decomposition findings indicate that broader determinants could be primarily targeted to influence OHRQoL in different age groups or across different adult cohorts.