ABSTRACT
A semiphysiologically based pharmacokinetic (semi-PBPK) population model was used to evaluate the influence of enterohepatic recycling and protein binding, as well as the effect of genetic variability in CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and ABCG2, on the large interindividual variability of teriflunomide (active metabolite) concentrations following leflunomide administration in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The model was developed with total and free teriflunomide concentrations determined in RA patients taking leflunomide, as well as mean teriflunomide concentrations following the administration of leflunomide or teriflunomide extracted from the literature. Once developed, the 15-compartment model was able to predict total and free teriflunomide concentrations and was used to screen demographic and genotypic covariates, of which only fat-free mass and liver function (ALT) improved prediction. This approach effectively evaluated the effects of multiple covariates on both total and free teriflunomide concentrations, which have only been explored previously through simplistic one-compartment models for total teriflunomide.
ABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: A common polymorphism (C1858T) in the gene that encodes the protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22) is associated with altered T-cell responses and increased susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune diseases. Teriflunomide, the active metabolite of leflunomide, reduces T-cell responses through inhibition of tyrosine kinase p56LCK. We examined a potential association between PTPN22 genotype and response or toxicity to leflunomide in Caucasian RA patients taking leflunomide in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the Royal Adelaide Hospital RA inception cohort and taking leflunomide were eligible for inclusion. Participants were followed for 12 months after leflunomide initiation or until either another DMARD was added or leflunomide was ceased. Clinical response according to change in 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and cessation due to toxicity were assessed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 94 participants were included in the study, 75 of whom carried the CC genotype, 18 the CT, whereas one individual carried the TT genotype. Over the first 12 months of leflunomide treatment, there was no statistically significant relationship between carrying the T allele and change in DAS28 (-0·84 vs. -1·15, P = 0·446) nor with cessation of leflunomide treatment due to side effects (P = 0·433). These results indicate that PTPN22 C1858T genotype has no effect on response or toxicity outcomes in leflunomide-treated RA patients. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the biologically plausible hypothesis that PTPN22 genotype might be a predictor of response/toxicity to leflunomide therapy. Despite this, PTPN22 genotype was not associated with leflunomide response or toxicity in patients with RA.
