Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 6(1): 42-6, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8142098

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in obstetric patients when using the 24-gauge or the larger 22-gauge Sprotte needle. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Four hospitals. PATIENTS: 375 ASA physical status I and II cesarean section and postpartum tubal ligation patients. INTERVENTIONS: Obstetric patients were randomly assigned to receive spinal anesthesia via a midline dural puncture using the 24-gauge or the 22-gauge Sprotte needle. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The rate of PDPH was determined by a postoperative visit by the anesthesiologist as well as questioning patients by telephone 1 week or more after discharge. In the 24-gauge Sprotte needle group (n = 186), 2 mild and 1 moderate PDPHs were reported, for an overall rate of 1.61%. In the 22-gauge Sprotte needle group (n = 189), 2 mild and 1 moderate PDPHs were reported, for an overall rate of 1.59%. All headaches except 1 resolved within 72 hours with conservative treatment. One patient from the 22-gauge Sprotte needle group required an epidural blood patch. There were no failed blocks in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the 22-gauge Sprotte needle, when compared with the smaller 24-gauge Sprotte needle, can be used in obstetric patients without increasing the frequency of PDPH.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Anesthesia, Spinal , Cesarean Section , Headache/etiology , Needles , Spinal Puncture/adverse effects , Sterilization, Tubal , Adult , Bupivacaine , Female , Fentanyl , Humans , Lidocaine , Morphine , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...