Analysis of a Needs Assessment Survey to Develop an Online Resource Repository Supporting Nurse Anesthesia Educators.

BACKGROUND: Without highly qualified nurse anesthesia educators and administrators, the health care system will be threatened by the inadequate supply of certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs). PURPOSE: American Association of Nurse Anesthesiologists' Faculty Stabilization Task Force (FSTF) analyzed reasons for high faculty turnover and developed recommendations to support nurse anesthesia faculty and administrators. METHODS: A survey evaluated participants' current role, leadership development opportunities, mentorship experiences, and resource needs. RESULTS: Of 109 respondents, 87 (80%) were program administrators or assistant administrators with less than 5 years of experience in their role. Despite academic experience, 51% felt adequately prepared for their role. CONCLUSIONS: The FSTF provided 2 recommendations: to create a robust faculty development program for all faculty at all levels of CRNA education and a repository of information needed for program administrators and faculty to oversee and educate students in a high-quality CRNA program.

Assessing CRNA Knowledge of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity Treatment.

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare life-threatening adverse event. Due to the potential for devastating patient outcomes, it is crucial for anesthesia providers to understand appropriate LAST management. The primary aim of this study was to assess certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) knowledge of the 2020 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) LAST treatment guidelines. The secondary aim was to determine whether there was a relationship between the frequency of CRNAs' exposure to perioperative local anesthetic use and their knowledge level. A quantitative descriptive study and national American Association of Nurse Anesthetists electronic survey solicited practicing CRNAs. Survey findings revealed knowledge scores averaging 47.3% among 184 respondents. Almost all (97.8%) recognized the importance of early lipid emulsion administration. Over half (54.3%) were unaware of the recommended epinephrine dosing during LAST. No relationship was found between knowledge level and CRNAs' exposure to local anesthetics. Those who reported having immediate access to written or electronic guidelines in the event of LAST had significantly higher knowledge scores than those without access (P = .049). Implementing cognitive aids may help bridge knowledge gaps identified in this study and ensure critical steps are not missed. Further studies examining the use of cognitive aids to improve CRNA knowledge of LAST management may be beneficial in the future.

Temporary Intraoperative Handoff Report Among Nurse Anesthetists: Utilization of Standardized Handoff Tools and Barriers to Implementation.

The demanding nature of the intraoperative period presents several distractions to anesthesia providers that can hinder effective communication. Implementation of intraoperative and postoperative standardized handoff protocols have improved provider communication; however, these protocols remain underutilized. While temporary anesthesia handoffs arise more frequently than permanent handoffs, limited data exist on how the specific transfer of care processes transpire. The purpose of this study was to explore the usage of standardized handoff tools among certified registered nurse anesthetists, as well as the barriers to implementation during temporary intraoperative handoff. Data from this exploratory mixed-methods study were collected using a 16-question voluntary electronic survey. Most participants (81.2%) reported that they do not use a standardized handoff tool during temporary handoff, but over half (57.1%) believed such tools should be used. Study participants who used a standardized handoff tool were significantly less likely to rank "increases the time spent giving a handoff" as an important barrier (48.6%) compared with those who did not use a tool (71.9%), ( X2(1) = 7.39, P = .007, V = .19). Failure to make standardized handoffs a facility standard of care and lack of reception by receiving anesthesia providers were also ranked as major barriers to implementation.

Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists' occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetic agents: a survey of anesthetic gas safety.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic gases have been known to cause damage when inhaled over long periods of time. Modern safety measures have been put in place to reduce the risk to anesthesia providers, however there is continued lack of information on providers experiencing short term effects (lethargy, fatigue, headache, slowed cognitive ability, nausea, and mucosal irritation) thereby leading to long-term sequalae (sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, chromosomal aberrations, and comet assays). METHOD: A thirteen item, multiple choice survey was sent to 3,000 anesthesia providers, of which 463 completed the survey. A Chi-square test of independence was used to determine the association between gas exposure and participant self-reported symptoms. A Spearman's Correlation test was also utilized to interpret this data since both frequency of smelling gas and frequency of symptoms were ordinal variables for which Spearman's rho correlation was the appropriate measure of association. RESULTS: The major findings were that as the frequency of smelling anesthetic gas increased, so too did the frequency of self-reported headaches and fatigue. Spearman's rho = .148 and .092. P value = .002 and .049, respectively. CONCLUSION: There have been many efforts to decrease the risk of exposure of anesthesia providers to anesthetic gases. While there is a decrease in reported exposures, indications of possible long-term effects remain a concern in anesthesia providers. Potential implications of exposure could lead to chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, comet assays, spontaneous abortions, and genotoxic effects.

Chronic Opioid Use After Surgery: An Exploratory Study Examining Rural Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist Strategies to Mitigate Chronic Opioid Use and Their View of Their Role in the Opioid Crisis.

Certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) provide most of the anesthesia care in the rural United States. Rural regions of the US also have the highest opioid prescribing rates and opioid-related hospital admissions and deaths. Although CRNAs are the primary anesthesia providers in these regions, little research examines the strategies CRNAs may use to mitigate the development of chronic opioid use after surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the views of rural CRNAs regarding their role in mitigating chronic opioid use after surgery and to determine what, if any, preventative strategies they may use. A survey was developed and distributed to CRNAs practicing in rural areas of the US with the highest opioid prescribing rates. Of the 160 CRNAs who responded, 73% agreed that they could influence whether their patient developed chronic opioid use after surgery. Those who agreed were more likely to be involved in policy development to decrease opioid use. The survey also found that CRNAs with a doctoral degree, compared with those with master's level preparation, were more likely to report that they could influence whether their patient developed chronic opioid use after surgery.

The Experience of Burnout in the SRNA Population and Association With Situational and Demographic Factors.

There is limited research regarding student registered nurse anesthetist (SRNA) burnout. To our knowledge there is no recently published work that has explored the associations between characteristics of SRNAs and burnout. Addressing this gap could establish the SRNA experience of burnout, identify demographic characteristics and situational factors that may correlate with burnout, and lay the foundation for future research. The purpose of this exploratory descriptive study was to assess the SRNA experience of burnout and any relationship between burnout to demographic or situational factors via the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory-S and demographic questions.The research questions were: 1) Do SRNAs experience different levels of burnout during the didactic curricula and/or clinical training element of nurse anesthesia school? 2) Is there an association between SRNA burnout and demographic or situational factors? Power analysis set the minimum n at 421. Five hundred thirty SRNAs responded to the randomized survey through the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology. Data analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA, Spearman's rho, 2-tailed t-test, and Chi square analysis. More hours in class per week correlated with lower exhaustion scores. Higher disengagement scores were reported by SRNAs further in their training, while more hours per week in clinical correlated with both higher disengagement scores and increased total burnout scores.

Minimum Atropine Dosing in Pediatric Patients: Does CRNA Practice Reflect Current Recommendations?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) current pediatric atropine dosing practices. Emphasis was placed on rationale for dosing and knowledge regarding current literature and guidelines. An electronic survey was deployed by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA)'s survey department to a total of 2,905 CRNAs who are current AANA members. The survey was completed by 98 CRNAs, of which 67 selected that they do not administer anesthesia to pediatric patients weighing less than 5 kg and were excluded from further survey participation. The responses from the remaining 31 CRNAs were utilized for data analysis (n = 31). Approximately two thirds of participants (64.5%) were unaware of available guidelines pertaining to pediatric dosing of atropine within the last 5 years. A statistically significant difference existed when analyzing whether awareness of guidelines was associated with knowledge of the correct American Heart Association recommended pediatric atropine dose. Providers who were aware of guidelines reported the correct dose 100% of the time, whereas those unaware of guidelines reported the correct dose only 65% of the time (P = .03). Variability in clinical practices and sources guiding practice should be addressed to avoid potential overdosing in the vulnerable neonatal population.

Identifier Bouffants: An Exploration of the Impact on Verbal Communication Among Interdisciplinary Operating Room Personnel.

Effective team communication reduces errors in the perioperative environment and is an essential component of patient safety. Although name and title recognition are beneficial in enhancing communication, often members of the interdisciplinary team are unfamiliar with their colleagues. This lack of familiarity is worsened when the visual cue of a name badge is obscured under sterile scrub attire. The primary purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to explore whether or not the use of identifier bouffants, which provided a visual cue of the anesthesia provider's name and position on their forehead, impacted verbal communication and familiarity within the operating room team. Participation in this study was voluntary and data were collected using a twenty-five question Likert-Scale survey. A significant association was identified between the presence of an identifier bouffant in the operating room and self-reported increased communication amongst the interdisciplinary operating room team (z = 5.42, P <.001). Of the 72 participants meeting inclusion criteria, 59 (82%) agreed that verbal communication was enhanced by the use of identifier bouffants in the operating room. Further exploration of strategies to improve name and title recognition in the operating room setting are supported by the results of this study.

Supporting the Foundation of Nurse Anesthesia Education: A Report of the Faculty Stabilization Taskforce.

Without highly qualified educators and educational program administrators, the ability to provide anesthesia and pain management services throughout the healthcare system will be threatened by the inadequate supply of Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs). The average turnover rate between the years 2016-2020, for CRNA program administrators, was 15% with some programs changing leadership as often as every two to four years. In response, the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology (AANA) and the Council on Accreditation of Nurse Anesthesia Educational Programs (COA) created the Faculty Stabilization Taskforce (FSTF) to review reasons for the high turnover rate and to develop methods and tools to support program faculty and administrators in their role of educating the future CRNA workforce. The FSTF provided two recommendations: 1) to create a robust faculty development program for all faculty at all levels of CRNA education, and 2) to create a repository of information needed to administrate, and educate students, in a high-quality CRNA program. This article summarizes the report made to the AANA Board of Directors (BOD) which was unanimously accepted and is already being implemented by AANA and COA staff. The full text of the report can be found on the AANA's website at www.aana.com/FSTF.

Estimation of Surgical Blood Loss by Anesthesia and Surgical Trainees: Impact of an Educational Intervention on Interrater Reliability.

Intraoperative blood loss estimation by members of the anesthesia and surgical teams is often inaccurate, with potentially detrimental clinical consequences. Despite this, few trainees receive standardized training in blood loss estimation. This study examined the impact of an educational intervention for visual blood loss estimation on anesthesia and surgical trainees' accuracy and interrater reliability. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with student registered nurse anesthetists (SRNAs) and orthopedic surgery residents. The groups' mean visual blood loss estimations at 7 simulated stations were compared before and after an educational intervention. Low, moderate, and high blood loss volumes were simulated with common operating room materials and theater blood. Of the 42 participants, 29 (70%) reported no previous formal training in blood loss estimation. Before the educational intervention, orthopedic surgery residents underestimated blood loss values at all stations, whereas the SRNAs tended toward overestimation. Following the educational intervention, there was no significant difference between the groups' mean estimations. Both groups had a significant reduction in estimation error and improved interrater reliability (P<.001). The results of this study demonstrate that a multimodal educational intervention can improve visual blood loss estimations by surgical and anesthesia trainees, supporting implementation of such programs during anesthesia and surgical training.

Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists' Management of the Perioperative Do-Not-Resuscitate Order: Evaluating Trends in Required Reconsideration.

Required reconsideration or review of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders perioperatively is recommended by the American Association of Nurse Anesthesiology and other organizations instead of automatic suspension of the DNR. A survey on perioperative DNR orders developed for a 2000 study by Coopmans and Gries was amended, reviewed by an expert panel, reformatted for web-based layout, and emailed to a random sample of 3,000 practicing Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) in the United States. From 207 returned responses, most CRNAs (63.5%) initially reported unfamiliarity with required reconsideration. After receiving a definition of the term, more CRNAs reported familiarity and past education on the concept. Chi-square analyses showed that familiarity with required reconsideration was associated with potential refusal to care for patients with active DNR orders (P=.004). CRNAs reported education or training on required reconsideration as uncommon and often informal. The survey found significant changes in reported perioperative DNR orders at practice institutions between the original survey by Coopmans and Gries and the present study. CRNAs' responses from the present survey indicate significant increases in policies of required review with patient involvement and policies of informed routine suspension (P<.001). Findings also revealed a significant decrease in reported policies of uninformed routine suspension (P<.001).

Decreasing handoff-related care failures in children's hospitals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient handoffs in health care require transfer of information, responsibility, and authority between providers. Suboptimal patient handoffs pose a serious safety risk. Studies demonstrating the impact of improved patient handoffs on care failures are lacking. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multihospital collaborative designed to decrease handoff-related care failures. METHODS: Twenty-three children's hospitals participated in a quality improvement collaborative aimed at reducing handoff-related care failures. The improvement was guided by evidence-based recommendations regarding handoff intent and content, standardized handoff tools/methods, and clear transition of responsibility. Hospitals tailored handoff elements to locally important handoff types. Handoff-related care failures were compared between baseline and 3 intervention periods. Secondary outcomes measured compliance to specific change package elements and balancing measure of staff satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-three children's hospitals evaluated 7864 handoffs over the 12-month study period. Handoff-related care failures decreased from baseline (25.8%) to the final intervention period (7.9%) (P < .05). Significant improvement was observed in every handoff type studied. Compliance to change package elements improved (achieving a common understanding about the patient from 86% to 96% [P < .05]; clear transition of responsibility from 92% to 96% [P < .05]; and minimized interruptions and distractions from 84% to 90% [P < .05]) as did overall satisfaction with the handoff (from 55% to 70% [P < .05]). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a standardized evidence-based handoff process across 23 children's hospitals resulted in a significant decrease in handoff-related care failures, observed over all handoff types. Compliance to critical components of the handoff process improved, as did provider satisfaction.