Malignant phaeochromocytoma metastasising to the breast.

BACKGROUND: Nearly one-quarter of metastatic tumours in the breast are from an occult extramammary tumour, usually a lung carcinoma. AIM: To report on a patient with a history of metastatic malignant phaeochromocytoma and a breast mass. RESULT: A 54-year-old female presented with a right breast mass. At the age of 32, she had presented with a phaeochromocytoma. The staining of the breast mass was comparable with that of her original adrenal tumour. CONCLUSION: This is the first published case of a phaeochromocytoma metastasising to the breast, and demonstrates the challenge that extramammary tumours in the breast can pose for the pathologist.

Soluble adhesion molecules (E-selectin, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1) in breast carcinoma.

Adhesion molecules are important in cell-cell and cell-basement membrane interactions. They are intimately involved in inflammatory reactions and a role in tumour progression has been postulated. E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) play a role in cell adhesion to the vascular endothelium, and may have a role in tumour cell dissemination. Soluble forms of these molecules have been described and this study was established to examine these adhesion molecules in patients with breast carcinoma. Serum was obtained from 92 patients with breast carcinoma and 31 age-matched patients with benign breast disease. All samples were obtained prior to surgery. Soluble levels of E-selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were significantly elevated in patients with Stage 4 disease compared with controls. (E-selectin 88.6 (47.9) versus 51.4 (18.4) ng/ml; P<0.001: ICAM-1 447 (249) versus 244 (79) ng/ml; P<0.001: VCAM-1 779 (159) versus 552 (135) ng/ml; P<0.001 results expressed on mean (SEM) SD placed above this.). The prognostic value of the adhesion molecules was examined. In patients with Stage 2 disease, elevated VCAM-1 was predictive of decreased survival, even when corrected for T and N status. Adhesion molecules are elevated in patients with advanced disease and elevation in VCAM-1 has prognostic significance in patients with breast carcinoma.

An immunohistochemical study of p21 and p53 expression in primary node-positive breast carcinoma.

AIMS: p21, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase, is involved in the p53 pathway of growth control. Its expression has been linked to cellular differentiation. It has been implicated in p53-mediated growth arrest following DNA damage and in terminally differentiated cells. This study analysed p21 and p53 expression, in a series of node-positive patients with breast carcinoma and examined histopathological parameters of the tumour and the prognostic implications of p21 and p53 expression. METHODS: One hundred and five consecutive patients with node-positive disease and at least 3 years follow-up were identified. Sections were stained for p53 and p21 using monoclonal antibodies. Results were expressed as percentage positive cells, and over 20% considered positive for p53 and over 10% considered for p21. RESULTS: p21 was overexpressed (>10% of cells positive) in 65% of patients and p53 was overexpressed (>20% of cells positive in 68%. The mean (SEM) level of p21 staining was 5.7(0.8)% and was 54.9(4.0)% for p53. There was no correlation between p21 and p53 expression (r=0.071 P=0.5). There were no significant differences in demographic criteria between patients that were p21 positive or negative and p53 positive or negative. There were no significant differences in tumour type, grade or stage between the groups. p21 expression did not have prognostic significance; however, p53 positivity was associated with a worse prognosis, which remained when controlled for stage. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated p21 overexpression in 65% of patients with node-positive breast carcinoma. Levels did not correlate with p53 status and unlike p53 failed to have prognostic significance.

Advantages of a posterior fourchette incision in anal sphincter repair.

PURPOSE: Delayed repair of obstetric-related anal sphincter injury remains problematic, and perineal wound breakdown is common. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome after overlap anal sphincter repair and to determine the advantages, if any, of a posterior fourchette incision (n = 18) compared with a conventional perineal incision (n = 32). METHODS: Fifty females of mean parity 2.8 (standard deviation, 1.6) underwent repair in a five-year period. The mean follow-up was 23 months. Assessment was by anal vector manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and continence scoring. RESULTS: Functional outcomes were similar in the two groups. Repair increased squeeze-pressure increment and improved continence scores in both groups. Postoperative wound complications were fewer when a posterior fourchette incision was used compared with a perineal incision (11 vs. 44 percent, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed anal sphincter repair improves continence. A posterior fourchette approach is associated with fewer postoperative wound complications without compromising the quality of repair and the functional outcome.

The prognostic significance of CD44s and CD44v6 expression in stage two breast carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study.

AIMS: Expression of the v6 variant isoform of CD44 has been causally associated with the development of metastases. This study, using immunohistochemical techniques, examined the prognostic significance of CD44s and CD44v6 expression. METHODS: A cohort of 109 women presenting with stage 2 breast cancer, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years, were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty percent of patients demonstrated CD44v6 expression on immunohistochemical studies. CD44v6 expression in tissue sections was found to be independent of age, tumour size, grade, and lymph-node status. No significant association was demonstrated between CD44v6 expression and either disease-free or overall survival. Similar findings were observed for CD44s. CONCLUSIONS: CD44s and CD44v6 do not appear to be useful as prognostic indicators in early breast cancer. The increased expression of variant CD44 isoforms seen in breast neoplasia may merely be a marker for loss of control of alternative splicing within tumour tissue.

Timing of pre-emptive tenoxicam is important for postoperative analgesia.

PURPOSE: In this prospective randomized study, a comparison was made between the efficacy of 20 mg tenoxicam, administered either, 30 min preoperatively or at induction of anesthesia, for the relief of postoperative pain in patients undergoing ambulatory breast biopsy. METHODS: Seventy-three patients were recruited and all received a standard anesthetic consisting of induction with 2 mg x kg(-1) propofol followed by 5 microg x kg(-1) alfentanyl. No premedication was administered and at the end of the procedure the wounds were infiltrated with 10 ml of bupivacaine (0.5%). Patients were randomized to receive 20 mg tenoxicam intraveneously either 30 min before surgery or at induction of anesthesia. RESULTS: Demographic criteria were similar in both groups. There were differences in pain scores at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min postoperatively (VAS at 30 min 3.2 +/- 1.2 vs 5.5 +/- 1.8; P < 0.001: VAS at 60 min 1.8 +/- 1.2 vs 3.7 +/- 1.9; P < 0.001: VAS at 120 min 0.9 +/- 0.9 vs 1.7 +/- 1.0; P = 0.003: VAS at 240 min 0.5 +/- 0.5 vs 1.1 +/- 0.8; P < 0.001: Expressed as mean +/- SD). There was a difference in the number of patients requiring additional analgesia, in the first four hours postoperatively (12 (33%) vs 27 (73%); P = 0.001) and a difference in the time to additional analgesia in these patients (87.5 +/- 32.5 vs 55.0 +/- 26.8 min; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Early administration of pre-emptive tenoxicam 30 min before induction of anesthesia improves postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing ambulatory breast biopsy.

Preemptive bupivacaine offers no advantages to postoperative wound infiltration in analgesia for outpatient breast biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Adequate analgesia is important after surgery and in particular after ambulatory surgery. Preemptive administration of analgesics, ie, prior to commencing surgery, has many theoretical advantages. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, the use of preincisional bupivacaine was compared with a postincision dose for the relief of postoperative pain, in 74 patients undergoing day-case breast biopsy. RESULTS: Demographic criteria were similar in both groups. There were no differences in pain scores postoperatively on the visual analog scale (VAS): VAS at 30 minutes 4.5 ([SD] 2.4) versus 4.7 (1.9); P = not significant (NS); VAS at 60 minutes 3.3 (2. 3) versus 3.6 (2.2); P = NS; VAS at 120 minutes 1.9 (1.7) versus 2.5 (2.0); P = NS; VAS at 240 minutes 0.9 (1.0) versus 1.3 (1.4); P = NS. There was no difference in the number of patients requiring additional analgesia: 13 (36%) versus 18 (47%); P = NS. Nor was there a difference in the time to additional analgesia: 55.0 (37.8) versus 55.3 (39.2) minutes; P = NS. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of local anaesthesia prior to starting surgery does not appear to have any advantage over its postoperative administration in patients undergoing ambulatory breast biopsy.

An assessment of the value of intraperitoneal meperidine for analgesia postlaparoscopic tubal ligation.

UNLABELLED: Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures may experience postoperative pain. The intraperitoneal (IP) administration of drugs is controversial but has proven effective in some studies for the relief of postoperative pain. However, some investigators have not been able to confirm the analgesic efficacy of IP local anesthetics. The administration of IP opioids for the relief of postoperative pain has received little attention. At the end of laparoscopic tubal ligation, 100 patients received 80 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine IP and 50 mg of meperidine either IP or IM. Postoperative pain scores were measured at rest and with movement. Pain scores were significantly lower in the group receiving the IP meperidine both at rest (P: < 0.01) and with movement (P: < 0.05). We conclude that the combination of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and intraperitoneal meperidine was better than the combination of IP bupivacaine and IM meperidine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation. IMPLICATIONS: The combination of bupivacaine and meperidine delivered to the intraperitoneal cavity proved superior to equivalent doses of intraperitoneal bupivacaine and IM meperidine for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation. Intraperitoneal delivery of analgesia proved effective in this study and merits further study and more widespread use.

The effect of rectal diclofenac on pruritus in patients receiving intrathecal morphine.

In this prospective randomised study, pruritus and pain were evaluated in patients undergoing abdominal surgery in which intrathecal morphine was administered. Each patient received intrathecal morphine 0.3 mg prior to induction, followed by a standard anaesthetic. The patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. One group received 100 mg of rectal diclofenac immediately post-induction. Patients receiving diclofenac had significantly lower pruritus scores at 30 min (p = 0.0076), 2, 4, 8 and 24 h postoperatively, as well as significantly reduced pain scores at each time point (p < 0.0001 at each study interval). Morphine consumption in the first 24 h was also significantly lower in this group. In conclusion, rectal administration of diclofenac significantly reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative pruritus. It also significantly reduces pain and further analgesic requirements postoperatively.

Intra-articular tenoxicam improves postoperative analgesia in knee arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: Non Steroidal Anti-inflammatory drugs have a well documented benefit in the relief of postoperative pain. This study was designed to compare the analgesic effect of intra-articular tenoxicam 20 mg with intravenous tenoxicam on postoperative pain in 88 patients undergoing day case knee arthroscopy. METHODS: A prospective, double blind, randomized trial was performed. All patients received a standard general anesthetic. Patients in group A received 20 mg tenoxicam made up to 40 ml with normal saline intra-articularly (ia) and 2 ml normal saline i.v. Patients in group B received 40 ml normal saline intra-articularly and 2 ml, 20 mg of tenoxicam, i.v. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were similar with respect to age, weight, sex and tourniquet inflation time. Patients receiving ia tenoxicam had lower pain scores (at rest and upon movement) at 30, 60, 120 and 180 min postoperatively (0.8+/-0.2 vs. 2.5+/-0.2 at rest and 1.24+/-0.2 vs. 3.4+/-0.2 at movement at 60 min; P< 0.0001). Fewer patients required additional analgesia in the first four hours postoperatively (33% vs. 84%; P<0.00001) and the time to first analgesia (23.7+/-11.2 vs. 9.4+/-0.6; P<0.02) was longer in those receiving ia tenoxicam. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular tenoxicam provides superior postoperative analgesia and reduces postoperative analgesic requirements compared with i.v. tenoxicam in patients undergoing day case knee arthroscopy.

The effect of intravenous tenoxicam on pruritus in patients receiving epidural fentanyl.

In this prospective randomised study, pruritus and pain were evaluated in patients undergoing abdominal surgery during which epidural fentanyl was administered. All patients had an epidural catheter inserted at the time of surgery. Epidural fentanyl 100 micrograms was administered intra-operatively and infused at a concentration of 2 micrograms.ml-1 for 48 h postoperatively. All patients received a standard anaesthetic and, in addition, the study group had a 20 mg bolus of tenoxicam intravenously, intra-operatively. Patients receiving tenoxicam demonstrated significantly lower pruritus and pain scores at 30 min, 2, 4, 8 and 24 h postoperatively as well as reduced pethidine requirements for breakthrough pain in the first 24 h. In conclusion, tenoxicam 20 mg significantly reduces the incidence and severity of postoperative pruritus in patients who received peri-operative epidural fentanyl. In addition, it significantly reduces pain and further analgesic requirements postoperatively.

Papillary carcinoma in a thyroglossal duct remnant--a review of thyroglossal surgery in a regional centre in the west of Ireland.

A review of thyroglossal duct remnants presenting to a regional centre in the West of Ireland was undertaken. Over a 15 yr period, 25 patients were operated on for duct remnants. The mean age was 19.6 yr and ranged from 3 to 68 yr. There were 16 (64 per cent) males and 9 (36 per cent) females. Seventeen (68 per cent) patients were less than 20 years at the time of surgery. Four patients presented with a sinus and the remainder with a cystic lesion. Two patients experienced recurrent disease. One patient, a 41 yr old female, had a papillary carcinoma of a thyroglossal cyst. There were no clinical features distinguishing this patient from those with benign cystic remnants of the thyroglossal duct. The possibility of carcinoma in older patients, in particular females, presenting with thyroglossal cysts emphasises the importance of performing a formal Sistrunk's operation. It reduces the risk of recurrence of the cyst and may reduce the risk of recurrence of the tumour as the duct may provide a route for the spread of tumour.

Analgesia following appendicectomy--the value of peritoneal bupivacaine.

PURPOSE: Peritoneal inflammation is an important feature in many patients presenting with appendicitis. The contribution of peritoneal nerve fibres to pain experienced after appendicectomy has received little attention. METHOD: In this prospective double blind randomized study a consecutive series of 60 patients undergoing appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis were enrolled. A dose of 1.5 mg.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.5% was used. Group one patients received the entire dose of bupivacaine subcutaneously. Group two patients received half the dose subcutaneously (s.c.) and half the dose to the peritoneum. Pain scores were assessed pre-operatively and at 30 min, 12 and 24 hr post-operatively using a visual analogue scale. Time to first analgesia and total analgesia requirements in the first 24 hr were recorded. RESULTS: The patients receiving the s.c. combined with peritoneal bupivacaine had a lower pain score 30 min post-operatively (32 +/- 2 vs 54 +/- 4; P < 0.0001), a longer time to first analgesia (248 +/- 20 vs 164 +/- 17 min; P = 0.002) as well as lower opioid (68 +/- 5 vs 100 +/- 7 mg; P = 0.0002) and non steroidal analgesic requirements (65 +/- 6 vs 96 +/- 6 mg; P = 0.007) in the first 24 hr post-operatively. CONCLUSION: A combination of s.c. and peritoneal infiltration with bupivacaine is superior to skin infiltration alone in the relief of pain post appendicectomy.

A prospective study comparing intravenous tenoxicam with rectal diclofenac for pain relief in day case surgery.

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared intravenous tenoxicam with rectal diclofenac for post-operative pain relief after day case arthroscopy or laparoscopic sterilization. Intravenous tenoxicam (40 mg) was administered as a single bolus at induction, or rectal diclofenac (100 mg) was administered immediately after induction. Both groups were similar with respect to age, weight, sex of the patients, the operation performed and the operative time. There were no significant differences observed between the groups for pain scores at 30 min, 60 min and 24 h post-operatively. The time to first analgesic requirement, the dose of pethidine administered and total analgesic requirements in the first 24 h post-operatively were equivalent in both groups. In view of the similar efficacy of both of these drugs, patient preference and ease of administration, the use of tenoxicam is appropriate in many patients undergoing day case surgery.

Analgesia in day case breast biopsy--the value of pre-emptive tenoxicam.

PURPOSE: Inadequate analgesia is a major problem following ambulatory surgery. In this prospective randomised study, the use of pre-operative intravenous tenoxicam (a non steroidal anti-inflammatory agent) was compared with post-incision tenoxicam for the relief of post-operative pain in 77 patients undergoing day case breast biopsy. METHODS: All patients received a standard general anaesthetic which included infiltration of the wound with bupivacalne after skin closure. Intravenous tenoxicam (20 mg) was administered as a single bolus either 30 min before surgery (37 patients) or after incision (40 patients). Pain scores (100 mm visual analog scale) were obtained at 30, 60, 120 and 240 min after surgery analgesic requirements recorded. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were similar with respect to age, weight, operative time and length of the incision. Patients receiving the tenoxicam 30 min before surgery had lower pain scores at 30 min (22 +/- 3) vs 46 +/- 3; P < 0.0001), 60 min (9 +/- 2 vs 28 +/- 3); P < 0.0001), 120 min (6 +/- 2 vs 16 +/- 3); P = 0.0002) and 240 min (3 +/- 1) vs 7 +/- 2); P = 0.02) post-operatively. They had a longer time to first analgesia (55.1 +/- 4.6 vs 29.6 +/- 2.6) min; P = 0.0004), required less meperidine (5.4 +/- 2.6 vs 18.8 +/- 3.9) mg; P = 0.007) and were more likely not to require any further analgesia during the first four hours post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Pre-operatively administered tenoxicam provides superior post-operative analgesia than tenoxicam administered after surgical incision in patients undergoing breast biopsy.