Older person's preferences for home vs hospital care in the treatment of acute illness.

BACKGROUND: Although the home is expanding as a potential site for acute illness treatment, little is known about patients' preferences for home vs the hospital. OBJECTIVE: To determine older persons' preferences for home or hospital as a treatment site for acute illness and factors associated with preference. METHODS: Two hundred forty-six community-dwelling persons aged 65 years or older hospitalized with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia were identified in 2 urban teaching hospitals and received telephone interviews 2 months after hospitalization. They were asked their preference for home or hospital treatment, given the availability of equivalent therapies and outcomes at the 2 sites and a nursing visit and several hours of home health aide assistance daily in the home. They were also asked about changes in preference with changes in the description of the outcome or the availability of services. RESULTS: If home and hospital offered equivalent outcomes, 46% of the sample preferred treatment at home. Preferences were heavily dependent on the outcome of the illness, physician opinion about the best site of care, and the provision of house calls. Higher education, white race, living with a spouse, being deeply religious, and having 2 or more dependencies in activities of daily living were associated with a preference for home treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of equivalent outcome, preferences for treatment site are almost equally divided between home and hospital. Explicit elucidation of preferences is necessary if patients' preferences are to play a meaningful role in decision making about site of care.

Older persons' perceptions of home and hospital as sites of treatment for acute illness.

PURPOSE: Home care is increasingly being used as a substitute for hospital care. This study examined older patients' perceptions of the home and of the hospital as treatment sites for acute illness and the patient characteristics that are associated with these perceptions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A series of questions derived from open-ended interviews supplemented by literature review were administered by telephone in a cross-sectional, descriptive study to community-dwelling persons age 65 years or older who had been hospitalized 2 months earlier with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia. RESULTS: Among 246 participants, nearly equal proportions agreed with statements that the home and the hospital would be comfortable sites of care (54% versus 55%), that the home and the hospital would provide rapid recovery (41% versus 37%), and that home treatment and hospital treatment would be burdensome on family and friends (40% versus 33%). Although 93% would feel safe in the hospital, only 42% would feel safe at home. Perceptions were not associated with sociodemographic characteristics, primary diagnosis, self-rated health, depression, or social support. Functionally dependent patients had more positive perceptions of treatment at home. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of perceptions of home and hospital can facilitate assessing the acceptability of shifting acute care from hospital to home. Our findings suggest that successful expansion of acute home care will require flexibility in the use of home and hospital as well as education to change perceptions about the safety and efficacy of treatment at home.

Older persons' preferences for site of terminal care.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about patients' preferences for site of terminal care. OBJECTIVE: To describe older persons' preferences for home or hospital as the site of terminal care and to explore potential reasons for their preferences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative interviews. SETTING: Participants' homes. PATIENTS: Community-dwelling persons 65 years of age or older who were recently hospitalized with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pneumonia and were not selected according to life expectancy; 246 patients participated in quantitative interviews and 29 participated in qualitative interviews. MEASUREMENTS: Preference for site of terminal care and the reasons for that preference. RESULTS: In quantitative interviews, 118 patients (48%) preferred terminal care in the hospital, 106 (43%) preferred home, and 22 (9%) did not know. One third changed their preference when asked about their preference in the event of a nonterminal illness. Reasons for preference identified during qualitative interviews included the desire to be with family members and concerns about burden to family members and their ability to provide necessary care. Concern about long-term care needs resulted in preference for a nursing home when choice was not constrained to home and hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Preference for home as the site of care for terminal illness exceeds existing practice. However, the current debate about home versus hospital as the ideal site for end-of-life care may ignore an important issue to older persons--namely, the care of disabilities that precede death.