Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Air Med J ; 43(2): 106-110, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490772

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although a small proportion of helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) missions are for pediatric patients, it is recognized that children do present unique challenges. This case series aims to evaluate the intubation first-pass success rate in HEMS pediatric patients for both medical and trauma patients in a UK semiurban environment. METHODS: A retrospective review of the computerized records system was performed from January 1, 2015, to July 31, 2022, at 1 UK HEMS. Anonymous data relating to advanced airway interventions in patients < 16 years of age were extracted. Primary analysis related to the first-pass success rate was performed; secondary analysis relating to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the pediatric patients requiring prehospital anesthesia (rapid sequence induction with drugs) and first-pass success rates by clinician group was also performed. RESULTS: Of the pediatric patients, 15.8% required intubation. The overall first-pass success rate for intubation (including in cardiac arrest) was 83.5%; for prehospital anesthesia (drugs administered), it was 98.4%. First-pass success rates were lowest for those under 2 years of age (45.2% without drugs and 87.5% with drugs). There was no difference between physician background in the first-pass success rate. The median GCS for pediatric prehospital anesthesia was 7 versus 5 for adults (P = .012). No children with an initial GCS of 15 had prehospital anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The overall intubation first-pass success rates for pediatric patients is high at 83.5% and higher still for prehospital anesthesia (98.4%). However, it remains a rare intervention for clinicians, and children under 2 years of age require special consideration.


Subject(s)
Air Ambulances , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Medicine , Adult , Humans , Child , Infant , Retrospective Studies , Aircraft , Intubation, Intratracheal
2.
JAMA ; 330(19): 1862-1871, 2023 11 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824132

ABSTRACT

Importance: Bleeding is the most common cause of preventable death after trauma. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) when used in the emergency department along with standard care vs standard care alone on mortality in trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, bayesian, randomized clinical trial conducted at 16 major trauma centers in the UK. Patients aged 16 years or older with exsanguinating hemorrhage were enrolled between October 2017 and March 2022 and followed up for 90 days. Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to a strategy that included REBOA and standard care (n = 46) or standard care alone (n = 44). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Ten secondary outcomes included mortality at 6 months, while in the hospital, and within 24 hours, 6 hours, or 3 hours; the need for definitive hemorrhage control procedures; time to commencement of definitive hemorrhage control procedures; complications; length of stay; blood product use; and cause of death. Results: Of the 90 patients (median age, 41 years [IQR, 31-59 years]; 62 [69%] were male; and the median Injury Severity Score was 41 [IQR, 29-50]) randomized, 89 were included in the primary outcome analysis because 1 patient in the standard care alone group declined to provide consent for continued participation and data collection 4 days after enrollment. At 90 days, 25 of 46 patients (54%) had experienced all-cause mortality in the REBOA and standard care group vs 18 of 43 patients (42%) in the standard care alone group (odds ratio [OR], 1.58 [95% credible interval, 0.72-3.52]; posterior probability of an OR >1 [indicating increased odds of death with REBOA], 86.9%). Among the 10 secondary outcomes, the ORs for mortality and the posterior probabilities of an OR greater than 1 for 6-month, in-hospital, and 24-, 6-, or 3-hour mortality were all increased in the REBOA and standard care group, and the ORs were increased with earlier mortality end points. There were more deaths due to bleeding in the REBOA and standard care group (8 of 25 patients [32%]) than in standard care alone group (3 of 18 patients [17%]), and most occurred within 24 hours. Conclusions and Relevance: In trauma patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage, a strategy of REBOA and standard care in the emergency department does not reduce, and may increase, mortality compared with standard care alone. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16184981.


Subject(s)
Balloon Occlusion , Exsanguination , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Exsanguination/complications , Bayes Theorem , Retrospective Studies , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Aorta , Balloon Occlusion/adverse effects , Balloon Occlusion/methods , Resuscitation/methods , Injury Severity Score , Emergency Service, Hospital , United Kingdom
3.
Br J Anaesth ; 130(5): 636-644, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36858888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Front-of-neck access (FONA) is an emergency procedure used as a last resort to achieve a patent airway in the prehospital environment. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the number and success rate of FONA procedures in the prehospital setting, including changes since 2017, when a surgical technique was outlined as the first-line prehospital method. METHODS: A systematic literature search (PROSPERO CRD42022348975) was performed from inception of databases to July 2022 to identify studies in patients of any age undergoing prehospital FONA, followed by data extraction. Meta-analysis was used to derive pooled success rates. Methodological quality of included studies was interpreted using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: From 909 studies, 69 studies were included (33 low quality; 36 very low quality) with 3292 prehospital FONA attempts described (1229 available for analysis). The crude median success rate increased from 99.2% before 2017 to 100.0% after 2017. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled overall FONA success rate of 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.0-91.0%). Surgical techniques had the highest success rate at a median of 100.0% (pooled rate=92.0%; 95% CI, 88.0-95.0%) vs 50.0% for needle techniques (pooled rate=52.0%; 95% CI, 28.0-76.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a relatively rare procedure in the prehospital setting, the success rate for FONA is high. A surgical technique for FONA appears more successful than needle techniques, and supports existing UK prehospital guidelines. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL: PROSPERO CRD42022348975.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Intubation, Intratracheal , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Emergency Medical Services/methods
4.
J Chem Inf Model ; 61(2): 699-714, 2021 02 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33494610

ABSTRACT

Enrichment of ligands versus property-matched decoys is widely used to test and optimize docking library screens. However, the unconstrained optimization of enrichment alone can mislead, leading to false confidence in prospective performance. This can arise by over-optimizing for enrichment against property-matched decoys, without considering the full spectrum of molecules to be found in a true large library screen. Adding decoys representing charge extrema helps mitigate over-optimizing for electrostatic interactions. Adding decoys that represent the overall characteristics of the library to be docked allows one to sample molecules not represented by ligands and property-matched decoys but that one will encounter in a prospective screen. An optimized version of the DUD-E set (DUDE-Z), as well as Extrema and sets representing broad features of the library (Goldilocks), is developed here. We also explore the variability that one can encounter in enrichment calculations and how that can temper one's confidence in small enrichment differences. The new tools and new decoy sets are freely available at http://tldr.docking.org and http://dudez.docking.org.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Ligands , Models, Molecular , Prospective Studies , Protein Binding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...