ABSTRACT
Fluorescent probes are an indispensable tool in the realm of bioimaging technologies, providing valuable insights into the assessment of biomaterial integrity and structural properties. However, incorporating fluorophores into scaffolds made from melt electrowriting (MEW) poses a challenge due to the sustained, elevated temperatures that this processing technique requires. In this context, [n]cycloparaphenylenes ([n]CPPs) serve as excellent fluorophores for MEW processing with the additional benefit of customizable emissions profiles with the same excitation wavelength. Three fluorescent blends are used with distinct [n]CPPs with emission wavelengths of either 466, 494, or 533 nm, identifying 0.01 wt% as the preferred concentration. It is discovered that [n]CPPs disperse well within poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and maintain their fluorescence even after a week of continuous heating at 80 °C. The [n]CPP-PCL blends show no cytotoxicity and support counterstaining with commonly used DAPI (Ex/Em: 359 nm/457 nm), rhodamine- (Ex/Em: 542/565 nm), and fluorescein-tagged (Ex/Em: 490/515 nm) phalloidin stains. Using different color [n]CPP-PCL blends, different MEW fibers are sequentially deposited into a semi-woven scaffold and onto a solution electrospun membrane composed of [8]CPP-PCL as a contrasting substrate for the [10]CPP-PCL MEW fibers. In general, [n]CPPs are potent fluorophores for MEW, providing new imaging options for this technology.
ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, melt electrowriting (MEW) has established the fundamental understanding of processing (and printer) requirements. Iterative work on parametric development and dissemination of this recent additive manufacturing technology has been performed across many systems and polymers (mainly poly-(ε-caprolactone)), showing similarities and trends. However, the software and hardware ecosystems of MEW are not mature. Further, due to its multi-parametric nature, MEW can be challenging for laboratories to master. This review intends to provide a unique perspective on the dynamic relationship between MEW processing parameters. Such parameters can be divided into 1) those that affect the polymer flow rate to or 2) from the nozzle, and 3) environmental conditions. The most influential parameters for high-quality printing are applied voltage, applied pressure, collector speed, polymer temperature, nozzle diameter, and the conditions that lead to charge buildup (e.g., relative humidity). Other factors such as ambient temperature, nozzle size, and protrusion, collector temperature and conductivity, and collector distance can all affect the process. Success for MEW printing means fibers fall onto the collector according to their pre-programmed path with predicted fiber diameter. Here, the authors elucidate how the dynamic relationship between these parameters can converge into ideal printing conditions to produce scaffolds.
