The adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 reverses the locomotor suppression and tremulous jaw movements induced by haloperidol in rats: possible relevance to parkinsonism.

Recent evidence indicates that adenosine A2A receptors modulate the activity of striatal neurons, and that antagonists of this receptor may have actions in various animal models related to motor function. Four experiments were conducted to study the effects of systemic injections of the adenosine A2A antagonist KF17837 on the behavioral effects produced by repeated administration of the dopamine (DA) antagonist haloperidol. In the first two experiments, it was shown that repeated 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol severely suppressed open-field locomotor activity, and that KF17837 (0.0-20.0 mg/kg) did not significantly increase open-field locomotor activity. The third experiment demonstrated that injections of KF17837 (0.0-20.0 mg/kg) completely reversed the suppression of locomotion induced by haloperidol, and also increased rearing behavior in haloperidol-treated rats. Previous research has reported that haloperidol induces tremulous jaw movements that have many of the characteristics of parkinsonian tremor. The fourth experiment demonstrated that i.p. injections of KF17837 (0.0-20.0 mg/kg) also suppressed haloperidol-induced tremulous jaw movements. Taken together, the results of these experiments indicate that adenosine A2A antagonism can reverse the locomotor suppression and tremulous movements induced by DA antagonism. This profile of activity is consistent with the hypothesis that antagonism of adenosine A2A receptors can result in an antiparkinsonian effect in animal models.

Selective imidazoline I2 ligands do not show antidepressant-like activity in the forced swim test in mice.

Clonidine is an adrenergic agonist with high affinity for alpha2 adrenoceptors that also has affinity for imidazoline receptors. Clonidine has previously been shown to reduce immobility in the forced swim test (FST) in mice. In the present study, this effect was blocked by idazoxan (0.06 mg/kg s.c.) and by yohimbine (1.0 mg/kg s.c.) suggesting that clonidine's effects in this test are mediated via its action at alpha2 sites. Imidazoline I2 site ligands have been shown to inhibit monoamine oxidase and thus may also have antidepressant activity. Three compounds with selective affinity for I2 receptors (BU224, BU239, BDF 8082) were also tested in the FST. These compounds showed no activity either alone or in combination with a subthreshold dose of imipramine in the FST. These results suggest that I2 receptor ligands do not show antidepressant-like activity in the FST in mice. Furthermore the activity of the mixed alpha2/I1 agonist clonidine is most likely to be due to its action at alpha2 sites.

Role of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) receptors in the mediation of behavior in the forced swim test in mice.

The purpose of this study was to further examine the effect of activation of 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B) receptors in the forced swim test in mice and to determine if activation of these receptors played a role in the mediation of the effects of the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine. The 5-HT(1A) agonist 8-OH-DPAT decreased immobility in the forced swim test in mice as previously described. Both the selective 5-HT(1B) agonist anpirtoline (1.25-5 mg/kg) and mixed 5-HT(1A/B) agonist RU24969 (0.6-2.5 mg/kg) significantly increased time spent swimming in the FST.

Neuroprotective effects of LY379268, a selective mGlu2/3 receptor agonist: investigations into possible mechanism of action in vivo.

The mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of the group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonist LY379268 were investigated in a gerbil model of global ischemia. LY379268 (10 mg/kg i.p.) 30 or 60 min after 5-min bilateral carotid artery occlusion (BCAO) attenuated the ischemia-induced hyperactivity and provided protection in the CA1 hippocampal cells. This neuroprotective effect was maintained (P <.001) when histological analysis was performed 14 and 28 days after BCAO. Furthermore, 24- or 48-h pretreatment with LY379268, 10 mg/kg i.p., before 5-min BCAO markedly reduced (P <.001 and P <.05, respectively) the damage to CA1 hippocampal neurons. This result is consistent with the induction of neuroprotective factors or a very long brain half-life. To study the possible induction of neuroprotective factors as contributing to this action of LY379268, brains were examined for expression of neurotrophic factors. Results indicated that LY379268 (10 mg/kg i.p.) failed to alter the expression of transforming growth factor-beta, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor in the hippocampal regions of brains taken from gerbils sacrificed at 6, 24, 72, and 120 h postinjection. The new group II mGlu antagonist, LY341495, administered 1 h before 5-min BCAO, attenuated the neuroprotective effect of LY379268 administered 24 h before 5-min BCAO. Complementary pharmacokinetic studies showed that a significant receptor-active concentration persisted in the brain 24 h after LY379268 10 mg/kg i.p. We conclude that group II mGluR occupancy, rather than induction of neuroprotective factors, explains the long-lasting neuroprotective effect of LY379268 in the gerbil model of global ischemia.

5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonist, SKF99101H, induces locomotor hyperactivity in the guinea pig.

Previous studies in guinea pigs have shown that while a serotonin 5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonist, GR46611, does not induce locomotor activation when given alone, it markedly enhances the locomotor response to selective 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone. In these studies, we found that another 5-HT(1B/D) agonist, 3-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-4-chloro-5-propoxyindole hemifumarate (SKF99101H), significantly elevated locomotor activity in guinea pigs when given alone. We assessed the relative contribution of 5-HT1(1A) and 5-HT(1B/D) receptors in the mediation of this effect. Activity was measured by photobeam interrupts in opaque Perspex cylinders linked to a computer. SKF99101H (20 mg/kg s. c.) significantly increased the locomotor activity in guinea pigs. The locomotor stimulant effect of SKF99101H (20 mg/kg s.c) was reversed by the selective 5-HT(1B/D) receptor antagonist N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl -1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)[1,1biphenyl]4-carboxamide (GR127935; 0.06-0. 25 mg/kg s.c.). The 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY100635; 0.05-0.25 mg/kg s.c.), slightly but significantly attenuated the hyperactivity induced by SKF99101H. These findings suggest that 5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonists may require concomitant activation of 5-HT(1A) receptors to induce locomotor activity in guinea pigs. The 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist 6[2-[4-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methylene]-1-piperidinyl]-ethyl]-7-methyl- 5H-thiazol[3,2-a]pyrimidin-5-one (ritanserin) had no effect on SKF99101H-induced hyperactivity, suggesting that these receptors are not involved in the mediation of SKF99101H-induced hyperactivity. SKF99101H-induced hyperactivity was significantly attenuated by the D(1) dopamine receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (0.005-025 mg/kg), but not by the D(2) dopamine receptor antagonist raclopride (0.25-1.0 mg/kg), possibly suggesting the selective involvement of D(1) dopaminergic receptors in the mediation of the stimulant actions of the 5-HT(1B/D) agonist.

Effect of 5-HT(1B) receptor ligands on self-administration of ethanol in an operant procedure in rats.

Recent evidence suggests that 5-HT(1B) receptor activation modifies ethanol's reinforcing, intoxicating and discriminative stimulus effects. The present study further explored the role played by 5-HT(1A/1B) receptors by examining their influence on oral ethanol self-administration. Male Wistar rats were trained on an FR 4 schedule to obtain a reinforcer of 0.1 12% w/v ethanol solution. Once responding was stable, the effect of the 5-HT(1A/1B) agonist RU24969 alone and in combination with the 5-HT(1B) antagonist GR127935 or the 5-HT(1A) antagonists (+) WAY100135 and (+) WAY100635 was assessed. The effect of RU24969 on ethanol's pharmacokinetic profile and on operant oral saline self-administration was also examined to assess if alterations in oral ethanol self-administration were due to nonspecific effects on level pressing. For comparison, we examined the effect of another 5-HT(1A/1B) agonist, CGS12066B, on oral ethanol self-administration. Both RU24969 (0.1 to 1 mg/kg) and CGS12066B (0.1 to 1 mg/kg) significantly suppressed oral ethanol self-administration. Administration of GR127935 (1 mg/kg), significantly reversed the effects elicited by RU24969, whereas neither WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) nor (+)WAY100135 (1 mg/kg) had any effect. The effects of lower doses of RU24969 on oral ethanol self-administration were selective as oral saline self-administration and blood ethanol levels were not altered by these doses. These data demonstrate that 5-HT(1B) receptor activation suppresses oral ethanol self-administration. These studies provide further evidence that 5-HT(1B) receptors play a modulatory role in ethanol's behavioral effects.

Comparison of dopamine receptor antagonists on hyperlocomotion induced by cocaine, amphetamine, MK-801 and the dopamine D1 agonist C-APB in mice.

RATIONALE: Direct or indirect stimulation of dopamine receptors increases locomotor activity in mice. Determining the role played by D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the mediation of this activity can be difficult due to the wide variety of experimental paradigms used to investigate these phenomena. OBJECTIVES: This study set out to compare the role of selective antagonism of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors on the hyperactivity induced by a range of stimulants. METHODS: Mice were habituated to perspex locomotor activity boxes (30 x 30 x 30 cm) and activity was measured via photobeam interrupts. RESULTS: Haloperidol and clozapine both reduced the hyperactivity induced by MK-801. Haloperidol did so only at a dose that also decreased spontaneous activity (0.1 mg/kg), whereas clozapine reduced MK-801-induced hyperactivity at a dose that had no effect on spontaneous activity (1.25 mg/kg). The D1 antagonist SCH23390 (0.01 mg/kg) reduced hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg), cocaine (10 mg/kg) and C-APB (1.0 mg/kg) at doses that did not consistently alter spontaneous activity, whereas the selective D2 antagonist raclopride only attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine, cocaine and C-APB at doses in excess of the minimum dose required to attenuate spontaneous locomotor activity significantly. The latency to peak levels of hyperlocomotion induced by MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) was delayed by SCH23390 (0.1 mg/kg) but peak levels of activity were not reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that selective blockade of D1 receptors suppresses amphetamine and cocaine-induced hyperactivity in mice but not MK-801-induced locomotor activity.

A single pretreatment with MK-801 or cocaine enhances their locomotor stimulant effects in rats.

A single dose of MK-801 (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) induces an enhanced locomotor response to a subsequent lower dose of MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) administered 4, 7 or 14 days later in young adult rats (>90 days). MK-801 (1.0 mg/kg) administration did not significantly enhance the effects of cocaine (10, 20 mg/kg) administered 7 days later. Cocaine (20 mg/kg) enhanced the effect of a subsequent dose of 10 mg/kg cocaine, but did not significantly alter the response to a higher dose cocaine (20 mg/kg) or of MK-801 (0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg) again given 7 days later. MK-801 (1.0 mg/kg) did not significantly enhance the locomotor response to a second dose of MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg) in 28-day-old rats tested 7 days after the initial dose, but did enhance the effects of a lower (0.1 mg/kg) dose. These findings indicate that even a single dose of a stimulant such as MK-801 and cocaine can induce enduring changes in sensitivity to subsequent doses of the same stimulants in young adult rats. The lack of significant effects seen in cross-sensitization studies suggests that separate mechanisms maybe involved in the sensitization to cocaine and MK-801. The more pronounced enhancement of activity in the older animals is in accord with previous findings that sensitization processes are developmentally regulated.

5-HT2 receptor antagonism reduces hyperactivity induced by amphetamine, cocaine, and MK-801 but not D1 agonist C-APB.

The hyperlocomotion induced by the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg SC) in mice was attenuated by the nonselective 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin (0.12 and 0.25 mg/kg SC) and by the 5-HT2A selective antagonist MDL100907 (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg SC). SB242084 (0.25-1.0 mg/kg), a selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist, had no effect on MK-801-induced hyperactivity. These same doses of ritanserin and MDL100907 reduced the hyperactivity induced by cocaine (10 mg/ kg). Amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg SC) induced hyperlocomotion that was also attenuated by ritanserin (0.064).25 mg/kg SC). The hyperlocomotion induced by the D1 agonist C-APB (1.0 mg/kg) is not altered by pretreatment with ritanserin or MDL100907. This suggests that compounds that increase locomotor activity via indirectly increasing dopaminergic activity (either by increased release or blockade of reuptake) require the activation of a 5-HT2A receptor. Activity of compounds that act directly at the postsynaptic dopamine receptors such as C-APB is not dependent on such a mechanism. This suggests a selective involvement of 5-HT2A receptors but not 5-HT2c receptors in the mediation of the behavioral effects of compounds that increase synaptic concentration of dopamine but not directly acting agonists. This implies that the 5-HT2A receptors modulate elevation of extracellular dopamine, not the postsynaptic sensitivity of dopamine neurons.

GR46611 potentiates 5-HT1A receptor-mediated locomotor activity in the guinea pig.

5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonists such as GR46611 (3-[3-(2-Dimethylaminoethyl)-H-indol-5-yl]-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)acrylamide ) are known to lower body temperature in guinea pigs. Although stimulation of their functional analogs in rats, the 5-HT1B receptor induces hyperlocomotion, this effect has yet to be demonstrated with 5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonists in the guinea pig. Previous studies have shown that 5-HT1A agonists increase locomotor activity in guinea pigs. The current study set out to examine the effects of 5-HT(1B/D) receptor stimulation on locomotor activity in the guinea pig and to examine the interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT(1B/D) receptor stimulation on locomotor activity in that species. The full agonist at 5-HT1A receptors, 8-OH-DPAT (R(+)-8-Hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin HBr) dose-dependently increased locomotor activity in guinea pigs (0.3-1.25 mg kg(-1) s.c.), as to a lesser extent, did the partial agonist, buspirone (8-[4-[4-(2-Pyramidinyl)-1-piperazinyl]butyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5 ]decane-7,9-dione HCl) (5.0-20.0 mg kg(-1) s.c.). The 5-HT(1B/D) receptor agonist GR46611 had no effect on locomotor activity in guinea pigs at doses up to 40 mg kg(-1) s.c. 8-OH-DPAT-induced behavioural activation was reversed by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 (N-[-2-[4-(-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(pyrinidyl) cyclo hexanocarboxamide trihydro-chloride), with a minimum effective dose of 0.006 mg kg(-1), but not by the 5-HT(1B/D) receptor antagonist GR127935 (2'-methyl-4-(5-methyl-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-biphenyl-4-carboxyli c acid [4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-piperazin-1-yl)phenyl]-amide) (0.25-1.0 mg kg(-1)). GR46611, at doses that were without effect given alone (0.5-2.5 mg kg(-1)), significantly enhanced the locomotor response to subthreshold doses of 8-OH-DPAT (0.5 mg kg(-1)) and buspirone (10 mg kg(-1)). The effect of GR46611 on 8-OH-DPAT-induced hyperactivity was reversed by pretreatment with GR127935 and with WAY 100635 indicating that activation of both receptors was required for the expression of locomotor hyperactivity. These findings suggest that activation of 5-HT(1B/D) receptors alone may not stimulate locomotor activity but it does potentiate the locomotion induced by 5-HT1A receptor stimulation in guinea pigs.

Effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine2 receptor antagonism on the behavioral activation and immediate early gene expression induced by dizocilpine.

The noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists dizocilpine and phencyclidine cause behavioral changes in animals that can be blocked by antipsychotic agents, implicating NMDA receptors in the expression of schizophrenic symptoms. In the present study, we examined the effects of dizocilpine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) on locomotor activity and on the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 immediate-early genes (IEGs) in mice. Results indicate that dizocilpine increases locomotor activity and selectively increases the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 in the posterior cingulate cortex. Haloperidol (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (0.6-1.25 mg/kg) block both the locomotor response and the increased IEG immunoreactivity induced by dizocilpine (0.6 mg/kg). The 5-HT2 antagonists ritanserin (0.06-0.25 mg/kg), ketanserin (0.03-0.12 mg/kg) and amesergide (0. 3-1.25 mg/kg) also significantly attenuated the locomotor response to dizocilpine. Haloperidol and clozapine suppressed the head weaving induced by dizocilpine, but ritanserin, as previously reported did not. Although some attenuation of the c-fos and hsp-70 immunoreactivity was seen with the 5-HT2 antagonists it was less pronounced than that induced by haloperidol or clozapine. In conclusion, 5-HT2 antagonists as well as antipsychotic compounds attenuate the locomotor response to dizocilpine in mice. Haloperidol and clozapine appear to be more effective, however, in attenuating the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 in the posterior cingulate gyrus than 5-HT2 antagonists ritanserin, ketanserin or amesergide. We thus have seen a dissociation in the capacity of compounds to alter the effects on behavior and IEG expression after dizocilpine administration.

Comparison of effects of a range of 5-HT receptor modulators on consumption and preference for a sweetened ethanol solution in rats.

This study assessed the effects of a range of serotonergic agents on preference for a slightly sweetened ethanol solution (10% ethanol, 3% glucose) in rats. A two-bottle, free-choice paradigm was used following induction of ethanol consumption. The model used provides a robust and reliable level of ethanol self-administration in normal laboratory rats. Ethanol consumption was significantly and selectively reduced by the 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) full agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) and the 5-HT3 antagonist granisetron (0.1-1.0 mg/kg). Non-specific reductions in fluid consumption were induced by the 5-HT1B agonist RU 24969 (0.1-1.0mg/kg) and the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin (1.0-6.0 mg/kg). These studies thus confirm the potential for decreasing ethanol consumption and ethanol preference of 5-HT1A agonists and 5-HT3 antagonists, but failed to find any selective effects for agents acting at 5-HT1B or 5-HT2 receptors.

RU24969-induced behavioural syndrome requires activation of both 5HT1A and 5HT1B receptors.

The behavioural profiles of the mixed 5HT(1A/B) agonist RU24969 and the more selective 5HT1B agonist anpirtoline were compared. Both compounds induce an increase in activity as measured in photocell activity cages. The behaviours displayed by the rats receiving each treatment differed markedly, with RU24969 inducing flat body posture and circling of the cage perimeter (1.25-10 mg/kg S.C.), whereas anpirtoline increased ambulation characterised by a hopping motion (1.25-5.0 mg/kg S.C.). The effects of RU24969 were attenuated by both the 5HT1A antagonist WAY100635 (0.03 1.25 mg/kg S.C.) and the 5HT(1B/D) antagonist GR127935 (1.0-5.0 mg/kg S.C.). Anpirtoline-induced behaviour was attenuated by GR127935 across the same dose range but was largely unaffected by WAY100635 even at doses above those which had blocked the effects of RU24969. Coadministration of the selective 5HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.03-1.25 mg/kg S.C.) with anpirtoline (2.5 mg/kg) induced a dramatic increase in locomotor activity and a behavioural syndrome identical to that produced by RU24969. Thus it would appear that a synergistic effect of stimulation of both 5HT1A and 5HT1B receptors underlies the behavioural effects of RU24969, while anpirtoline acts mainly via stimulation of 5HT1B receptors only.

Effects of a range of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on ethanol intake in the rat.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of a range of dopaminergic agents on consumption of an ethanol solution (10% ethanol, 3% glucose) in rats. A two-bottle, free-choice paradigm was used following induction of ethanol consumption and preference in standard laboratory rats. The model used provides a robust and reliable level of ethanol oral administration in normal laboratory rats. Both ethanol intake and preference were reduced by a dopamine D1 receptor partial agonist, SFK 38393 ((+/-)-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride), in a dose-dependent manner. The dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT ((+/-)-7-hydroxy-N,N-(di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin)) at the lowest dose of 0.01 mg/kg increased both ethanol intake and preference. At higher doses (0.03-0.1 mg/kg) no significant effects were found. The dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (R-(+)-7-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine-8- ol), dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist raclopride and 5-HT2/D2 receptor antagonist risperidone did not affect ethanol consumption, although all at high doses induced a significant decrease in water intake, indicating a non-specific decrease in consummatory behavior with these compounds. These results suggest the involvement of the dopaminergic system in ethanol intake and ethanol reinforcement with dopamine D1 and D2/D3 receptors playing opposing roles. Blockade of dopamine D2 receptors had no selective effect on ethanol consumption and ethanol preference.

GR 127935 blocks the locomotor and antidepressant-like effects of RU 24969 and the action of antidepressants in the mouse tail suspension test.

The 5-HT1A/B agonist RU 24969 induces hyperactivity in rodents and also shows antidepressant-like effects in some animal models of depression. We have examined the effects of selective antagonists at 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/D receptors (WAY 100135 and GR 127935, respectively) on both the hyperlocomotor and anti-immobility effects of RU 24969. While a high dose of WAY 100135 (10 mg/kg) had no effect in either paradigm, GR 127935 attenuated the behavioural effects of RU 24969 in both. WAY 100135 was also without effect on the antidepressant effect of paroxetine, while GR 127935 blocked the effects of paroxetine (1 mg/kg) and imipramine (10 mg/kg). Furthermore, while coadministration of paroxetine or imipramine enhanced the effects of RU 24969 in the mouse tail suspension test, imipramine had no effect on the locomotor activating effects of the 5-HT1B agonist, suggesting different neural substrates may underly the effects in the different tests. These studies indicate a role for the 5-HT1B/D receptor in the mediation of the effects of antidepressant treatment.

Mecamylamine reverses physostigmine-induced attenuation of scopolamine-induced hyperactivity.

It has previously been demonstrated that the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine induces hyperactivity in rodents, which is reversed by physostigmine but not by directly acting agonists such as pilocarpine. This may suggest that non-muscarinic actions of physostigmine may be responsible for its reversal of scopolamine-induced hyperactivity. We have found, in male Wistar rats, whose activity was measured on electromagnetic detector plates, that the central nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine (3 mg/kg) reverses the blockade of scopolamine-induced behavioural activation induced by physostigmine. This suggests that activation of nicotinic receptors can counteract the effects of muscarinic blockade. Interestingly, however, treatment with nicotine does not block scopolamine-induced hyperactivity, suggesting that the exogenous and endogenous ligands may have different receptor or neuronal substrates.

Hypolocomotion induced by peripheral or central injection of CCK in the mouse is blocked by the CCKA receptor antagonist devazepide but not by the CCKB receptor antagonist L-365,260.

The pharmacological mechanisms underlying the hypolocomotion induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections of cholecystokinin octapeptide sulphated (CCK) in the mouse were examined using selective CCKA and CCKB receptor antagonists. Locomotor activity was measured in photocell cages. CCK (10 micrograms/kg i.p.) significantly reduced activity in mice tested in the afternoon but not in the morning, indicating a circadian variation in the effect of the peptide. The hypolocomotion induced by i.p. injection of 10 micrograms/kg CCK and i.c.v. injection of 3.5 micrograms CCK was reversed by the selective CCKA antagonist devazepide, but not by the selective CCKB antagonist L-365,260. This suggests that CCK-induced hypolocomotion is mediated by CCKA receptors. Larger doses of CCK were required to induce hypolomotion when injected i.c.v. (3.5 micrograms per mouse) than when given i.p. (10 micrograms/kg i.e. 0.2 microgram per mouse). Furthermore the latency to onset of the hypolocomotion after i.c.v. injection of CCK was longer than after i.p. injection of CCK. These data suggest that the sedative action of i.c.v. CCK may be due to leakage of the peptide from the brain and subsequent activation of peripheral CCKA receptors. However a role for CCKA receptors in the CNS in mediating hypolocomotion induced by i.c.v. injection of CCK cannot be ruled out on the basis of the present data.

Evidence for an involvement of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in mediating nicotine-induced hyperactivity in rats.

Previous studies have suggested that repeated exposure of rats to the drug or to the experimental environment is necessary to observe nicotine-induced locomotor stimulation. In the present study the role of habituation to the experimental environment on the stimulant effect of nicotine in rats was examined. In addition, the role of dopamine receptors in mediating nicotine-induced locomotor stimulation was investigated by examining the effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists on activity induced by nicotine. Locomotor activity was assessed in male Sprague-Dawley rats tested in photocell cages. Nicotine (1.0 mg/kg) caused a significant increase in locomotor activity in rats that were habituated to the test environment, but had only a weak and delayed stimulant action in rats that were unfamiliar with the test environment. The stimulant action of nicotine was blocked by the central nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine but not by the peripheral nicotinic blocker hexamethonium, indicating that the response is probably mediated by central nicotinic receptors. Nicotine-induced hyperactivity was blocked by the selective D1 antagonist SCH 23390, the selective D2 antagonist raclopride and the D1/D2 antagonist fluphenazine. Pretreatment with the D2 agonist PHNO enhanced nicotine-induced hyperactivity, whereas the D1 agonist SKF 38393 had no effect. The results indicate that acute nicotine injection induces a pronounced hyperactivity in rats habituated to the test environment. The effect appears to be mediated by central nicotine receptors, possibly located on dopaminergic neurons, and also requires the activation of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors.

The cholecystokinin receptor antagonist devazepide enhances morphine-induced analgesia but not morphine-induced respiratory depression in the squirrel monkey.

The effects of the cholecystokinin antagonist devazepide on analgesia and respiratory depression induced by morphine in squirrel monkeys were examined. Pain thresholds were determined using the tail withdrawal procedure, in which monkeys restrained in chairs kept their tails in cool (35 degrees C) water for at least 20 sec, but withdrew them from warm (55 degrees C) water in less than 4 sec. Morphine produced a dose-related increase in tail withdrawal latencies from warm water. Devazepide (injected i.p. or p.o.) had no effect on tail withdrawal latencies when given alone but enhanced the analgesic effects of morphine. The devazepide dose-response curve for morphine enhancement was bell-shaped with doses of 3, 10, 30 and 100 micrograms/kg injected i.p. increasing morphine analgesia whereas higher and lower dose did not. In a separate group of monkeys, morphine produced dose-dependent decreases in respiratory rate and oxygen tension and increases in carbon dioxide tension. In contrast to its effects on morphine analgesia, devazepide had no effect on the various indices of morphine-induced respiratory depression. These data suggest that devazepide may have therapeutic utility as an adjuvant to morphine analgesia allowing lower dose of the opiate to be used to relieve pain and reducing the risk of opiate-induced respiratory depression.