Interpersonal violence experienced by people with communication disabilities in Iraq: Sustainable Development Goals 16 and 5.

PURPOSE: This paper presents an analysis of interpersonal identity-based violence experienced by persons with communication disabilities in Iraq and the barriers reported to accessing supports. The use of communication accessible data collection tools is discussed as a means of enabling an inclusive response for multiple marginalised groups in relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 16 and 5. RESULT: People with communication disabilities reported similar levels of interpersonal violence to those with disabilities of other types, characterised by high rates of deprivation and physical violence. Many participants did not seek support, but those that did were most likely to speak to a family member or friend, followed by consulting legal services. Barriers to accessing support were varied, with lack of transport being the most commonly reported. Satisfaction with research communication supports was high for all participants, including those with no communication difficulties, suggesting that the resources invested in communication access have benefits beyond those with communication disabilities. CONCLUSION: Iraqi persons with communication disabilities, like those with other disabilities, face high levels of interpersonal violence. The use of communication supports in research addressing disability is likely to increase the representation of persons with communication disability in study samples and can benefit participants with other disabilities. This commentary paper, available in Arabic as a supplemental file, focusses on SDG 16 and also addresses SDG 5.

Communicating accessible messages for food insecure communities in Northern Mozambique: Supporting Sustainable Development Goal 2.

PURPOSE: This paper describes a collaborative project between Trinity College Dublin in Ireland and the United Nations' World Food Programme (WFP) Mozambique country office. The Sphere standards require that information on humanitarian assistance should be in languages and formats accessible to people who cannot read or who have communication difficulties. Nevertheless, there remains a gap in both implementing this guidance consistently and in understanding the impact of doing so when engaging with affected populations. METHOD: This commentary describes the process of developing key messages regarding targeting of humanitarian food assistance in communication-accessible formats, and field testing of these materials with community committees and partners. RESULT: The communication-accessible materials were well received by communities, and humanitarian staff and partners found them to be useful in community engagement. CONCLUSION: Materials designed to be maximally accessible to people with communication differences and disabilities may also address inclusion for affected populations with different education, literacy, and language backgrounds. This commentary focuses on Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 as an exemplar of the use of communication accessible messaging in humanitarian response.

Disability Data Collection in a Complex Humanitarian Organisation: Lessons from a Realist Evaluation.

In recent years, global attention to disability inclusion in humanitarian and development contexts, notably comprising disability inclusion within the Sustainable Development Goals, has significantly increased. As a result, UN agencies and programmes are increasingly seeking to understand and increase the extent to which persons with disabilities are accounted for and included in their efforts to provide life-saving assistance. To explore the effects and effectiveness of such measurement, this paper applies a complexity-informed, realist evaluation methodology to a case study of a single measurement intervention. This intervention, 'A9', was the first indicator designed to measure the number of persons with disabilities assisted annually by the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP). Realist logic of analysis combined with complexity theory was employed to generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOC's) against which primary interviews and secondary data were analysed. We show that within the complexity of the WFP system, the roll-out of the A9 measurement intervention generated delayed, counter-intuitive and unanticipated effects. In turn, path dependency and emergent behaviours meant that the intervention mechanisms of yesterday were destined to become the implementation context of tomorrow. These findings challenge the current reliance on quantitative data within humanitarian-development disability inclusion efforts and contribute to our understanding of how data can best be leveraged to support inclusion in such contexts.