What adults with ADHD want to know: A Delphi consensus study on the psychoeducational needs of experts by experience.

INTRODUCTION: A lack of knowledge about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can contribute to feelings of distress and difficulty in seeking and accepting an ADHD diagnosis. The present study uses a Delphi consensus design to investigate the psychoeducational needs of adults with ADHD and the information about ADHD they would like included in digital health interventions for adults with ADHD. Inclusion of perspectives of service users in developing such interventions ensures that they are evidence based and addresses the risks of engagement barriers. METHODS: The expert panel consisted of 43 adults with ADHD (age range: 23-67 years). Panel members were asked to rate the importance of the proposed topics and provide additional suggestions. Suggested topics and topics that did not achieve consensus were included for ranking in the second round. RESULTS: Interquartile ratings were used to determine consensus. A high consensus was achieved in both rounds, with an agreement on 94% of topics in the first round and 98% in the second round. Most topics were rated as important or essential. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlighted that adults with ADHD want to learn about many different aspects of ADHD and the importance of considering their perspectives when developing psychosocial interventions. Findings can be applied when creating psychoeducational content for adult ADHD. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Adults with ADHD were recruited to the Delphi panel to use an experts-by-experience approach. In doing so, we are engaging service users in the development of a psychoeducational smartphone app. The evaluation of the app will involve interviews with app users. Additionally, the present study was developed and conducted with ADHD Ireland, a charity based in Ireland that advocates for people with ADHD.

Capnocytophaga canimorsus meningitis and bacteraemia without a dog bite in an immunocompetent individual.

We describe the case of an immunocompetent 75-year-old man with Capnocytophaga canimorsus bacteraemia and meningitis. C. canimorsus is commonly found in the oral flora of dogs with human infection typically occurring following a bite. Unusually, while our patient was a dog owner, there was no history of bite nor scratch mark. Admission blood cultures flagged positive for Gram-negative bacilli, but prolonged molecular analysis was required before C. canimorsus was isolated in blood and cerebrospinal fluid. There is a high mortality rate in invasive infection, and in our patient's case, antibiotic therapy was commenced prior to laboratory confirmation with our patient making a complete recovery. This case highlights the importance of including C. canimorsus in the differential diagnosis of unwell patients who keep dogs, even without a bite. This case occurred amid heightened awareness of COVID-19, which may represent predisposition for zoonoses during social isolation and increased human-pet contact.

The diagnostic yield of transthoracic echocardiography in the intensive care unit: A retrospective observational analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a commonly requested ICU investigation. Despite this, limited data exist regarding the diagnostic yield of unselected TTEs in a heterogenous ICU population. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study was performed. All ICU patients admitted from January 2018 to February 2019 were included. AIMS: The primary aim was to define the indications for, and diagnostic yield of, TTEs performed in the ICU. We also investigated the association between major abnormalities identified on TTE and mortality. RESULTS: There were 358 patients admitted to the ICU during the study period. Of these patients, 115 (32%) had a TTE performed during their ICU stay. The primary indication was to assess left ventricular function. Just under two-thirds of TTEs (65%) were normal or had minor abnormalities. Compared to the rest of the ICU population in our study (including both patients without a TTE performed and patients with a normal TTE), patients with an abnormal TTE had higher ICU (35.9% vs 21.3%, Odds Ratio [OR], 2.06; 95% CI, 1.02-4.19, P = .04) and in-hospital (43.6% vs 30.3%, OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.33-5.25, P = .01) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A formal TTE was performed in one-third of patients during their ICU admission. Major abnormalities were identified in over one-third of these TTEs. ICU and in-hospital mortality were higher in patients with an abnormal TTE.

Genomic profiling of intestinal T-cell receptor repertoires in inflammatory bowel disease.

Growing evidence shows that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) results from dysregulation of immune responses to gut microbes. T-cell receptors (TCRs) expressed on the T-cell surface play critical roles in discriminating pathogens from commensal intestinal microorganisms at the front line of the adaptive immune system. The breakdown of this interaction may trigger persistent inflammatory responses to gut bacteria, resulting in IBD. Taking advantage of high-throughput sequencing, we developed an integrated approach to dissect the intestinal TCR repertoires underlying IBD by collecting peripheral blood and inflamed intestine from the same set of 11 IBD cases. The intestinal TCR repertoires show lower clonotype diversity (p < 0.05) and stronger clonal expansion (p < 0.02) than those in the blood. This pattern becomes more profound in TCRs unique to the inflamed tissue compared with shared TCRs. Our approach further identified the increased usage of TRAV12-3 (false discovery rate, FDR < 5%), which biases its choices of J genes towards the reduction of TRAJ37 and TRAJ43 usage (FDR < 20%) in the inflamed intestine. Our genomic profiling suggests that this selective bias of V and J gene usage may lead to a loss of diversity in the intestinal TCR repertoires and result in mucosal inflammation in IBD.

Postoperative Outcomes and Patient's Satisfaction after Hybrid TIPP with UHS and TEP Repair for Inguinal Hernias: A Single-Centre Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background: Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) and Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repairs are largely acclaimed for their lower risk of chronic postoperative pain and acceptable recurrence rates. However, hybrid/combined open procedures are still a reliable option among surgeons. Our aim is to compare the outcomes and patients satisfaction of hybrid TIPP (hTIPP) procedure using the Ultrapro Hernia System with laparoscopic pre-peritoneal mesh repair approaches (TEP) to assess its safety and effectiveness. Patients and Methods: The study design is a single center, retrospective comparative study on 90 patients who had hTIPP and TEP inguinal hernia repair in the NAAS General Hospital, over a four-year period (2013-2017). Results: Unplanned postoperative hospital admission was comparable both groups, the figures were 3 patients for hTIPP and 3 patients for TEP. There was no statistically significant difference in the immediate, early and late postoperative pain and complications in both groups. The recurrence rate was nil in hTIPP group compared to one recurrent case in TEP. There is no statistical difference in the five outcomes of the PROM questionnaire and satisfaction rate between hTIPP and TEP. Conclusions: There is no significant difference between hTIPP and TEP in terms of postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction. hTIPP approach is a safe and feasible alternative to TEP.

Curriculum Development Discourse and Practice.

Curricula in higher education is under increasing pressure to contribute to economic and societal enhancement. Educators are the primary source of curricula development and thus most centrally placed to help deliver on these significant requirements for higher education. Given their central role, the aim of this research was to elucidate the voice of educators with regard to their experience of curriculum development practice and discourse, in the context of higher education. The key objectives in realising this aim was to engage educators in curriculum development discourse; illuminate their philosophical beliefs and influence on curriculum development; irradiate current curriculum development practice; and contribute to capacity building among educators in relation to their role in curriculum development. The study was conducted across four higher education institutions in Ireland, and is part of wider piece of research which formed my Ed.D. Discourse analysis was used as a methodology within a post-structural theoretical framework which facilitated layered analysis and questioning of curriculum development practice and discourse. The findings contribute to the current curriculum development conversation by offering a framework for curriculum development practice and discourse. I argue if this framework is used as an early discourse and planning tool it can offer transformative potential for curricula.