Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 30(1): 85-92, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20220211

ABSTRACT

Some 40 years ago, in May 1970, the Radiological Protection Bill was passed by the parliament of the United Kingdom. This legislation created the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). It lasted 35 years until absorbed by the Health Protection Agency in 2005. During that period, the NRPB discharged its basic duty of protecting the people from radiation hazards.


Subject(s)
Government Agencies/history , Radiation Protection/history , England , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Radiation Monitoring/history
2.
BMJ ; 305(6851): 475, 1992 Aug 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1392973
3.
Sci Total Environ ; 45: 565-77, 1985 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4081760

ABSTRACT

The recent recommendation for limiting the exposure of the public to natural sources of radiation is one of the more important statements of principle by the International Commission on Radiological Protection in recent years. The evolution of the recommendations is traced, the exposition of the recommendations is reviewed, and the execution of the recommendations is explored.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure , Radiation Protection , Radiation , Costs and Cost Analysis , Gamma Rays , Housing , Humans , Microclimate , Radiation Protection/economics , Radon
4.
Sci Total Environ ; 45: 657-76, 1985 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4081771

ABSTRACT

Surveys of natural radiation indoors permit improved estimates to be made of exposures nationally and of regional variations. In the UK, there are clear indications that individual doses from radon decay products can be more than two orders of magnitude above the national average. A reliable risk factor for lung cancer allows the risks to individuals to be determined, and some members of the public are seen to be exposed to relatively high risks. The feasibility of reducing such risks requires a knowledge of the costs and effectiveness of remedial and preventive measures. There are also social and administrative considerations. The form of standards and the means of implementating them require careful consideration. A systematic approach to these issues is discussed in this paper.


Subject(s)
Climate , Environmental Exposure , Housing/standards , Microclimate , Radiation Protection , Air/analysis , Humans , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Radon , Risk , United Kingdom
6.
Nature ; 306(5940): 225-6, 1983.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6646206
9.
Nature ; 228(5270): 420-1, 1970 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5482493
10.
J Small Anim Pract ; 11(8): 515-22, 1970 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5500460
11.
Health Phys ; 17(3): 516-8, 1969 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5798935
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...