Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Oncol ; 53(10): 1390-7, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24957552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To assess the temporal patterns of late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) radiotherapy toxicity and resolution rates in a randomised controlled trial (All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group 97-01) assessing duration of neo-adjuvant (NA) hormone therapy for localised prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Node negative patients with > 1 of: PSA > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 7, and stage T3 or more, were included. Follow-up, including toxicity assessment, was three-monthly in the early stages and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Median follow-up from the end of RT was 6.8 years. In the interval between 90 days following the end of RT and the last toxicity assessment, GI and GU toxicity (any grade) was found in 50% and 51% of 240 and 241 patients, respectively. For those who did develop toxicity, the median time from end of RT until the first development of any grade GI or GU toxicity was 1.2 years and 1.6 years, respectively, whilst median time to final resolution was 1.6 years and 2.2 years, respectively. Grade 2 (G2) or greater GI and GU toxicity occurred in 29 (12.1%) and 40 (16.6%) patients, respectively. The proportion with unresolved G2 + GI and GU toxicity was 89% and 79%, respectively, in year 1, 69% and 65% in year 2, 59% and 52% in year 3 and 27% and 32% in year 5. CONCLUSION: Long-term toxicities continue to occur many years after NA hormone therapy and RT. The rate of occurrence does not appear to reduce within the time frame during which our patients were followed. The percentage of patients suffering from G2 + toxicity at any time is however low. Resolution of these toxicities continues for the duration of the follow-up.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Tract/radiation effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoplasm Grading , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Recovery of Function , Time Factors , Triptorelin Pamoate/administration & dosage , Triptorelin Pamoate/adverse effects
2.
Radiother Oncol ; 104(1): 96-102, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22682750

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction is a common consequence of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. The addition of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation (NAD) has an indeterminate additive effect. We examined the long-term effect on erectile function (EF) of two durations (4 months: arm 1 and 8 months: arm 2) of NAD prior to radiation (RT) for patients with localised prostate cancer from the Irish Clinical Oncology Research Group (ICORG 97-01) 4- versus 8-month trial. In this study we aimed to (1) analyse the overall effect on EF of NAD in an EBRT population, (2) compare the probability of retained EF over time in an EBRT population treated with either 4 or 8 months of NAD and (3) identify any variables such as risk group and age which may have an additive detrimental effect. This analysis provides unique long term follow up data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1997 to 2001, 276 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were randomised to 4 or 8 months of NAD before RT. EF data were recorded at baseline and at each follow-up visit by physician directed questions, using a 4-point grading system. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty patients were included in the analysis of EF and were followed for a median of 80 months. One hundred and forty-one patients had EF at baseline. Neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation in addition to radiation therapy caused a significant reduction in EF. The most significant reduction in EF happens within the first year. The median time to grade 3-4 EF toxicity was 14.6 months, 17.6 months in arm 1 and 13.7 in arm 2. Freedom from late EF toxicity did not differ significantly between arms, overall or at 5 years (n=141). The cumulative probability of EF preservation at 5 years was 28% (22-34) in arm 1 and 24% (19-30) in arm 2. Age was a significant predictor of post-treatment EF. CONCLUSIONS: The first year post ADT and EBRT poses the greatest risk to sexual function and a continued decline may be expected. However, 26% of men can expect to retain sexual function at 5 years.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Penile Erection/drug effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Penile Erection/radiation effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 81(1): 35-45, 2011 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20797824

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To examine the long-term outcomes of a randomized trial comparing short (4 months; Arm 1) and long (8 months; Arm 2) neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2001, 276 patients were enrolled and the data from 261 were analyzed. The stratification risk factors were prostate-specific antigen level >20 ng/mL, Gleason score≥7, and Stage T3 or more. The intermediate-risk stratum had one factor and the high-risk stratum had two or more. Staging was done from the bone scan and computed tomography findings. The primary endpoint was biochemical failure-free survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 102 months. The overall survival, biochemical failure-free survival. and prostate cancer-specific survival did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms, overall or at 5 years. The cumulative probability of overall survival at 5 years was 90% (range, 87-92%) in Arm 1 and 83% (range, 80-86%) in Arm 2. The biochemical failure-free survival rate at 5 years was 66% (range, 62-71%) in Arm 1 and 63% (range, 58-67%) in Arm 2. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found in biochemical failure-free survival between 4 months and 8 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Flutamide/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Triptorelin Pamoate/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...