Single-session mechanical thrombectomy for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis using a dual mechanism of action device combining basket and rotational thrombectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Interventional treatments for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remain controversial after publication of the Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis (ATTRACT) study. Interventions have been shown to reduce post-thrombotic syndrome severity and improve quality of life in DVT patients, but have been accompanied by risk of major bleeding from thrombolytics. We describe thrombus removal using a novel combined basket-rotational thrombectomy device that minimizes the need for thrombolytics or repeat procedures. METHODS: The aim of this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, first-in-human study of 19 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Pounce venous thrombectomy system ≤12 months after treatment. The primary performance end point was defined as procedural success through achievement of Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) grade II lysis in treated vessels with freedom from procedural adverse events. Secondary end points included venous disease severity assessments using the Villalta scale and the Venous Clinical Severity Score, patient quality-of-life measurement using the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life questionnaire, and calf circumference measurements taken at baseline, 24 hours, and 1 month. RESULTS: The primary end point of complete or near-complete thrombus removal (Society of Interventional Radiology grade II or III) was achieved in all patients. All study device-related safety end points were met, with no major bleeding or device-related adverse events. Of the 19 patients treated, 16 (84.2%) did not receive thrombolytics during the procedure. Post-thrombotic syndrome (Villalta scale >4) was identified in 17 of 19 patients (89.5%) at baseline, 4 of 13 patients (30.8%) available for follow-up at 6 months, and 2 of 11 patients (18.2%) at 12 months. The median Venous Clinical Severity Score decreased (P < .001) from 8.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 7-10) at baseline to 4 (IQR, 2-4) at 1 month after the procedure and was similar at 6 months (2; IQR, 2-5) and 12 months (2; IQR, 1.5-3) after the procedure. The median Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality of Life questionnaire score improved (P < .001) by 39 from baseline (57; IQR, 53.5-74) to 1 month (96; IQR, 86-101) after the procedure, and remained high at 6 months (99; IQR, 75-103) and 12 months (98; IQR, 94.5-100). The median calf circumference decreased (P = .089) from 39 cm (IQR, 35-47.8 cm) at baseline to 36 cm (IQR, 32.5-40.5 cm) at 24 hours after the procedure and was 34.5 cm (IQR, 33.2-38.5 cm) at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: The Pounce device is safe and effective for removal the of thrombus in patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. Initial results demonstrate improvements in venous disease severity and patient quality of life.

Management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with distal involvement.

Endovascular treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IF DVT) can become more complex when thrombus extends below the knee. This article discusses various techniques that can be used to treat IF DVT with distal involvement.

Lessons Learned With Venous Stenting: In-flow, Outflow, and Beyond.

Venous stents are being used with increasing frequency, with a multitude of dedicated venous stents now well established or emerging onto the market. This review explores the multifaceted aspects of venous stenting. We discuss the history of venous stents, indications for their use, the imaging required before, during and after stenting, as well as some technical tips and tricks which we have found to be helpful in our own daily practice with a particular focus on iliofemoral venous stenting. Ultimately, this article seeks to enhance the understanding of venous stenting, offering insights into what we feel are best practices, challenges, and prospects for improved patient outcomes.

The Current Use of Drug-Eluting Balloons and Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Online Survey by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).

PURPOSE: To assess the current use of drug-eluting devices for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) among interventional radiologists following the controversy caused by the 2018 meta-analysis suggesting an increased mortality risk for paclitaxel-eluting devices. METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent to 7035 CIRSE members via email; only complete responses were included and statistically analysed. RESULTS: Three hundred and seven members (4.4%) completed the survey. Among these, 95.8% indicated that they personally perform peripheral vascular procedures. Thirty-eight percentage of respondents did not see any change of practice since 2018, while 47% reported that the use of drug-eluting devices decreased; for 13%, the use stopped altogether, while it increased in 3% of responses. 45.6% of respondents also felt the impact of the controversy in terms of pricing, availability or directives from hospital administration. A large majority of respondents (83.7%) who perform peripheral vascular procedures consider the use of these devices as safe, 12.9% were undecided and 3.4% did not consider them as safe. Among the respondents who do not perform endovascular procedures, 77% considered these devices as safe and 23% were undecided. CONCLUSION: Although the 2018 meta-analysis had a disruptive impact on the use of drug-eluting devices in PAD, with the increasing body of evidence available, a majority of respondents continue to believe in the safety of these devices for use in femoropopliteal disease.

Acute and chronic venous occlusion.

This review article provides an overview of acute and chronic venous occlusion, a condition that can cause significant morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated promptly. The article begins with an introduction to the anatomy of the venous system, followed by a discussion of the causes and clinical features of venous occlusion. The diagnostic tools available for the assessment of venous occlusion, including imaging modalities such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI, are then discussed, along with their respective advantages and limitations. The article also covers the treatment options for acute and chronic venous occlusion, including anticoagulant therapy and endovascular interventions. This review aims to provide radiologists with an updated understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of acute and chronic venous occlusion.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Arterial Access for Interventions.

This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is aimed at healthcare professionals (including interventional radiologists) performing endovascular procedures to provide best practices for performing arterial access for interventions. It has been developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. This paper encompasses up-to-date clinical and technical aspects in performing safe and appropriate arterial access for interventions.

Antithrombotic Therapy After Venous Interventions: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Interventions for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disorders have increased with technical advances and more trained venous specialists. Antithrombotic therapy is essential to clinical and procedural success; however, postprocedural therapeutic regimens exhibit significant heterogeneity due to limited prospective randomized data and incomplete mechanistic understanding of the critical factors driving long-term patency. Postinterventional antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic venous disorders should adhere to existing venous thromboembolism management guidelines, which include 3-6 months of therapeutic anticoagulation at minimum and consideration of extended therapy in patients with higher risk of thrombosis because of procedural or patient factors. The added benefit of antiplatelet agents in the acute and intermediate period is unknown, having shown improved long-term stent patency in some retrospective studies. Dual- and/or triple-agent therapy should be limited based on individual risks of thrombosis and bleeding. The treatment of nonthrombotic disorders is more heterogeneous, though patients with limited flow, extensive stent material, or underlying prothrombotic states such as malignancy or chronic inflammation may benefit from single-agent or multiagent antithrombotic therapy. However, the agent, dose, and duration of therapy remain indeterminate. Future prospective studies are warranted to improve patient risk stratification and standardize postprocedural anti-thrombotic therapy in patients receiving venous interventions.

Endovascular Management of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in the Oncologic Patient Population.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Venous thromboembolic disease causes significant mortality and morbidity in the oncologic patient population. Recently, minimally invasive endovascular technologies have been developed as an adjunct to antithrombotic therapy for the management of DVT and PE. The current and potential roles for endovascular treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be reviewed in this article. RECENT FINDINGS: The recent NCCN guidelines recommend endovascular therapy in patients eligible for therapeutic anticoagulation who present with life-, organ-, or limb-threatening thrombosis. However, symptomatic non-life-threatening VTE can negatively affect QOL and physical function, both of which have prognostic implications in the cancer population. Endovascular therapies have been shown to improve physical function and QOL in prospective trials performed in a non-oncologic patient population as well as small retrospective studies in the cancer population. In addition to treating life- and limb-threatening thrombosis, endovascular therapy for VTE can improve QOL and physical function in comparison to anticoagulation alone. Prospective trials are warranted to assess the benefit of endovascular therapy for quality of life-years, performance status, and overall survival in the oncologic patient population.

A review of the incidence, outcome, and management of venous stent migration.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovenous stenting has emerged during the past decade as the primary method of treating symptomatic venous outflow obstruction. A recognized complication of venous stenting is stent migration. The aim of the present systematic review was to identify the number of cases of stent migration in reported studies to recognize the risk factors that might be associated with this complication and the outcomes following migration. METHODS: A review was conducted in accordance with the MOOSE (meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology) and PRIMSA (preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis) guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Key references were searched using specified keywords. All relevant data for the primary procedure and subsequent presentation with stent migration were retrieved. The data were assessed as too low in quality to allow for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2020, 31 studies were identified, including 29 case reports and 2 case series, providing data for 54 events of venous stent migration with some data provided regarding the stent used for 47 of the events. The mean age of the 52 patients with stent migration was 50 years (range, 19-88 years) and 30 were men (57.6%). The stents for most of the reported cases were ≤60 mm in length (38 of 46; 82.6%). Only three of the reports were of stents >14 mm in diameter (3 of 47; 3.6%). None of the studies had reported migration of stents >100 mm long. In 85% of the migrated stent events, retrieval was attempted, with 65.2% via an endovascular approach. The immediate outcome was satisfactory for 100% of the reported attempts, whether by an endovascular or open surgical approach. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from our literature review suggest that the risk of migration is rare but might be underreported. Most of reported cases had occurred with shorter and smaller diameter stents. The paucity of reported data and the short-term follow-up provided suggest that more formal data collection would provide a truer reflection of the incidence. However, clear strategies to avoid migration should be followed to prevent this complication from occurring.

One Year Outcomes of the VIVO-EU Study of Treatment of Symptomatic Iliofemoral Outflow Obstruction with the Zilver Vena Venous Self-Expanding Stent.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Zilver® Vena™ Venous Stent in the treatment of patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. METHODS: Between August 2012 and January 2015, 35 patients (mean age of 45.1 ± 15.5 years; 77.1% female) with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction were treated with the Zilver Vena Venous Stent (Cook Ireland, Ltd.) as part of this prospective, single arm, multicenter study. Study assessments included procedural success, major adverse events (MAEs), freedom from occlusion and qualitative patency at 6 and 12 month post-procedure, clinical symptoms of venous insufficiency, and reintervention with the treated venous segment. RESULTS: The rate of freedom from occlusion at 6 month and 12 month was 88.2%. The rate of qualitative patency was 88.2% at 6 month and 85.2% at 12 month. Three MAEs were reported: one symptomatic pulmonary embolism and two clinically-driven reinterventions. Following stenting, clinical symptoms of venous insufficiency improved significantly from baseline at each follow-up, as measured by VDS (p < 0.0001), CEAP "C" (p ≤ 0.0001), VCSS (p < 0.0001), and CIVIQ (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Clinical results with the Zilver Vena Venous Stent were favorable through 12 month, with high patency rates, reduction of venous insufficiency symptoms, and low morbidity.

Three-Year Results from the Venovo Venous Stent Study for the Treatment of Iliac and Femoral Vein Obstruction.

PURPOSE: To assess safety and patency of the Venovo venous stent for the treatment of iliofemoral vein obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two international centers enrolled 170 patients in the VERNACULAR study (93 post-thrombotic syndrome; 77 non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions). Primary outcome measures were major adverse events at 30 days and 12-month primary patency (freedom from target vessel revascularization, thrombotic occlusion, or stenosis > 50%). Secondary outcomes included the Venous Clinical Severity Score Pain Assessment and Chronic Venous Quality-of-Life Questionnaire assessments (hypothesis tested). Secondary observations included primary patency, target vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR), and assessment of stent integrity through 36 months. RESULTS: Freedom from major adverse events through 30 days was 93.5%, statistically higher than a pre-specified performance goal of 89% (p = 0.032) while primary patency at 12 months was 88.6%, also statistically higher than a performance goal of 74% (p < 0.0001). Mean quality-of-life measures were statistically improved compared to baseline values at 12 months (p < 0.0001). Primary patency at 36 months was 84% (Kaplan-Meier analysis) while freedom from TVR/TLR was 88.1%. There was no stent embolization/migration, and no core laboratory assessed stent fractures reported through 36 months. Six deaths were reported; none adjudicated as device or procedure related. CONCLUSION: The Venovo venous stent was successfully deployed in obstructive iliofemoral vein lesions and met the pre-specified primary outcome measures through 12 months. At 3 years, primary patency was 84%, reintervention rates were low, standardized quality-of-life and pain measures improved from baseline, and there was no stent migration or fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2-prospective, multicenter, controlled clinical study without a concurrent control or randomization. Pre-specified endpoints were hypothesis-tested to performance goals derived from peer-reviewed clinical literature. REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: Unique Identifier NCT02655887.

CIRSE Clinical Practice Manual.

BACKGROUND: Interventional radiology (IR) has come a long way to a nowadays UEMS-CESMA endorsed clinical specialty. Over the last decades IR became an essential part of modern medicine, delivering minimally invasive patient-focused care. PURPOSE: To provide principles for delivering high quality of care in IR. METHODS: Systematic description of clinical skills, principles of practice, organizational standards and infrastructure needed for the provision of professional IR services. RESULTS: There are IR procedures for almost all body parts and organs, covering a broad range of medical conditions. In many cases IR procedures are the mainstay of therapy, e.g. in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. In parallel the specialty moved from the delivery of a procedure towards taking care for a patient's condition with the interventional radiologists taking ultimate responsibility for the patient's outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution from a technical specialty to a clinical specialty goes along with changing demands on how clinical care in IR is provided. The CIRSE Clinical Practice Manual provides interventional radiologist with a starting point for developing his or her IR practice as a clinician.

DEep VEin Lesion OPtimisation (DEVELOP) trial: protocol for a randomised, assessor-blinded feasibility trial of iliac vein intervention for venous leg ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Venous leg ulceration is a widespread, debilitating pathology with high recurrence rates. Conservative treatment using graduated compression dressings may be associated with unacceptable ulcer recurrence rates. Early superficial venous ablation encourages ulcer healing and reduces recurrence. However, many of this cohort display concomitant ilio-caval stenosis, which further contributes to lower limb venous hypertension and ulceration. An approach that combines early superficial venous ablation with early treatment of ilio-caval stenotic disease may significantly improve ulcer healing and recurrence rates. We question whether early iliac vein interrogation with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), stenting of significant occlusive disease plus superficial venous ablation, in patients with active venous leg ulceration, will produce superior ulcer healing to standard therapy. METHODS: This is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled, feasibility trial recruiting patients with lower limb venous ulceration and saphenous venous incompetence. Patients will be randomised to undergo either truncal ablation and compression therapy or truncal ablation, simultaneous iliac interrogation with intravascular ultrasound and stenting of significant (> 50%) iliac vein lesions plus compression therapy. The primary feasibility outcome will be the rate of eligible patient participation while the primary clinical outcomes will be ulcer healing and procedural safety. Secondary outcomes include time to healing, quality of life and clinical scores, ulcer recurrence rates and rates of post-thrombotic syndrome. Follow-up will be over a 5-year period. This feasibility trial is designed to include 60 patients. Should it be practicable a total of 594 patients would be required to adequately power the trial to definitively address ulcer-healing rates. DISCUSSION: This trial will be the first randomised trial to examine the role iliac interrogation and intervention in conjunction with standard operative therapy in the management of venous ulceration related to superficial truncal venous incompetence. ETHICAL COMMITTEE REFERENCE: C.A. 2111 Galway Clinical Research Ethics Committee REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov registration NCT03640689 , Registered on 21 August 2018.

Percutaneous thrombectomy using a novel single session device for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

A 74-year-old woman presented with acute symptomatic left thigh and calf swelling; imaging demonstrated evidence of occlusive thrombosis from the upper left common iliac vein to the mid-thigh. Single session zero-thrombolysis venous thrombectomy was performed using the ReVeneTM Thrombectomy Catheter.