Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 26(11): 851-862, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35596904

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Formation of a defunctioning loop ileostomy is common after mid and low rectal resection. Historically, they were reversed between 3 and 6 months after initial resection. Recently, earlier closure (< 14 days) has been suggested by some current randomised controlled trials. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early stoma closure on surgical and patient outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of the current randomised controlled trial literature comparing early and standard ileostomy closure after rectal surgery was performed. Specifically, we examined surgical outcomes including; morbidity, mortality and quality of life. RESULTS: Six studies met the predefined criteria and were included in our analysis. 275 patients underwent early stoma closure compared with 259 patients having standard closure. Overall morbidity was similar between both groups (25.5% vs. 21.6%) (OR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.75-2.87). However, there tended to be more reoperations (8.4 vs. 4.2%) (OR, 2.02, 95% CI 0.99-4.14) and small bowel obstructions/postoperative ileus (9.3% vs. 4.4%) (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.90) in the early closure group, but no difference across the other domains. CONCLUSIONS: Early closure appears to be a feasible in highly selective cases after good perioperative counselling and shared decision-making. Further research on quality of life outcomes and long term benefits is necessary to help define which patients are suitable candidates for early closure.


Subject(s)
Ileostomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Ileostomy/adverse effects , Ileostomy/methods , Ileus , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery
2.
Diabetes Care ; 16(4): 634-5, 1993 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8462392

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine an effective screening procedure for microalbuminuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The prevalence of microalbuminuria in NIDDM patients whose urine was negative on routine Albustix testing was studied. Microalbuminuria was measured in overnight urine samples from 128 NIDDM patients on at least two of three occasions over a 6-mo period. Patients were tested with Micro-Bumintest or Micral-Test. RESULTS: Ten of 128 patients had albumin concentrations > or = 20 mg/L on two or more occasions, 14 patients had A-C ratios > or = 3 mg/M on two or more occasions, and 9 patients had both. CONCLUSIONS: Neither Micro-Bumintest nor Micral-Test is a useful or feasible screening procedure for microalbuminuria.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/urine , Aged , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Reagent Strips
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...