Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis.

AIMS: We aimed to compare the implant survival, complications, readmissions, and mortality of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) treated with internal fixation with that of B1 PFFs treated with internal fixation and B2 fractures treated with revision arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 112 PFFs, of which 47 (42%) B1 and 27 (24%) B2 PFFs were treated with internal fixation, whereas 38 (34%) B2 fractures underwent revision arthroplasty. Decision to perform internal fixation for B2 PFFs was based on specific radiological (polished femoral components, intact bone-cement interface) and clinical criteria (low-demand patient). Median follow-up was 36.4 months (24 to 60). Implant survival and mortality over time were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (measured with a modified Dindo-Clavien classification) and 90-day readmissions were additionally compared between groups. RESULTS: In all, nine (8.01%) surgical failures were detected. All failures occurred within the first 24 months following surgery. The 24-month implant survival was 95.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 89.13 to 100) for B1 fractures treated with internal fixation, 90% (95% CI 76.86 to 100) for B2 PFFs treated with osteosynthesis-only, and 85.8% (95% CI 74.24 to 97.36) for B2 fractures treated with revision THA, without significant differences between groups (p = 0.296). Readmissions and major adverse events including mortality were overall high, but similar between groups (p > 0.05). The two-year patient survival rate was 87.1% (95% CI 77.49 to 95.76), 66.7% (95% CI 48.86 to 84.53), and 84.2% (95% CI 72.63 to 95.76), for the B1 group, B2 osteosynthesis group, and B2 revision group, respectively (p = 0.102). CONCLUSION: Implant survival in Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with internal fixation was similar to that of B1 fractures treated with the same method and to B2 PFFs treated with revision arthroplasty. Low-demand, elderly patients with B2 fractures around well-cemented polished femoral components with an intact bone-cement interface can be safely treated with internal fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1222-1230.

One-stage exchange should be avoided in periprosthetic joint infection cases with massive femoral bone loss or with history of any failed revision to treat periprosthetic joint infection.

AIMS: There is a paucity of long-term studies analyzing risk factors for failure after single-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We report the mid- to long-term septic and non-septic failure rate of single-stage revision for PJI after THA. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 88 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. Mean follow-up was seven years (1 to 14). Septic failure was diagnosed with a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any reoperation for mechanical causes in the absence of evidence of infection was considered as non-septic failure. A competing risk regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic and non-septic failures. A Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to analyze mortality. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of septic failure was 8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 15) at one year, 13.8% (95% CI 7.6 to 22) at two years, and 19.7% (95% CI 12 to 28.6) at five and ten years of follow-up. A femoral bone defect worse than Paprosky IIIA (hazard ratio (HR) 13.58 (95% CI 4.86 to 37.93); p < 0.001) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; HR 3.88 (95% CI 1.49 to 10.09); p = 0.005) were significantly associated with septic failure. Instability and periprosthetic fracture were the most common reasons for mechanical failure (5.7% and 4.5%, respectively). The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was 2% (95% CI 0.4 to 7) at two years, 9% (95% CI 4 to 17) at five years, and 12% (95% CI 5 to 22) at ten years. A previous revision to treat PJI was significantly associated with non-septic failure (HR 9.93 (95% CI 1.77 to 55.46); p = 0.009). At the five-year timepoint, 93% of the patients were alive (95% CI 84% to 96%), which fell to 86% (95% CI 75% to 92%) at ten-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Massive femoral bone loss was associated with greater chances of developing a further septic failure. All septic failures occurred within the first five years following the one-stage exchange. Surgeons should be aware of instability and periprosthetic fracture being potential causes of further aseptic revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7):1247-1253.

Patients with no recurrence of infection five years after two-stage revision hip arthroplasty may be classified as periprosthetic infection 'in remission'.

AIMS: We aimed to report the mid- to long-term rates of septic and aseptic failure after two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 96 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI. The mean follow-up was 90 months (SD 32). Septic failure was assessed using a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any further surgery undertaken for aseptic mechanical causes was considered as aseptic failure. The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict the risk of septic failure. A regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic failure. The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was also analyzed. RESULTS: There were 23 septic failures at final follow-up, with a cumulative incidence of 14% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8% to 22%) at one year, 18% (95% CI 11% to 27%) at two years, 22% (95% CI 14% to 31%) at five years, and 23% (95% CI 15% to 33%) at ten years. Having at least one positive culture (hazard ratio (HR) 2.38 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.19 to 4.74); p = 0.013), or a positive intraoperative frozen section (HR 2.55 (IQR 1.06 to 6.15); p = 0.037) was significantly associated with septic failure after reimplantation. With dislocation being the most common cause of aseptic revision (5.2%), the cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was 1% (95% CI 0% to 5%) at one year, 6% (95% CI 1% to 8%) at five years, and 8% (95%CI 3% to 17%) at ten years. CONCLUSION: If there is no recurrent infection in the five years following reimplantation, the chances of further infection thereafter are remote. While the results of a frozen section may be a reliable guide to the timing of reimplantation, intraoperative culture has, currently, only prognostic value. Surgeons should be aware that instability remains a potential indication for further revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):79-86.

4- to 8-year complication analysis of 2 'partial collum' femoral stems in primary THA.

OBJECTIVES: Compare the clinical and radiological outcome of CFP stem with the MiniHip design in a prospective series, with special interest in intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (IPPF). METHODS: We prospectively followed 101 cases treated with the MiniHip stem (Group 1) and 89 with the CFP stem (Group 2) operated between 2010 and 2014. No significant demographic differences were observed between both groups. Median follow-up was 72 months. Average stem length was 41% shorter in the MiniHip group (p < 0.001). Radiological parameters were measured and a logistcic regression model was created to evaluate factors associated with IPPF. RESULTS: Mean mHHS improved from 54 to 95 in the MiniHip group (p < 0.001) and from 64 to 98 in the CFP group (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in terms of loosening, infection or instability. We observed 7 IPPFs (3.68%), 3 in group 1 and 4 in group 2. After adjusting for confounders, CFP was not associated with a greater risk of IPPF (OR 3.23; 95% CI, 0.250-42.034, p = 0.368), however, a more complex fracture pattern was observed with this stem design. Prior acetabular fractures were associated with IPPF (OR 66.85; 95% CI, 1.142-3911, p = 0.043). Compared to Dorr A femurs, type Dorr B appeared protective against IPPF (OR 0.039; 95% CI, 0.001-1.109, p = 0.058). Valgus alignment tended to increase the risk of IPPF (OR 20.59; 95% CI 0.870-487.221, p = 0.061). CONCLUSIONS: MiniHip showed similar radiological outcomes to CFP at short- to mid-term follow-up without increasing IPPFs with a shorter stem length. Given that CFP produced a more complex IPPF pattern, surgeons should be cautious with alignment of this particular design, especially in Dorr A femur.

International Organism Profile of Periprosthetic Total Hip and Knee Infections.

BACKGROUND: There is scarce literature describing pathogens responsible for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) around the world. Therefore, we sought to describe periprosthetic joint infection causative organisms, rates of resistant organisms, and polymicrobial infections at 7 large institutions located in North/South America and Europe. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 654 periprosthetic hip (n = 361) and knee (n = 293) infections (January 2006 to October 2019) identified at Cleveland Clinic Ohio/Florida in the United States (US) (n = 159), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires in Argentina (n = 99), Hospital Asociación Española in Uruguay (n = 130), Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital in the United Kingdom (UK) (n = 103), HELIOS Klinikum in Germany (n = 59), and Vreden Institute for Orthopedics in St. Petersburg, Russia (n = 104). Analyses were performed for the entire cohort, knees, and hips. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Overall, the most frequent organisms identified were Staphylococcus aureus (24.8%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (21.7%). The incidence of organisms resistant to at least one antibiotic was 58% and there was a significant difference between hips (62.3%) and knees (52.6%) (P = .014). Rates of resistant organisms among countries were 37.7% (US), 66.7% (Argentina), 71.5% (Uruguay), 40.8% (UK), 62.7% (Germany), and 77.9% (Russia) (P < .001). The overall incidence of polymicrobial infections was 9.3% and the rates across nations were 9.4% in the US, 11.1% in Argentina, 4.6% in Uruguay, 4.9% in UK, 11.9% in Germany, and 16.3% in Russia (P = .026). CONCLUSION: In the evaluated institutions, S aureus and S epidermidis accounted for almost 50% of all infections. The US and the UK had the lowest incidence of resistant organisms while Germany and Russia had the highest. The UK and Uruguay had the lowest rates of polymicrobial infections.

Tratamiento de las fracturas femorales periprotésicas Vancouver B3 con injerto óseo impactado. Supervivencia y complicaciones / Impaction bone grafting for the treatment of Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Survivorship and complication rate analysis

Objetivos: El tratamiento de elección para las fracturas femorales periprotésicas Vancouver B3 aún no está definido. Por este motivo, nos propusimos analizar la tasa de complicaciones de la técnica de injerto óseo impactado con un vástago cementado cuando se utiliza para tratar estas fracturas. Materiales y métodos: Estudiamos retrospectivamente 33 fracturas femorales periprotésicas B3 tratadas con la técnica de injerto óseo impactado operados entre 2000 y 2016, analizando la tasa de complicaciones. La mediana de seguimiento fue de 75 meses (RIC 36-111). La mediana de edad fue de 78 años (RIC 74-83). La mediana del defecto óseo femoral fue 3 (RIC 3-3) según la clasificación de la Endo-Klinik. Se realizó un análisis de regresión múltiple para determinar los factores de riesgo asociados a complicaciones, las variables incluidas fueron: cantidad de cirugías previas, diámetro de la nueva cabeza femoral y defecto óseo femoral. Resultados: Se realizó una cirugía de revisión en dos etapas en cuatro pacientes. Se registraron cinco fallas asépticas del implante y dos luxaciones en toda la serie. El análisis de regresión lineal multivariable mostró una asociación significativa entre el grado del defecto óseo femoral Endo-Klinik y la tasa de complicaciones (p = 0,04). Conclusión: La reconstrucción femoral con la técnica de injerto óseo impactado para tratar fracturas periprotésicas Vancouver B3 provocó una alta tasa de complicaciones. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Aims: Because the gold standard for the treatment of Vancouver type B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) is yet to be defined, we sought to analyze the complication rate of the impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique with a cemented stem for the treatment of this fractures. Materials and methods: We retrospectively studied 33 B3 PFFs treated with the IBG technique oper-ated between 2000 and 2016, analyzing the complication rate. The median follow-up was 75 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36-111). The median age was 78 years (IQR, 74-83). The median grade of EndoKlinik femoral bone defect was 3 (IQR, 3-3). Weperformed a multiple regression analysis to determine risk factors for complications, including the following variables: number ofprevious surgeries, femoral head diameter, and femoral bone defect. Results: As for infection outcomes, 2-stage revision surgerywas performed in 4 patients. We registered 5 implant failures and 2 dislocations in the whole series. Multiple regression analysisshowed a significant association between the grade of EndoKlinik femoral bone defect and complication rate (P=0.04). Conclu-sion: Femoral reconstruction with the IBG technique evidenced a high complication rate for the treatment of B3 PFF. Level of Evidence: IV

¿Qué factores hacen fallar un reimplante de cadera luego de una revisión en dos tiempos? / What factors cause hip reimplantation to fail after a two-stage revision hip arthroplasty?

Introducción: El objetivo del estudio fue analizar la supervivencia sin recurrencia de infección en pacientes con reemplazo total de cadera tratados con revisión en dos tiempos, valorando el impacto del cultivo intraoperatorio y la congelación positiva en el reimplante. materiales y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 96 casos con infección periprotésica crónica, según los criterios de la MusculoSkeletal Infection Society, sometidos a los dos tiempos quirúrgicos en nuestra institución, entre 2008 y 2013. El seguimiento promedio fue 90 meses. La falla séptica se definió sobre la base de un consenso tipo Delphi modificado. La supervivencia sin falla séptica se definió sobre la base del estimador de Kaplan-Meier. Se compararon los resultados de supervivencia en función del cultivo intraoperatorio y de los estudios de anatomía patológica por congelación mediante la prueba del orden logarítmico. Resultados: La supervivencia sin falla séptica fue del 82,65% a los 2 años (IC95% 73,25-88,99%), 80,40% a los 5 años (IC95% 70,70-87,17%) y 77,32% a 6-10 años (IC95% 66,90-84,33%). Hubo significativamente más fallas en los pacientes con un cultivo positivo en el reimplante que en aquellos con un cultivo negativo (prueba del orden logarítmico, p = 0,0208), y en quienes tuvieron un estudio anatomopatológico por congelación positivo en el reimplante que en aquellos con un resultado negativo (prueba del or-den logarítmico, p = 0,0154). Conclusiones: Los reimplantes sin recurrencias infecciosas por, al menos, 6 años tuvieron un riesgo de falla séptica muy bajo. Cuando se detectó un cultivo o una congelación positivos, la falla séptica fue significativamente mayor. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Background: We analyzed the survivorship free-from-septic failure in a series of THA cases treated with a two-stage protocol at long-term follow-up, with a special focus on the relevance of positive frozen section and positive intraoperative culture taken during the reimplantation. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 96 cases who met the Musculoskeletal Infec-tion Society criteria for periprosthetic joint infection and who had undergone both stages of a two-stage protocol at our institution between 2008-2013. Mean follow-up was 90 months. Treatment failure was determined with a modified Delphi-based consensus definition. Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to determine survivorship free-from-septic failure. Log-Rank test was used to compare variables associated with septic failure. Results: Survival free-from-septic failure was 82.65% at 2 years (95%CI 73.25%-88.99%), 80.40% at 5 years (95%CI 70.70%-87.17%) and 77.32% at 6-10 years (95%CI 66.90%-84.33%). Patients with a positive culture at reimplantation had significantly more septic failures than those without it (Log-Rank test, p=0.0208), while patients with a positive frozen section at reimplantation had significantly more septic failures than those without it (Log-Rank test, p=0.0154). Conclusions: Reimplantations that remained at least 6 years without septic recurrences had a very low risk of further septic failure. Both positive frozen section and intraoperative culture at reimplantation were risk factors for septic failure. Level of Evidence: IV

Fascitis necrotizante como complicación de una osteosíntesis de fractura medial de cadera. Presentación de un caso / Necrotizing fasciitis. Complication of osteosynthesis in medial hip fracture. Case presentation

Introducción: La fascitis necrotizante es un cuadro infrecuente que provoca una alta morbimortalidad. La comunicación de esta entidad asociada a una osteosíntesis de cadera con tornillos canulados es inusual. Se describe el caso de un paciente con múltiples comorbilidades tratado por una fractura medial de cadera mediante una osteosíntesis con tornillos canulados. El paciente ingresó con un cuadro de shock séptico. Requirió cirugía de urgencia con fasciotomía amplia y limpieza quirúrgica más desbridamiento extenso de tejido necrótico. Esta presentación hace hincapié en la importancia de reconocer las principales manifestaciones de esta enfermedad. El diagnóstico es fundamentalmente clínico y requiere de una alta sospecha para instaurar un tratamiento precoz. Conclusión: A pesar de su baja frecuencia y los escasos reportes relacionados con cirugías ortopédicas, es importante tener en cuenta esta entidad como una posible complicación de la cirugía. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Introduction: Necrotizing fasciitis is an infrequent pathology with a high morbidity and mortality. The report of this entity in relation to hip osteosynthesis with cannulated screws is unusual. The aim of this study is to present a case of necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of hip surgery. A case about a patient with multiple comorbidities treated for a femoral neck fracture with osteosynthesis with cannulated screws is described. The patient was admitted to the emergency department of our hospital suffering from septic shock. He required emergency surgical treatment with a wide fasciotomy and a surgical toilet plus extensive debridement of necrotic tissue. The case report emphasizes the importance of recognizing the main manifestations of this disease. The diagnosis is fundamentally clinical and requires high suspicion to establish treatment early. Conclusion: Despite its low frequency and reporting in relation to orthopedic surgeries, it is important to consider this entity as a possible complication of surgery. Necrotizing fasciitis is characterized by its rapid and torpid evolution. Early debridement has been shown to decrease mortality and is the best treatment along with antibiotic therapy. Level of Evidence: IV

Who Restores Hip Biomechanics More Effectively after a Femoral Neck Fracture? Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed by Either Hip Surgeons or Orthopaedic Residents.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the ability to restore hip biomechanics in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures operated by either hip surgeons (HSs) or orthopaedic residents (ORs). METHODS: We retrospectively compared 95 patients treated by HSs (group A) with 110 patients treated by ORs (group B). Leg-length discrepancy, femoral offset (FO), center of rotation (COR), acetabular inclination, and acetabular anteversion were evaluated on postoperative radiographs using the healthy contralateral hip as control. RESULTS: The median leg-length discrepancy was 2 mm for both groups (P = .74). The leg length was increased in 54% of the HS group and 57% of the OR group (P = .13). The median FO difference of groups A and B were 7 mm and 5.5 mm, respectively (P = .14). FO was increased in 80% of the HS group and 69% of the OR group (P = .19). Median discrepancies of the horizontal and vertical CORs were not statistically relevant, with P-values of .69 and .14, respectively. The horizontal COR was slightly medialized in 58% of the HS group and 53% of the OR group (P = .003). The vertical COR was slightly proximal in 66% of the HS group and 76% of the OR group (P = .28). The median acetabular inclination angles of groups A and B were 41° and 40°, respectively (P = .62). The median anteversion angle was 19° for both groups (P = .89). CONCLUSIONS: The horizontal COR was the only measurement with statistical significance. To conclude, ORs under supervision are as reliable as HSs to properly restore hip biomechanics in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Is there a Role for Antibiotic Prophylaxis Prior to Dental Procedures in Patients with Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Background: The indication of prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures for non-infected causes in order to reduce the risk of haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains as controversial. We performed a systematic review of the literature assessing the relationship between PJI and invasive dental procedures and whether there is evidence to support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: This review was conducted in accordance with the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for studies focusing on dental procedures after TJA, reporting on PJI as an outcome. The methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale for case-control and cohort studies and by the tool proposed by Murad et al. for observational studies. Results: Our systematic literature review yielded 90 individual studies, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. The overall infection rate ranged from 0.26% to 2.12%. Of these, cases associated with a dental procedure ranged from 0% to 15.9%. Five of the studies described cases in which antibiotic prophylaxis was administered; however, no clear algorithm regarding type and dosage of antibiotic was mentioned. When assessing the methodological quality of the evidence, all studies had an overall low to moderate quality. Conclusion: The current systematic review, mostly composed of low-quality studies, suggests that there is no direct evidence to indicate prophylactic antibiotics prior to dental procedures in patients with TJA. In line with the current guidelines, no prophylaxis should be used on interventions for non-infected causes, except for occasional unusual situations, which can then be judged individually.

Impaction Bone Grafting or Uncemented Modular Stems for the Treatment of Type B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures? A Complication Rate Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Because the gold standard for the treatment of Vancouver type-B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) is yet to be defined, we sought to analyze the complication rate between the impaction bone grafting (IBG) technique with a cemented stem and reconstruction with an uncemented distally-fixed modular stem (DFMS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 B3 PFFs operated between 2000 and 2016, comparing the complication rate of 33 patients treated with the IBG technique (group A) with 21 patients treated with a DFMS (group B). Median follow-up of groups A and B were 75 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36-111 months) and 55 months (IQR, 32-73 months), respectively (P = .008). Median age of groups A and B were 78 years (IQR, 74-83 years) and 81 years (IQR, 74-86 years), respectively (P = .30). Median grade of Endo-Klink femoral bone defect was 3 (IQR, 3-3) for both groups (P = .11). We performed a multiple regression analysis to determine risk factors for complications including the following variables: age, initial diagnosis, and surgical technique. RESULTS: As for infection outcomes, 2-stage revision surgery was more frequent in group A than in group B (4 vs 0, P = .003). Group A presented more implant failures than group B (5 vs 1, P = .195). We found 4 dislocations in group B and 2 in group A (P = .192). Multiple regression analysis showed a significant association between surgical technique and complication rate (P = .01). The IBG technique presented an odds risk for complications of 4.77 (P = .016; IQR, 1.33-17.21). CONCLUSION: Femoral reconstruction with the IBG technique evidenced an ostensibly higher complication rate than that of DFMS for the treatment of B3 PFF.

Reemplazo total de cadera con un tallo corto no cementado tipo 2B: resultados a los 2-5 años de seguimiento / Hip replacement with a type 2B cementless short stem. Results of 2 to 5 years of follow-up

Objetivo: Determinar los resultados clínicos, la supervivencia y la incidencia de fractura periprotésica intraoperatoria con un tallo corto tipo 2B de fijación cervicometafisaria. Materiales y Métodos: Se analizaron prospectivamente los primeros 100 tallos (84 pacientes) MiniHipTM (Corin, Cirencester, Reino Unido) colocados, en forma consecutiva, por un mismo cirujano. La edad promedio fue de 47 años. La indicación para un tallo corto fue: edad <55 años (85 casos) o la participación previa en deportes de impacto en pacientes de entre 56 y 60 años (15 casos). El diagnóstico inicial fue artrosis primaria de cadera en el 82% de los casos. El seguimiento promedio fue de 42 meses. Resultados: El puntaje en la escala de Harris modificada mejoró de 55 a 96 al final del seguimiento (p = 0,02) y ningún paciente refirió dolor de muslo en el posoperatorio. La supervivencia del tallo fue del 99% (IC95% 93,1-99,8). Un caso presentó una perforación de la cortical lateral intraoperatoria, tratado con revisión con un tallo no cementado convencional. Un paciente tuvo una infección aguda, que fue tratada con desbridamiento, retención de componentes y antibióticos, con resultado favorable a los 48 meses de la cirugía. Se produjeron 3 fracturas incompletas del calcar intraoperatorias (3%). Conclusiones: Se obtuvieron resultados excelentes en esta serie de pacientes jóvenes y activos operados por un mismo cirujano con un tallo corto tipo 2B, a los 2-5 años de seguimiento, con un 1% de falla por falsa vía femoral intraoperatoria. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Objective: We aimed to determine 2- to 5-year survivorship rate, intraoperative fractures, subsidence and thigh pain rate in a consecutive, independent, one-surgeon series of surgical patients in whom a type 2B short stem was implanted. Methods: We reviewed the first 100 type 2B consecutive femoral short stems implanted in 84 patients with a mean age of 47 years old. Indications included age younger than 55 years (85 hips), or participation in impact sports in patients aging 56 to 60 years old (15 hips). Initial diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 82% of the cases. Median follow-up was 42 months. Results: Stem survivorship rate was 99% at 2 to 5 years followed by stem revision for any aseptic reason, and 98% when infection played a part. Mean Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 55 to 96 at final follow-up (p 0.02). There was one lateral cortex perforation, and three intra-operative calcar partial fractures (3%), only one of them required cerclage wiring and delayed weight-bearing. No patient referred thigh pain at final follow-up. Only one case subsided 4 mm, but then stabilized. The risk of revision was 1% after 2 to 5 years (95%CI 93.1-99.8%). Conclusions: We obtained promising short-term results with this device in this single-surgeon, non-consecutive series -including the learning curve period- using a type 2B short stem in young active patients-, in which bone preservation is warranted. Level of Evidence: IV

Aggressive granulomatosis of the hip: a forgotten mode of aseptic failure.

PURPOSE: It has been acknowledged that implant wear correlates with the risk for periprosthetic osteolysis, being aggressive granulomatosis the worst expression of bone resorption. We sought to determine the clinical, radiological, and histological features of aggressive granulomatosis after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: We included nine cases with aggressive granulomatosis of the hip around cemented stems. Indications for revision THA consisted of progressive signs of extensive bone resorption or implant loosening. Mean follow-up since revision THA was 143 months (SD ± 59.4). We analysed clinical outcomes, component loosening and gross as well as histological characteristics of the granulomatous lesions. RESULTS: Overall mean time between primary THA and revision surgery was 81 months (SD ± 20.8). All of the cases evidenced multiple ovoid tumour-like lesions around the stem with extensive bone loss. Only one case reported thigh pain before revision surgery, with radiological evidence of stem loosening; the remaining cases were asymptomatic with well-fixed implants. Gross anatomy findings revealed metallosis in the femoral canal and inside the cystic lesions. Pathology analysis showed monocyte-macrophage-dominated adverse foreign-body-type tissue reaction with fibroblastic reactive zones and granulomatous inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: We found a prevalence of 1% of this aseptic mode of implant failure. Since most of the retrieved stems were not loose, we did not find any alarming clinical symptoms anticipating implant failure. In this scenario, surgeons should be aware of the rapidly progressive nature of this entity and propose a revision THA in a timely fashion.

State-of-the-art diagnosis and surgical treatment of acute peri-prosthetic joint infection following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Acute peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a potentially devastating and undesired complication, with a prevalence of 0.3% to 2.9%. Its suspicion begins with a meticulous physical examination and anamnesis. Diagnosis should be made on the basis of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Serum and synovial biomarkers are very useful tools when major criteria are absent.Although sometimes not possible due to medical conditions, surgery is usually the first line of treatment. Although its outcome is highly correlated with the isolated microorganism, irrigation and debridement with implant retention (DAIR) is the gold standard for treatment. Ideally, the prior approach should be proximally and distally extended to augment the field of view and remove all of the prosthetic modular components, that is, femoral head and acetabular insert.Given DAIR's unclear control of infection, with successful outcomes in the range of 30% to 95%, one- or two-stage revision protocols may play a role in certain cases of acute infections; nonetheless, further prospective, randomized studies are necessary to compare long-term outcomes between DAIR and revision surgeries.Following surgical treatment, length of antibiotherapy is in the range of six weeks to six months, without any difference in outcomes between short and long protocols. Treatment should be adjusted to the isolated bacteria and controlled further with post-operative serum biomarker levels. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:434-441. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170032.

Periprosthetic stress fracture around a well-fixed type 2B short uncemented stem.

Despite the theoretical advantages of uncemented short stems, postoperative thigh pain is still matter of concern and can be attributed to different causes. We report a peculiar case of a stress fracture around a short cementless stem with cervico-metaphyseal fixation in an otherwise healthy patient. We implanted a MiniHipTM stem in a 43 year-old male professional golf player for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis using a ceramic on ceramic bearing. Against medical advice, the patient started to play soccer at the 4th postoperative month and was completely asymptomatic to that extent; but at 8 months follow-up and without a history of trauma he started complaining about progressive hip pain. After ruling out infection and loosening, histological analysis from a bone biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of stress fracture. Although revision surgery was initially scheduled, pain started to decrease gradually with protected weight-bearing (crutches) and disappeared around the first postoperative year, remaining the patient asymptomatic at 2 and half years of follow-up, with radiographs depicting a healed fracture with a hypertrophic callus. We encourage surgeons to be aware of the existence of periprosthetic stress fractures as a source of thigh pain (sometimes intractable), and despite being infrequent, they should always be contemplated, providing that these cases can be managed conservatively with rest and limited weight-bearing. After this uncommon case, we suggest to align the stem in order to equally distribute loads onto the medial calcar and the lateral femoral cortical.

Resultados a corto plazo de la prótesis invertida de hombro según la patología / Short-term results of reverse shoulder prosthesis according to pathology

Objetivo: Analizar los resultados funcionales y las complicaciones a corto plazo de la prótesis invertida de hombro según diferentes patologías. Materiales y Métodos: Entre 2009 y 2013, se colocaron 85 prótesis invertidas de hombro. Las indicaciones fueron: artropatía por ruptura del manguito rotador, artrosis glenohumeral, fracturas de húmero proximal y artroplastias de revisión. Se evaluó a los pacientes clínica y radiológicamente, y fueron analizados según los diferentes grupos. Resultados: El seguimiento promedio fue de 42 meses (rango 26-60) y la media de la edad, de 74.5 años (rango 56-90). El puntaje de Constant mejoró de 16,7 a 62,1 en promedio (p <0,001) y el de ASES, de 12,7 a 68,8 en promedio (p <0,001). La elevación aumentó de 80,5° a 111,5° (p <0,001). No hubo mejoría significativa en las rotaciones interna ni externa. Sesenta pacientes (78,9%) refirieron estar muy satisfechos/satisfechos. En 22 pacientes (27,8%), se hallaron muescas en el borde inferior de la glena. La tasa de complicaciones fue del 20%, y estas fueron más frecuentes en el grupo de fracturas y artroplastias de revisión. Conclusiones: La prótesis invertida de hombro mejora significativamente los puntajes funcionales, la flexión anterior y la abducción, independientemente de la indicación quirúrgica. Presenta limitaciones con respecto a las rotaciones externa e interna en el posoperatorio. Es una alternativa válida en múltiples patologías de hombro; sin embargo, la tasa de complicaciones es elevada, por lo que su indicación debe ser precisa, especialmente en pacientes tratados por fracturas o en cirugías de revisión. Nivel de Evidencia: IV

Objective: The purpose of this study is to analyze the short-term functional results and complications of the reverse shoulder prosthesis according to different etiologies. Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, 85 reverse shoulder arthroplasties were performed. Surgical indications included: rotator cuff tear artropathy, glenohumeral osteoarthritis, proximal humeral fractures and revision arthroplasty. Patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated and analyzed in different groups. Results: The mean follow-up was 42 months (range 26-60) and the mean age was 74.5 years (range 56-90). Constant score improved from 16.7 to 62.1 on average (p<.001) while ASES score improved from 12.7 to 68.8 on average (p<.001). Elevation increased from 80.5° to 111.5° (p<.001). There was no significant improvement in internal and external rotation. Sixty patients (78.9%) were very satisfied/satisfied. A total of 22 patients (27.8%) had notches in the inferior rim of the glenoid. Complication rate was 20%, being more frequent in the group of fractures and revision arthroplasties. Conclusions: The reverse shoulder arthroplasty significantly improved functional scores, anterior flexion and abduction, regardless of surgical indication. It has limitations with respect to the external and internal rotation postoperatively. It is a valid alternative in multiple shoulder conditions; however, complication rate is high, so the indication should be accurate, especially in patients treated for fractures or in revision surgeries. Level of Evidence: IV

Endoscopic Extra-articular Surgical Removal of Heterotopic Ossification of the Rectus Femoris Tendon in a Series of Athletes.

BACKGROUND: Calcific deposits in tendon, muscles, and periarticular areas are very common. Heterotopic ossification of the rectus femoris (HORF) is a rare condition, and several theories exist regarding the etiopathogenesis, which appears to be multifactorial with traumatic, genetic, and local metabolic factors involved. Although HORF typically responds to nonoperative treatment, when this approach fails, endoscopic treatment is a minimally invasive technique to address the pathology. PURPOSE: To report the clinical and radiological outcomes of 9 athletes with HORF who underwent endoscopic resection. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Nine male athletes were treated with endoscopic extra-articular resection of HORF after failure of a 6-month course of nonoperative treatment. All patients were studied with radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Outcomes were assessed clinically using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), a visual analog scale for sport activity-related pain (VAS-SRP), patient satisfaction, and ability and time to return to the preoperative sport level. Radiographic assessment was performed to determine recurrence. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 32 years (range, 23-47 years). Mean follow-up was 44 months (range, 14-73 months). All patients had improved mHHS scores from a mean preoperative of 65.6 (SD, 8.2) to 93.9 (SD, 3.6). Pain decreased from a mean 8.2 preoperatively (SD, 0.9) to 0.4 (SD, 0.7) at last follow-up. There were no complications, and all patients were able to return to their previous sports at the same level except for 1 recreational athlete. There was only 1 radiological recurrence at last follow-up in an asymptomatic patient. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest case series of athletes with HORF treated with endoscopic resection. We found this extra-articular endoscopic technique to be safe and effective, showing clinical outcome improvement and 90% chance of return to full activity. We also found 10% recurrence rate of asymptomatic heterotopic ossification.

Hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritis: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy treatment in patients with osteoarthritis is controversial. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: To systematically review the clinical outcome of patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA) treated with arthroscopy and what proportion of these patients subsequently underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library and LILACS were searched from January 1990 through December 2013 for eligible studies. The methodological quality of the collected data (applied to each study) was performed with a modified version of the Coleman methodology score (mCMS). RESULTS: 11 studies were included in this review. Most of the studies included reported clinical improvements. The overall conversion rate to THA ranged from 9.5% to 50%. Mean time between arthroscopy and THA was 13.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of studies is low. We have found inconclusive evidence to make categorical indications for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of OA, although we have found that there is some postoperative clinical outcome improvement of pain and function in a short-term evaluation. Increasingly worse outcomes were seen as the severity of OA increased.

Artrodesis mediocarpiana: estudio de la evolución clínico-radiológica con tres años de seguimiento mínimo / Midcarpal fusion. Clinical and radiological study on outcomes with a minimum follow-up of three years

Determinar la evolución clínica y radiológica de los pacientes tratados con artrodesis mediocarpiana con un seguimiento mínimo de tres años. Materiales y Métodos: Se estudiaron los pacientes tratados en nuestro Servicio mediante artrodesis mediocarpiana desde mayo de 1998. Entre un total de 27, se incluyeron 11 muñecas que contaban con un seguimiento mínimo de tres años. Ocho pacientes eran hombres y tres, mujeres, con una media de edad de 47 años (rango 16-66) y un seguimiento promedio de 6.7 años (rango 3-15). La técnica utilizada fue artrodesis de 2 o 4 esquinas con resección del escafoides más injerto de radio distal. Se evaluaron el dolor con la Escala Analógica Visual, la movilidad y la fuerza de puño. Se aplicó el cuestionario QuickDASH y se tomaron radiografías de control. Resultados: El dolor mejoró de 5/10 en reposo y 8/10 en actividad antes del procedimiento a 0/10 y 2/10, respectivamente. La movilidad perdida con respecto al lado sano fue del 39% de flexo-extensión, 15% de desviación radial y 31% de desviación cubital. No hubo cambios en la pronosupinación y el QuickDASH posoperatorio fue de 10. La fuerza fue del 92% comparada con el lado contralateral. Radiológicamente cuatro pacientes no tuvieron cambios en la luz articular radiolunar; en los restantes, disminuyó. Dos fueron reoperados por seudoartrosis, con injerto óseo. Conclusiones: La artrodesis mediocarpiana mejora los síntomas y conserva el 61% de la flexo-extensión, el 85% de la desviación radial, el 31% de la cubital y el 92% de la fuerza. Nivel de Evidencia: IV...

To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with midcarpal arthrodesis with a minimum follow-up of three years. Methods: Patients treated in our Service through midcarpal arthrodesis since May 1998 were studied. From a total of 27 patients, 11 wrists with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were included. Eight patients were men and three were women, with a mean age of 47 years (range 16-66) and an average follow-up of 6.7 years (range 3-15). The technique was 2 or 4 corner fusion with scaphoid resection plus distal radius graft. Pain using Visual Analog Scale, mobility, and grip strength were evaluated. QuickDASH scoring and control X-rays were performed. Results: Pain improved from a preoperative value of 5/10 at rest and 8/10 at activity to 0/10 and 2/10 after surgery, respectively. The lost motion with respect to the healthy side was flexo-extension 39%, radial deviation 15%, and ulnar deviation 31%. There were no changes in pronosupination and the postoperative QuickDASH score was 10. Force was 92% compared to the opposite side. Radiologically four patients didn´t show changes in radiolunate joint space; in the remaining, it was narrower. Two patients were reoperated on for nonunion with bone graft. Conclusions: Midcarpal fusion improves symptoms, retaining 61% of flexo-extension, 85% of the radial deviation, 31% of the ulnar deviation and 92% of the force. Level of Evidence: IV...