ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the application and effect of the PDCA cycle nursing management model in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.@*Methods @#Thirty patients with peri-implant mucositis were treated nonsurgically. Before treatment, the 30 patients had no history of systemic diseases, drug allergies, or bad habits. According to the principle of single-blind randomized control, the patients were divided into two groups: 15 patients were assigned to the control group and received routine clinical nursing and oral hygiene education according to the doctor′s prescription; and 15 patients were assigned to the intervention group, in which the PDCA cycle nursing management model was adopted. The four steps of “plan, do, check and act” were carried out. The plaque index (PL), gingival index (GI) and probe depth (PD) in the two groups were recorded before treatment and 3 and 6 months after treatment.@*Results@# There was no significant difference in the PL, GI or PD between the intervention group and the control group before treatment (P > 0.05). Three months after treatment, the PL in the intervention group was 1.25 ± 0.44, while the PL in the control group was 1.49 ± 0.39, with a significant difference (t=2.56, P=0.008); the GI in the intervention group was 1.21 ± 0.43, while the GI in the control group was 1.56 ± 0.37, with significant difference (t=2.94, P=0.006); and the PD in the intervention group was 4.39 ± 0.41 while the PD in the control group was 4.47 ± 0.52 mm, with no significant difference (t=2.24, P=0.062). Six months after treatment, the PL in the intervention group was 1.26 ± 0.48, while the PL in the control group was 1.51 ± 0.42, with a significant difference (t=2.66, P=0.007); the GI in the intervention group was 1.34 ± 0.28, while the GI in the control group was 1.74 ± 0.48 (t=2.98, P=0.008); and the PD in the intervention group was 4.46 ± 0.52 mm, while the PD in the control group was 4.54 ± 0.66, with no significant difference (t=2.28, P=0.077).@*Conclusion @#The PDCA cycle nursing management model can enhance patients′ awareness of oral health maintenance, reduce gingival plaque accumulation, and effectively improve the health status of peri-implant tissues.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application of submandibular gland flap with facial artery and vein pedicle, for repairing defects following tumor resection in the infratemporal region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients, including eight males and seven females ranging in age from 21 to 73 years, underwent surgical resection of tumors in the infratemporal region. Tumors were exposed using the submandibular incision approach and completely resected after pulling and rotating the mandible laterally. Mandibular osteotomy was performed for larger tumors or those that were not completely exposed. After tumor resection, the submandibular gland flap was used to fill up the residual defect following tumor resection. RESULTS: The incisions healed well without exudation or infection (primary healing) postoperatively in all the patients. Long-term follow-up showed no tumor recurrence in all cases. Seven of the patients who underwent mandibular ramus osteotomy had numbness of the lower lip due to inferior alveolar nerve injury. No other complications were observed postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The submandibular gland flap with facial artery and vein pedicle is a reliable, effective, and easy approach for repairing the defects caused by tumor resection in the infratemporal region, and has great potential for application in the clinical setting.
